Author
Listed:
- Zhanerke Bolatova
(Department of Science, Kazakh National University of Water Management and Irrigation, Taraz 080000, Kazakhstan
School of Public Health, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan)
- Riza Sharapatova
(Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Astana Medical University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)
- Kaltay Kanagat
(Department of Science, Kazakh National University of Water Management and Irrigation, Taraz 080000, Kazakhstan)
- Yerlan Kabiyev
(Faculty of Civil and Agricultural Sciences, Atyrau University Named After Kh. Dosmukhamedov, Atyrau 060000, Kazakhstan)
- Ronny Berndtsson
(Division of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden)
- Kamshat Tussupova
(Department of Science, Kazakh National University of Water Management and Irrigation, Taraz 080000, Kazakhstan)
Abstract
Background: Access to safe and reliable water and sanitation remains a critical public health and development challenge, with rural and low-income communities being disproportionately affected by inadequate services and heightened exposure to waterborne diseases. Despite global efforts and infrastructure-based progress indicators, significant disparities persist, and these often overlook users’ perceptions of water quality, reliability, and safety. This study explores the determinants of household satisfaction with drinking water in rural areas, comparing subjective user feedback with official access data to reveal gaps in current monitoring approaches and support more equitable, user-centered water governance. Methods: This study was conducted in Kazakhstan’s Atyrau Region, where 1361 residents from 86 rural villages participated in a structured survey assessing household access to drinking water and perceptions of its quality. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression to identify key predictors of user satisfaction, with results compared against official records to evaluate discrepancies between reported experiences and administrative data. Results: The field survey results revealed substantial discrepancies between official statistics and residents’ reports, with only 58.1% of respondents having in-house tap water access despite claims of universal coverage. Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified key predictors of user satisfaction, showing that uninterrupted supply and the absence of complaints about turbidity, odor, or taste significantly increased the likelihood of higher satisfaction levels with drinking water quality. Conclusions: This study underscores the critical need to align official water access statistics with household-level experiences, revealing that user satisfaction—strongly influenced by supply reliability and sensory water quality—is essential for achieving equitable and effective rural water governance.
Suggested Citation
Zhanerke Bolatova & Riza Sharapatova & Kaltay Kanagat & Yerlan Kabiyev & Ronny Berndtsson & Kamshat Tussupova, 2025.
"Household Satisfaction and Drinking Water Quality in Rural Areas: A Comparison with Official Access Data,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7107-:d:1718279
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7107-:d:1718279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.