IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7705-d1733454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Carbon Stock Simulation in Jiangsu Province Using InVEST and Random Forest Under Multi-Scenario Climate and Productivity Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Shi

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Wei Yan

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Weixiao Chen

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Carbon stock plays a crucial role in regulating atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and represents a vital ecological function for mitigating climate change and supporting long-term environmental sustainability. Jiangsu Province, a typical region experiencing rapid urbanization and land-use transformation in eastern China, serves as a representative case for regional-scale carbon assessment. This study employs the InVEST model, integrated with multi-source remote sensing data, a random forest algorithm, and a control variable approach, to simulate the spatiotemporal dynamics of carbon stock in Jiangsu Province under a set of climate, productivity, and population scenarios. Three scenario groups were designed to isolate the individual effects of climate change, gross primary productivity, and population density from 2020 to 2060, enabling a clearer understanding of the dominant drivers. The results indicate that the coupled model estimates Jiangsu’s 2020 carbon stock at 1.52 × 10 9 t C, slightly below the 1.82 × 10 9 t C estimated by the standalone InVEST model, with the coupled results closer to previous estimates. Compared with InVEST alone, the integrated model significantly improves numerical accuracy and spatial resolution, allowing for finer-scale pattern recognition. By 2060, carbon stock is projected to decline by approximately 24.4% across all scenarios. Among the features, climate change exerts the most significant influence, with an elasticity coefficient range of −37.76–1.01, followed by productivity, while population density has minimal impact. These findings underscore the dominant role of climate drivers and highlight that model integration improves both predictive accuracy and spatial detail, offering a more robust basis for scenario-based assessment. The proposed approach provides valuable insights for supporting sustainable carbon management, real-time monitoring, and provincial-scale decarbonization planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Shi & Wei Yan & Weixiao Chen, 2025. "Integrated Carbon Stock Simulation in Jiangsu Province Using InVEST and Random Forest Under Multi-Scenario Climate and Productivity Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7705-:d:1733454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7705/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7705/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yulin Liu & Min Zhang & Rujia Liu, 2020. "The Impact of Income Inequality on Carbon Emissions in China: A Household-Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Rob Bellamy & Shannon Osaka, 2020. "Unnatural climate solutions?," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(2), pages 98-99, February.
    3. Wang, Zhaoqi, 2019. "Estimating of terrestrial carbon storage and its internal carbon exchange under equilibrium state," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 94-110.
    4. Wenying Li & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu & Yixuan Zhang & Xiaodan Zhu, 2024. "Construction Land Transfer Scale and Carbon Emission Intensity: Empirical Evidence Based on County-Level Land Transactions in Jiangsu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Liqiao & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Li, Yuan & Cheng, Nan & Xue, Jinjun & Long, Yin, 2024. "Sustainable lifestyle: Quantification and determining factors analysis of household carbon footprints in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. John A. Paravantis & Panagiotis D. Tasios & Vasileios Dourmas & Georgios Andreakos & Konstantinos Velaoras & Nikoletta Kontoulis & Panagiota Mihalakakou, 2021. "A Regression Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Itbar Khan & Ruoyu Zhong & Lei Han & Hayat Khan, 2025. "Analyzing the Nexus Between Income Inequality, Renewable Energy, and Environmental Quality: Emphasizing the Significance of Institutional Quality," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3793-3825, March.
    4. Claudy, Marius C. & Parkinson, Mary & Aquino, Karl, 2024. "Why should innovators care about morality? Political ideology, moral foundations, and the acceptance of technological innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Ushuki A. Amuyou & Yi Wang & Francis Bisong & Alexander S. Antonarakis, 2021. "Livelihood Impacts of Forest Carbon Protection in the Context of Redd+ in Cross River State, Southeast Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Jeroen K.G. Hopster & Alessio Gerola & Ben Hofbauer & Guido Löhr & Julia Rijssenbeek & Paulan Korenhof, 2024. "Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(4), pages 414-433, August.
    7. Congjia Huo & Lingming Chen, 2022. "The Impact of the Income Gap on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Rahul Shelar & Sachin Nandgude & Mukesh Tiwari & Sunil Gorantiwar & Atul Atre, 2022. "Impact Assessment of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Carbon Sequestration: A Case Study for the Tropical Watershed Using Advanced Geospatial Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Zhaoqi Wang & Zhiyuan Lu & Guolong Cui, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Variation of Land Surface Temperature and Vegetation in Response to Climate Change Based on NOAA-AVHRR Data over China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Merk, Christine & Liebe, Ulf & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Rehdanz, Katrin, 2023. "German citizens’ preference for domestic carbon dioxide removal by afforestation is incompatible with national removal potential," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 270884, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Kuhn, Annegret & Merk, Christine & Wunsch, Andrea, 2024. "Carbon dioxide removal through ecosystem restoration: Public perceptions and political participation," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 306554, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Yan Zhang & Xiaoyong Liao & Dongqi Sun, 2024. "A Coupled InVEST-PLUS Model for the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Carbon Storage and Multi-Scenario Prediction Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Suling Feng & Junjie Liu & Dehui Xu, 2024. "Digital financial development and indirect household carbon emissions: empirical evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23401-23435, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7705-:d:1733454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.