IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8411-d1753291.html

Optimizing Laundry for Sustainability: Balancing Washing Efficiency and Environmental Impact in the Clothing Use Phase

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Xia

    (Univ. Lille, ENSAIT, ULR 2461—GEMTEX—Génie et Matériaux Textiles, F-59000 Lille, France)

  • Romain Benkirane

    (Univ. Lille, ENSAIT, ULR 2461—GEMTEX—Génie et Matériaux Textiles, F-59000 Lille, France)

  • Anne Perwuelz

    (Univ. Lille, ENSAIT, ULR 2461—GEMTEX—Génie et Matériaux Textiles, F-59000 Lille, France)

Abstract

The use phase of clothing contributes significantly to the overall environmental impacts due to clothing care practices. Decreasing environmental impact while maintaining washing performance in the use phase can be an effective strategy for sustainability and circularity in the textile value chain. However, existing studies on the environmental impacts of use phase usually consider limited washing conditions and neglect their impacts on washing efficiency. This study proposes a research framework that integrates the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to optimize washing parameters for better washing efficiency with less environmental impact in the clothing use phase. A series of laundry experiments were conducted to simulate household laundry, and an environmental impact assessment was conducted based on the experimental data. The optimized washing parameters were explored under eight impact categories and in terms of washing efficiency, and comparative analyses were conducted between three different washing scenarios. The results indicated that input load is the most significant factor influencing both washing efficiency and environmental impact, but with a negative correlation. The optimized washing conditions provided effective trade-offs, demonstrating notable environmental benefits through the scenario study. In the daily washing scenario with an expectation for a middle level of washing efficiency, using the optimized washing conditions can reduce the environmental impact by 80% on average compared to the high-washing-efficiency-oriented washing process and 60% on average compared to the low-environmental-impact-oriented washing process. However, for high washing efficiency demand, optimized washing conditions are less competitive due to increased washing time and detergent use. The results emphasized the importance of choosing appropriate washing parameters according to the demand for washing efficiency. Consistent environmental improvements can be achieved by changing consumer washing habits.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Xia & Romain Benkirane & Anne Perwuelz, 2025. "Optimizing Laundry for Sustainability: Balancing Washing Efficiency and Environmental Impact in the Clothing Use Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8411-:d:1753291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasiūnas, Žygimantas & Julião, Tiago & Cecílio, José & Carrilho da Graça, Guilherme & Ferreira, Pedro M., 2025. "A soft sensor to assess the energy performance of laundry washing machines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    2. Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Kirsi Laitala & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Clothing Lifespans: What Should Be Measured and How," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Baydar, G. & Ciliz, N. & Mammadov, A., 2015. "Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 213-223.
    4. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Beverley Henry, 2018. "Does Use Matter? Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Clothing Based on Fiber Type," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Mélanie Schmutz & Roland Hischier & Claudia Som, 2021. "Factors Allowing Users to Influence the Environmental Performance of Their T-Shirt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnė Jučienė & Inga Gurauskienė & Jolita Kruopienė, 2025. "Calculating the Environmental Impact Reduction Due to Extended Lifespan of Clothing Through Clothing Swaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Wenjun Guo & Eunyoung Kim, 2023. "Categorizing Chinese Consumers’ Behavior to Identify Factors Related to Sustainable Clothing Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Sarah Gray & Angela Druckman & Jhuma Sadhukhan & Keith James, 2022. "Reducing the Environmental Impact of Clothing: An Exploration of the Potential of Alternative Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    4. William J. Harvey & Naomi Black & Salma Essaouabi & Leo Petrokofsky & Vidya Rangan & Matt Stancliffe Bird & Daniel Villar & Marxine Waite & Gillian Petrokofsky, 2025. "The Impact of Sustainability Certification Schemes and Labels on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Systematic Evidence Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Hampus André, 2024. "Opening the black box of the use phase in circular economy life cycle assessments: Environmental performance of shell jacket reuse," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 542-555, June.
    6. Wen-Kuo Chen & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Interrelationship among CE Adoption Obstacles of Supply Chain in the Textile Sector: Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Julie Madon, 2023. "“When we got divorced, I left all my things behind.”: How the lifespan of household goods is linked to the biographical trajectory of their owners," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 822-833, June.
    8. Shuang Chen & Fangli Chen & Lisha Zhu & Qizheng Li & Xiaopeng Wang & Laili Wang, 2023. "A Spatial Water Footprint Assessment of Recycled Cotton T-Shirts: Case of Local Impacts in Selected China Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Piwońska Kalina & Urbańska Michalina & Pilarska Eliza & Miniszewski Maciej & Staniszewski Jakub & Kryszak Łukasz, 2021. "Managing sustainable consumption of durable goods – A systematic literature review," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 73-90, December.
    10. Roy, Vivek & Silvestre, Bruno S. & Singh, Shubham, 2020. "Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: Manufacturer's perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Roy Kettlewell & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Laundry Care Regimes: Do the Practices of Keeping Clothes Clean Have Different Environmental Impacts Based on the Fibre Content?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    12. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A. & de la Guardia, M., 2017. "Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 107-115.
    13. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp, 2020. "What Affects Garment Lifespans? International Clothing Practices Based on a Wardrobe Survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-45, November.
    14. Mitali Nautiyal & Amabel Hunting & Frances Joseph & Donna Cleveland, 2023. "Examining Practices of Apparel Use and End of Life in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry, 2022. "Sustainability in the Fast Fashion Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1276-1293, May.
    16. Mitali Nautiyal & Donna Cleveland & Amabel Hunting & Amanda Smith, 2025. "Legacy Datasets and Their Impacts: Analysing Ecoinvent’s Influence on Wool and Polyester LCA Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Maja Wiprächtiger & Martina Rapp & Stefanie Hellweg & Rhythima Shinde & Melanie Haupt, 2022. "Turning trash into treasure: An approach to the environmental assessment of waste prevention and its application to clothing and furniture in Switzerland," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1389-1405, August.
    18. Kosar Mousavi & Elaheh Kowsari & Seeram Ramakrishna & Amutha Chinnappan & Mohammad Gheibi, 2025. "A comprehensive review of greenwashing in the textile industry (life cycle assessment, life cycle cost, and eco-labeling)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21737-21777, September.
    19. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp, 2019. "Dressing a Demanding Body to Fit In: Clean and Decent with Ostomy or Chronic Skin Disease," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 124-135.
    20. Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Kirsi Laitala & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Clothing Lifespans: What Should Be Measured and How," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8411-:d:1753291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.