Street Trees as Sustainable Urban Air Purifiers: A Methodological Approach to Assessing Particulate Matter Phytofiltration

PM 2.5 is an air pollutant that has a direct link to increased cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality, which has been demonstrated in numerous studies. Existing research highlights species-specific variations in the capacity of trees to capture and retain particulate matter (PM). However, a critical gap remains regarding sensitivity analyses of i-Tree Eco model assumptions. Such analyses are crucial for validating the model’s PM deposition estimates against empirically derived efficiencies, a deficiency that the present study addresses. The study consisted of two steps: a tree inventory was carried out at three selected sites, based on which, an ecosystem service analysis was performed using i-Tree Eco, and samples were taken from the leaves of trees at the analysed sites, which were the basis for comparing the data from the i-Tree Eco method and laboratory methods. The study focused on comparing PM 2.5 and PM 10 removal estimates derived from both the model and laboratory measurements. The results revealed significant discrepancies between the modelled and laboratory values. A comparison of the average annual PM 10 accumulation measured using laboratory methods for individual tree species showed that Tilia sp. achieved 24%, Fraxinus sp. 47.6%, Aesculus sp. 50.77%, and Quercus robur 23.4% of the PM 10 uptake efficiency estimated by the i-Tree Eco model. For PM 2.5 uptake, the values obtained through both methods were more consistent. Furthermore, trees growing under more challenging environmental conditions exhibited smaller diameter at breast height (DBH) and lower PM 10 and PM 2.5 removal efficiency according to both methods. While I-Tree Eco incorporates tree biophysical characteristics and health status, its methodology currently lacks the resolution to reflect site-specific environmental conditions and local pollutant concentrations at the individual tree level. Therefore, laboratory methods are indispensable for calibrating, validating, and supplementing i-Tree Eco estimates, especially when applied to diverse urban environments. Only the combined application of empirical and model-based methods provides a comprehensive understanding of the potential of urban greenery to improve air quality.