IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7596-d1730615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Biochar on the Mechanical Properties of Bermuda-Grass-Vegetated Soil in China

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Wang

    (South Zhejiang Comprehensive Engineering Institute Co., Ltd. of Investigation and Mapping, Hangzhou 310012, China)

  • Feng Wang

    (Nuclear Industry Southwest Geotechnical Investigation & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610000, China)

  • Hongwei Liu

    (Zijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350025, China)

  • Hui Xu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 314423, China)

Abstract

The effects of biochar on Bermuda grass growth and mechanical properties of vegetated soil were investigated in this study. Six groups of soil column tests were conducted, including two degrees of compaction (DOC) (70% and 90%) and two types of biochar content (5% and 10% by soil dry weight), with two groups of bare soil serving as a reference (soil used in the test was classified as silty sand with gravel, i.e., SM). It was found that biochar increased the effective cohesion by up to 70% and slightly enhanced the effective internal friction angle while mitigating the detrimental effects of wetting–drying cycles, with the effective cohesion and friction angle retaining up to 73% and 99% of their initial values, respectively. Root biomass initially increased and then decreased as biochar content increased, particularly at a low degree of compaction of soil (i.e., 70% DOC was two times that of 90% DOC). The effective cohesion of intact biochar–root–soil initially increased up to 23% (at the biochar content of 5%, 90% DOC) and then decreased as biochar content increased, regardless of DOC. At the optimal biochar content (5%), the effective cohesion and internal friction angle of rooted soil were 1.4 and 1.1 times greater at low DOC (70%). For the remolded biochar–root–soil composite, at a high degree of compaction (90% DOC), the effective cohesion increased with the increase in root and biochar content. For a given root content, the shear strength of the remolded biochar–root–soil mixture was higher than that of intact biochar–root–soil (i.e., the shear strength of intact soil at 5% of biochar content was 87% of remolded soil), suggesting that the remolded soil mixture overestimated the biochar–root–soil strength. Generally, the present study demonstrates that a 5% biochar addition is optimal for enhancing plant root growth and soil strength, particularly under low compaction. Biochar significantly improves the mechanical performance of root–soil composites and mitigates the degradation of soil strength under wetting–drying cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Wang & Feng Wang & Hongwei Liu & Hui Xu, 2025. "Effects of Biochar on the Mechanical Properties of Bermuda-Grass-Vegetated Soil in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7596-:d:1730615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andi Febrisiantosa & Balasubramani Ravindran & Hong L. Choi, 2018. "The Effect of Co-Additives (Biochar and FGD Gypsum) on Ammonia Volatilization during the Composting of Livestock Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Bilal Ahmad & Hafeez Ur Rahim & Ishaq Ahmad Mian & Waqas Ali, 2025. "Synergistic Biochar–Nitrogen Application Enhances Soil Fertility and Compensates for Nutrient Deficiency, Improving Wheat Production in Calcareous Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Jayanto Kumar Sarkar & Qingyue Wang, 2020. "Different Pyrolysis Process Conditions of South Asian Waste Coconut Shell and Characterization of Gas, Bio-Char, and Bio-Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Gorshkov & Nikolay Berezikov & Albert Kaltaev & Stanislav Yankovsky & Konstantin Slyusarsky & Roman Tabakaev & Kirill Larionov, 2021. "Analysis of the Physicochemical Characteristics of Biochar Obtained by Slow Pyrolysis of Nut Shells in a Nitrogen Atmosphere," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Do-Gun Kim & Shinnee Boldbaatar & Seok-Oh Ko, 2022. "Enhanced Adsorption of Tetracycline by Thermal Modification of Coconut Shell-Based Activated Carbon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Guo, Feiqiang & Qiao, Qixia & Mao, Songbo & Bai, Jiaming & Dong, Kaiming & Shu, Rui & Xu, Liya & Wei, Haixiao & Qian, Lin & Wang, Yunpu, 2023. "A comprehensive study on the pyrolysis behavior of pine sawdust catalyzed by different metal ions under conventional and microwave heating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    4. Lavanya Madhavaraj & Ho-Dong Lim & Kong-Min Kim & Dae-Hyuk Kim & Gui Hwan Han, 2020. "Influence of Sargassum horneri Mitigating Odorous Gas Emissions from Swine Manure Storage Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Carlyn B. Peterson & Hamed M. El Mashad & Yongjing Zhao & Yuee Pan & Frank M. Mitloehner, 2020. "Effects of SOP Lagoon Additive on Gaseous Emissions from Stored Liquid Dairy Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Kumar, Rakesh & Dubey, Pratik & Mondal, Monoj Kumar, 2024. "Analysis of kinetics, mechanism, thermodynamic properties and product distribution for pyrolysis of Ni–Fe impregnated coconut husk," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Marcello Ermido Chiodini & Michele Costantini & Michele Zoli & Jacopo Bacenetti & Daniele Aspesi & Lorenzo Poggianella & Marco Acutis, 2023. "Real-Scale Study on Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction from Dairy Liquid Manure with the Commercial Additive SOP LAGOON," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Federica Borgonovo & Cecilia Conti & Daniela Lovarelli & Valentina Ferrante & Marcella Guarino, 2019. "Improving the Sustainability of Dairy Slurry by A Commercial Additive Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Nilougfar Mirzababaei & Akbar Hassani, 2024. "Comparative evaluation of organic waste composting rate with urea and KOH application: Environment Development and Sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3889-3910, February.
    10. Valeriy Voropaev & Nataliya Alfimova & Ivan Nikulin & Tatyana Nikulicheva & Aleksej Titenko & Vitaly Nikulichev, 2021. "Influence of Gypsum-Containing Waste on Ammonia Binding in Animal Waste Composting," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Sila Ozkan & Diogo Gonçalves & Ivo Paulo & Carla S. G. P. Queirós & Ana Carvalho & Jaime Puna & João Gomes & João Bordado & Rui Galhano dos Santos, 2023. "Modelling of Burnt Pine Heartwood Acid-Catalysed Liquefaction," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Marcela M. Marcelino & Gary A. Leeke & Guozhan Jiang & Jude A. Onwudili & Carine T. Alves & Delano M. de Santana & Felipe A. Torres & Ednildo A. Torres & Silvio A. B. Vieira de Melo, 2023. "Supercritical Water Gasification of Coconut Shell Impregnated with a Nickel Nanocatalyst: Box–Behnken Design and Process Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-34, April.
    13. Bogdan Saletnik & Marcin Bajcar & Aneta Saletnik & Grzegorz Zaguła & Czesław Puchalski, 2021. "Effect of the Pyrolysis Process Applied to Waste Branches Biomass from Fruit Trees on the Calorific Value of the Biochar and Dust Explosivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7596-:d:1730615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.