IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12906-d937732.html

A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature on Pollutant Removal from Stormwater Runoff from Vacant Urban Lands

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Wang

    (College of Architecture and Urban Studies, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA)

  • Hao Yin

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Zhiruo Liu

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Xinyu Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100091, China)

Abstract

Even though the common acknowledgment that vacant urban lands (VUL) can play a positive role in improving stormwater management, little synthesized literature is focused on understanding how VUL can take advantage of different stormwater control measures (SCMs) to advance urban water quality. The project aims to provide urban planners with information on the remediation of vacant lands using urban runoff pollutant removal techniques. To find the most effective removal method, relevant scholarly papers and case studies are reviewed to see what types of vacant land have many urban runoff pollutants and how to effectively remove contaminants from stormwater runoff in the city by SCMs. The results show that previously developed/used land (but now vacant) has been identified as contaminated sites, including prior residential, commercial, industrial, and parking lot land use from urban areas. SCMs are effective management approaches to reduce nonpoint source pollution problems runoff. It is an umbrella concept that can be used to capture nature-based, cost-effective, and eco-friendly treatment technologies and redevelopment strategies that are socially inclusive, economically viable, and with good public acceptance. Among these removal techniques, a bioretention system tends to be effective for removing dissolved and particulate components of heavy metals and phosphorus. Using different plant species and increasing filter media depth has identified the effectiveness of eliminating nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 -N). A medium with a high hydraulic conductivity covers an existing medium with low hydraulic conductivity, and the result will be a higher and more effective decrease for phosphorus (P) pollutants. In addition, wet ponds were found to be highly effective at removing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, with removal rates as high as 99%. For the removal of perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) pollutants, despite the implementation of SCMs in urban areas to remove PFAAs and particulate-related contaminants in stormwater runoff, the current literature has little information on SCMs’ removal of PFAAs. Studies have also found that VUL’s size, shape, and connectivity are significantly inversely correlated with the reduction in stormwater runoff. This paper will help planners and landscape designers make efficient decisions around removing pollutants from VUL stormwater runoff, leading to better use of these spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Wang & Hao Yin & Zhiruo Liu & Xinyu Wang, 2022. "A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature on Pollutant Removal from Stormwater Runoff from Vacant Urban Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12906-:d:937732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan S. Debortoli & Pedro Ivo M. Camarinha & José A. Marengo & Regina R. Rodrigues, 2017. "An index of Brazil’s vulnerability to expected increases in natural flash flooding and landslide disasters in the context of climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(2), pages 557-582, March.
    2. Donaldson, Ross & Lord, Richard, 2018. "Can brownfield land be reused for ground source heating to alleviate fuel poverty?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 344-355.
    3. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    4. Gunwoo Kim, 2016. "Assessing Urban Forest Structure, Ecosystem Services, and Economic Benefits on Vacant Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Chunlin Li & Miao Liu & Yuanman Hu & Tuo Shi & Min Zong & M. Todd Walter, 2018. "Assessing the Impact of Urbanization on Direct Runoff Using Improved Composite CN Method in a Large Urban Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Manal Osman & Khamaruzaman Wan Yusof & Husna Takaijudin & Hui Weng Goh & Marlinda Abdul Malek & Nor Ariza Azizan & Aminuddin Ab. Ghani & Abdurrasheed Sa’id Abdurrasheed, 2019. "A Review of Nitrogen Removal for Urban Stormwater Runoff in Bioretention System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Livia Bonciarelli & Fabio Orlandi & Desirée Muscas & Marco Fornaciari, 2025. "Sustainable Stormwater Management and Bioretention: An Overview of Reviews of the Last 10 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tripathy, Prajukta & Jena, Pabitra Kumar & Mishra, Bikash Ranjan, 2024. "Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Florin Achim & Lucian Dinca & Danut Chira & Razvan Raducu & Alexandru Chirca & Gabriel Murariu, 2025. "Sustainable Management of Willow Forest Landscapes: A Review of Ecosystem Functions and Conservation Strategies," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, August.
    3. Maribel Vega-Arce & Gonzalo Salas & Gastón Núñez-Ulloa & Cristián Pinto-Cortez & Ivelisse Torres Fernandez & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Research performance and trends in child sexual abuse research: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1505-1525, December.
    4. Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero & María Elena Parra-González & Jesús López-Belmonte & Adrián Segura-Robles, 2022. "Science mapping analysis of “cultural” in web of science (1908–2019)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 239-257, February.
    5. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Güler Koştı & İsmail Kayadibi, 2025. "A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for human resource management," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    8. Corsini, Alberto & Pezzoni, Michele, 2023. "Does grant funding foster research impact? Evidence from France," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    9. Ruchi Arora & Meera Kapoor & Nidhi Singh & Muhammad Zafar Yaqub, 2025. "Green cryptocurrency and business strategies: Framework and insights from a stewardship literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 804-829, January.
    10. Marek Kwiek & Wojciech Roszka, 2022. "Academic vs. biological age in research on academic careers: a large-scale study with implications for scientifically developing systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3543-3575, June.
    11. Vanessa Sandoval-Romero & Vincent Larivière, 2020. "The national system of researchers in Mexico: implications of publication incentives for researchers in social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 99-126, January.
    12. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    13. Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin & Azyyati Anuar & Preecha Wararatchai & Natapat Areerakulkan & Wissawa Aunyawong, 2025. "Drivers and Constraints of Remanufacturing: A Global Bibliometric Review," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(4), pages 141-163.
    14. Anh Viet Tran & Bui Thanh Khoa, 2025. "Systematic Review of Blockchain Business Applications and the Metaverse," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    15. Mike Thelwall, 2020. "Mid-career field switches reduce gender disparities in academic publishing," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(3), pages 1365-1383, June.
    16. Patricia de Oliveira Melo & Renata Marques Britto & Tharcisio Cotta Fontainha & Adriana Leiras & Renata Albergaria de Mello Bandeira, 2017. "Evaluation of community leaders’ perception regarding Alerta Rio, the warning system for landslides caused by heavy rains in Rio de Janeiro," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(3), pages 1343-1368, December.
    17. Nasrabadi, Mohamadreza Azar & Beauregard, Yvan & Ekhlassi, Amir, 2024. "The implication of user-generated content in new product development process: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes & Parisa Ziarati & Pablo de Frutos Madrazo & Iza Gigauri, 2025. "Digital Marketing as a Driver of Change Towards the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Mansoureh Beheshti Nejad & Seyed Mahmoud Zanjirchi & Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan & Negar Jalilian, 2024. "Blockchain Adoption in Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review of 14 Years of Research," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 1361-1389, August.
    20. Hongyu Chen & Jiachen Peng & Lufei Huang, 2025. "AIGC Technology in the Fintech Sector: An Analysis of Theme Evolution Based on the BERTopic Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12906-:d:937732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.