IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8174-d1747098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-Ecological Drivers of Ecosystem Services in Karst Forest Park: Interactions Among Climate, Vegetation, Geomorphology, and Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Zhixin Li

    (School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Rui Li

    (School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Mei Chen

    (School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
    State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China)

Abstract

Forest parks are vital terrestrial ecosystems that provide multiple ecosystem services (ESs) to both society and nature, including carbon storage, water conservation, soil retention, and tourism-related cultural services. These services are essential for maintaining ecological security and supporting socio-economic development. However, little is known about how ESs vary across forest parks situated in different karst landforms, and integrated re-search on the combined effects of climate, vegetation, karst surface characteristics, and tourism remains limited. In this study, we examine forest parks in Guizhou Province, China, selecting four key ESs—water conservation, soil retention, carbon storage, and cultural services associated with tourism—and evaluate their levels through a comprehensive ecosystem services index (CES). We apply a structural equation model (PLS-SEM) to disentangle how climate, vegetation, karst surface features, and tourism activities drive spatial heterogeneity in CES. The results reveal significant differences among karst land-form units: carbon storage is relatively low in karst plateaus and gorges, whereas water conservation is highest in non-karst areas. Together, the four categories of driving factors explain 71.6–74.2% of the variance in CES, with climate emerging as the dominant contributor to spatial variation. For individual services, the principal drivers differ: normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and tourist numbers are jointly shaped by karst surface characteristics and climate, while multi-year average spring precipitation is the most influential factor across forest parks. This study provides new evidence of the socio-ecological mechanisms regulating ESs in karst mountain forestscapes and offers a scientific reference for enhancing and regeneratively managing ecosystem services in these fragile regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhixin Li & Rui Li & Mei Chen, 2025. "Socio-Ecological Drivers of Ecosystem Services in Karst Forest Park: Interactions Among Climate, Vegetation, Geomorphology, and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8174-:d:1747098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peipei Miao & Xiaoqing Zhao & Junwei Pu & Pei Huang & Xiaoqian Shi & Zexian Gu, 2022. "Study on the Evolution Mechanism of Ecosystem Services in Karst Mountainous Areas from the Perspective of Humanities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Ghasemi, Mitra & Charrahy, Zabih & González-García, Alberto, 2023. "Mapping cultural ecosystem services provision: An integrated model of recreation and ecotourism opportunities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Cheng, Yingyi & Zhao, Bing & Peng, Siqi & Li, Kai & Yin, Yue & Zhang, Jinguang, 2024. "Effects of cultural landscape service features in national forest parks on visitors’ sentiments: A nationwide social media-based analysis in China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Canedoli, Claudia & Ferrè, Chiara & Abu El Khair, Davide & Comolli, Roberto & Liga, Claudio & Mazzucchelli, Francesca & Proietto, Angela & Rota, Noemi & Colombo, Giacomo & Bassano, Bruno & Viterbi, Ra, 2020. "Evaluation of ecosystem services in a protected mountain area: Soil organic carbon stock and biodiversity in alpine forests and grasslands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    5. Tamás Telbisz & Zoltán Imecs & András Máthé & László Mari, 2023. "Empirical Investigation of the Motivation and Perception of Tourists Visiting the Apuseni Nature Park (Romania) and the Relationship of Tourism and Natural Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Wen Wei & Ao Yang & Lanxi Jiang & Gillian Lawson & Wen Lei, 2025. "Ecological Recreation Across the Jinma Mountain Region: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Suburban Mountain Greenway Networks," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur & Dante Loto & Julián Rodríguez-Souilla & Eduarda M. O. Silveira & Juan M. Cellini & Pablo L. Peri, 2024. "Different Approaches of Forest Type Classifications for Argentina Based on Functional Forests and Canopy Cover Composition by Tree Species," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Grigore Vasile Herman & Corina Florina Tătar & Marcu Simion Stașac & Victor Lucian Cosman, 2023. "Exploring the Relationship between Tourist Perception and Motivation at a Museum Attraction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Simone Ravetto Enri & Fabio Petrella & Fabrizio Ungaro & Laura Zavattaro & Andrea Mainetti & Giampiero Lombardi & Michele Lonati, 2021. "Relative Importance of Plant Species Composition and Environmental Factors in Affecting Soil Carbon Stocks of Alpine Pastures (NW Italy)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Cristian Arosio & Luca Giupponi & Annamaria Giorgi & Alessio Cislaghi & Michele Eugenio D’Amico, 2025. "Recovery of Soil-Based Ecosystem Services in Abandoned Ski Resorts: The Valcanale Case Study (Bergamo, Italian Alps)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Pablo L. Peri & Juan Gaitán & Boris Díaz & Leandro Almonacid & Cristian Morales & Francisco Ferrer & Romina Lasagno & Julián Rodríguez-Souilla & Guillermo Martínez Pastur, 2024. "Vegetation Type Mapping in Southern Patagonia and Its Relationship with Ecosystem Services, Soil Carbon Stock, and Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Qin Huang & Chen Zhou & Manchun Li & Yu Ma & Song Hua, 2024. "An Approach for Mapping Ecotourism Suitability Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of Zhangjiajie, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Branko Protić & Bogdan Lukić & Vladimir Popović & Dušan Ristić & Velimir Šećerov & Marija R. Jeftić & Dejan S. Đorđević & Bojan Vračarević, 2024. "Balancing Act: Assessing the Impacts of Winter Tourism on Natural Heritage in Kopaonik National Park and Charting a Sustainable Path Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.
    8. Miroslav Despotovic & Christoph Hauser, 2025. "A beautiful place: investigating the determinants of perceived scenic beauty in Austrian landscapes with social media data," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Wang, Han & Lu, Siying & Lu, Bo & Nie, Xin, 2021. "Overt and covert: The relationship between the transfer of land development rights and carbon emissions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Huang Huang & Jiaxin Qi & Suili Xiao & Wolfgang Wende & Yingdu Xin, 2024. "A Reflection on the Implementation of a Waterfront Greenway from a Social–Ecological Perspective: A Case Study of Huangyan-Taizhou in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Wang, Zhifang & Fu, Hongpeng & Jian, Yuqing & Qureshi, Salman & Jie, Hua & Wang, Lu, 2022. "On the comparative use of social media data and survey data in prioritizing ecosystem services for cost-effective governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Rebeca Guillén-Peñafiel & Ana María Hernández-Carretero & José Manuel Sánchez-Martín, 2024. "Intangible Heritage, Education and Tourism as a Strategy for the Enhancement of the Value of the Dehesa and the Traditional Shepherd’s Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-36, December.
    13. Wudong Zhao & Jiaming Liu & He Zhu & Fengjiao Li & Zehui Zhu & Rouyu Zhengchen, 2025. "Inter-Provincial Similarities and Differences in Image Perception of High-Quality Tourism Destinations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Schirpke, Uta & Wang, Genxu & Padoa-Schioppa, Emilio, 2021. "Editorial: Mountain landscapes: Protected areas, ecosystem services, and future challenges," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    15. Ahmed Nuru Zeleke & Tuğba Deniz, 2023. "The Impact of Visitor Profile on Effective Management of Protected Areas: A Case of Atatürk Arboretum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    16. Mengqi Yuan & Fang Han & Xuankai Ma & Tian Wang & Qixiang Liang, 2024. "Recreational Ecosystem Services in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau National Park Group: Mapping, Monetization, and Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Monika Kozłowska-Adamczak & Patrycja Essing-Jelonkiewicz & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle, 2023. "Leveraging Information and Communication Technologies in Forest Ecotourism: A Case Study from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-31, December.
    18. Qianhong Quan & Yijin Wu, 2024. "Integrating Entropy Weight and MaxEnt Models for Ecotourism Suitability Assessment in Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8174-:d:1747098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.