Author
Listed:
- Wudong Zhao
(Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Jiaming Liu
(Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- He Zhu
(Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Fengjiao Li
(School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
- Zehui Zhu
(Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Rouyu Zhengchen
(Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Abstract
With the rapid development of China’s tourism industry, the homogenization of regional tourism images has become a growing concern. To address this, this study quantifies the similarities and differences in tourism image perception across China’s 31 provinces, focusing on 350 5A-level destinations, analyzing 757,046 tourist reviews collected from Ctrip.com in 2024. Using a three-dimensional framework (cognitive, affective, and overall image), we analyze social media data through natural language processing, random forest regression, and social network analysis. Key findings include the following: (1) most comments are positive, with Jiangsu and Chongqing showing high cognitive image similarity but low overall similarity; (2) cognitive image significantly impacts affective image, especially through unique tourism resources; (3) an inter-provincial similarity–difference matrix reveals significant perceptual differences among provinces. This study provides a novel methodological approach for multidimensional image evaluation and offers crucial empirical insights for regional policy-making aimed at optimizing land and tourism resource allocation, balancing regional disparities, and promoting sustainable land use and development across China.
Suggested Citation
Wudong Zhao & Jiaming Liu & He Zhu & Fengjiao Li & Zehui Zhu & Rouyu Zhengchen, 2025.
"Inter-Provincial Similarities and Differences in Image Perception of High-Quality Tourism Destinations in China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:1999-:d:1765447
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:1999-:d:1765447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.