IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9030-d1769415.html

Europe 2020 Strategy and 20/20/20 Targets: An Ex Post Assessment Across EU Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Norbert Życzyński

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Bożena Sowa

    (Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Tadeusz Olejarz

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Alina Walenia

    (Faculty of Economics and Finance, University of Rzeszow, 2 Cwiklinskiej, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Wiesław Lewicki

    (Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Gurba

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of the National Education Commission Krakow, ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

The 2020 Europe Strategy was designed as a comprehensive framework to promote smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the European Union (EU), particularly emphasising the ‘20/20/20’ targets related to climate protection and energy policy. This study provides an ex post evaluation of the extent to which the strategy’s objectives were achieved in the member states of the EU in the period 2010–2020. The analysis is based on Eurostat data and uses Hellwig’s multidimensional comparative analysis to construct a synthetic indicator of progress. The results show that EU countries have made significant advances in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption, with Sweden and Finland identified as leaders, while Malta and Hungary lagged behind. Primary energy consumption overall decreased, although only a minority of the member states reached the planned thresholds. Progress was less evident in research and development (R&D) expenditure, where the average value of the EU remained below the 3% GDP target, and strong disparities persisted between innovation leaders and weaker performers. Improvements in higher education attainment were observed, contributing to the long-term goal of a knowledge-based economy, although labour market difficulties, especially among young people, remained unresolved. The findings suggest that, although the Strategy contributed to tangible progress in several areas, uneven achievements among member states limited its overall effectiveness. The study is limited by the reliance on aggregate statistical data and a single methodological approach. Future research should extend the analysis to longer time horizons, include qualitative assessments of national policies, and address implications for the implementation of the European Green Deal and subsequent EU development strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Norbert Życzyński & Bożena Sowa & Tadeusz Olejarz & Alina Walenia & Wiesław Lewicki & Krzysztof Gurba, 2025. "Europe 2020 Strategy and 20/20/20 Targets: An Ex Post Assessment Across EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9030-:d:1769415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Mariusz Sołtysik & Szymon Jarosz & Ryszard Pukała, 2023. "The Linkage between Renewable Energy and Project Management: What Do We Already Know, and What Are the Future Directions of Research?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Diane Coyle, 2015. "GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History (Revised and Expanded Edition)," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10598, December.
    3. Christian Kroll & Anne Warchold & Prajal Pradhan, 2019. "Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Jingan Chen & Chengdong Yi & Yourong Wang & Tianyu Bi, 2022. "Do Honored Cities Achieve a Sustainable Development? A Quasi-Natural Experimental Study Based on “National Civilized City” Campaign in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Houljakbe Houlteurbe Dagou & Asli Pelin Gurgun & Kerim Koc & Cenk Budayan, 2025. "The Future of Construction: Integrating Innovative Technologies for Smarter Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, May.
    5. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    6. Emine Tahsin, 2026. "Challenges of the SDGs performance of Türkiye “An Evenness and Income Trend Evaluation”," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, March.
    7. Navid Khan & Ke Xing & Salman Mahmood & Riaz Ahmad, 2024. "Key underlying concepts of shared prosperity: insights from a literature review," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 71(3), pages 727-751, September.
    8. Kuifeng Wang & Paul Liu & Fengsheng Sun & Shengwen Wang & Gong Zhang & Taiping Zhang & Guodong Chen & Jinqiu Liu & Gangchao Wang & Songkun Cao, 2023. "Progress in Realizing the Value of Ecological Products in China and Its Practice in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-30, June.
    9. Adam J. M. Devenish & Petra Schmitter & Nugun. P. Jellason & Nafeesa Esmail & Nur M. Abdi & Selase K. Adanu & Barbara Adolph & Maha Al-Zu’bi & Amali A. Amali & Jennie Barron & Abbie S. A. Chapman & Al, 2023. "One Hundred Priority Questions for the Development of Sustainable Food Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Leah V. Gibbons, 2020. "Regenerative—The New Sustainable?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła & Aneta Becker & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel, 2025. "Territorial Variation of Energy Poverty and Good Health and Well-Being in European Union Countries—A Spatial Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-33, October.
    12. Bernardino Benito & María‐Dolores Guillamón & Ana‐María Ríos, 2023. "The sustainable development goals: How does their implementation affect the financial sustainability of the largest Spanish municipalities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2836-2850, August.
    13. Pilar Guaita‐Fernández & José María Martín Martín & Samuel Ribeiro Navarrete & Rosa Puertas, 2024. "Analysis of gender‐based violence in the context of the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4946-4958, October.
    14. Anil Markandya & Laura Cavalli & Arnab Bhattacharya & Gregmar Galinato & Luca Farnia, 2025. "Links between the sustainable development goals: An analysis for Italy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1068-1084, February.
    15. Mark Elder, 2025. "Integration versus prioritization in the Sustainable Development Goals: An argument to prioritize environmental sustainability and a just transition," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 465-477, February.
    16. Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła & Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska, 2021. "Towards Understanding Interactions between Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Climate-Well-Being Linkages. Experiences of EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Alexander Brand & Mark Furness & Niels Keijzer, 2021. "Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 108-118.
    18. Anne Warchold & Prajal Pradhan & Jürgen P. Kropp, 2021. "Variations in sustainable development goal interactions: Population, regional, and income disaggregation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 285-299, March.
    19. Celestine Chijioke Onah & Aduma Aloysius & Benjamin Amujiri, 2023. "Marshall Plan and International Development Strategy: Perspectives from African Underdevelopment," Insight on Africa, , vol. 15(2), pages 169-183, July.
    20. Jonathan P. Truslove & Andrea B. Coulson & Muthi Nhlema & Emma Mbalame & Robert M. Kalin, 2020. "Reflecting SDG 6.1 in Rural Water Supply Tariffs: Considering ‘Affordability’ Versus ‘Operations and Maintenance Costs’ in Malawi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9030-:d:1769415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.