IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6141-d1694682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Implementing CCUS Supply Chains at National Scale: Insights from Different Targeted Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Tuan B. H. Nguyen

    (Center for Hi-Tech Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Saigon Hi-Tech Park, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
    VKTECH Research Center, NTT Hi-Tech Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, 298-300A Nguyen Tat Thanh Street, Ward 13, District 4, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Grazia Leonzio

    (Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

Abstract

The establishment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage supply chains at the national level is crucial for meeting global decarbonization targets: they have been suggested as a solution to maintain the global temperature rise below 2 °C relative to preindustrial levels. Optimizing these systems requires a balance of economic viability with environmental impact, but this is a challenge due to diverse operational limitations. This paper introduces an optimization framework that integrates life cycle assessment with a source-sink model while combining the geographical storage and conversion pathways of carbon dioxide into high-value chemicals. This study explores the economic and environmental outcomes of national carbon capture, utilization, and storage networks, considering several constraints, such as carbon dioxide reduction goals, product market demand, and renewable hydrogen availability. The framework is utilized in Germany as a case study, presenting three case studies to maximize overall annual profit and life cycle greenhouse gas reduction. In all analyzed scenarios, the results indicate a clear trade-off between profitability and emission reductions: profit-driven strategies are characterized by increased emissions, while environmental strategies have higher costs despite the environmental benefit. In addition, cost-optimal cases prefer high-profit utilization routes (e.g., gasoline through methane reforming) and cost-effective capture technologies, leading to significant profitability. On the other hand, climate-optimal approaches require diversification, integrating carbon dioxide storage with conversion pathways that exhibit lower emissions (e.g., gasoline, acetic acid, methanol through carbon dioxide hydrogenation). The proposed method significantly contributes to developing and constructing more sustainable, large-scale carbon projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuan B. H. Nguyen & Grazia Leonzio, 2025. "Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Implementing CCUS Supply Chains at National Scale: Insights from Different Targeted Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6141-:d:1694682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Zhu, Xuancan & Shi, Yixiang & Cai, Ningsheng, 2016. "Integrated gasification combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture by elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 196-208.
    3. Lee, Suh-Young & Lee, In-Beum & Han, Jeehoon, 2019. "Design under uncertainty of carbon capture, utilization and storage infrastructure considering profit, environmental impact, and risk preference," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 34-44.
    4. Wassermann, Timo & Muehlenbrock, Henry & Kenkel, Philipp & Zondervan, Edwin, 2022. "Supply chain optimization for electricity-based jet fuel: The case study Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Zhang, Shuai & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Lei & Zhuang, Yu & Du, Jian, 2018. "An optimization model for carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain: A case study in Northeastern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 194-206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & Li, Sheng & Wang, Dan, 2022. "A comprehensive evaluation model for full-chain CCUS performance based on the analytic hierarchy process method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    2. Liu, Bingsheng & Liu, Song & Xue, Bin & Lu, Shijian & Yang, Yang, 2021. "Formalizing an integrated decision-making model for the risk assessment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage projects: From a sustainability perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    3. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Xiang, Yue & Guo, Yongtao & Wu, Gang & Liu, Junyong & Sun, Wei & Lei, Yutian & Zeng, Pingliang, 2022. "Low-carbon economic planning of integrated electricity-gas energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Yu Wang & Tianfu Xu & Yuxiang Cheng & Guanhong Feng, 2022. "Prospects for Power Generation of the Doublet Supercritical Geothermal System in Reykjanes Geothermal Field, Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Leszek Pająk & Anna Sowiżdżał & Paweł Gładysz & Barbara Tomaszewska & Maciej Miecznik & Trond Andresen & Bjørn S. Frengstad & Anna Chmielowska, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Studies and Assessment Supporting the Selection of Locations and Technologies Used in CO 2 -EGS Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Wang, Sijia & Jiang, Lanlan & Cheng, Zucheng & Liu, Yu & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2021. "Experimental study on the CO2-decane displacement front behavior in high permeability sand evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Adrien Nicolle & Diego Cebreros & Olivier Massol & Emma Jagu, 2023. "Modeling CO2 pipeline systems: An analytical lens for CCS regulation," Post-Print hal-04297191, HAL.
    9. Chong Meng & Siyang Zhou & Wei Li, 2021. "An Optimization Model for Water Management under the Dual Constraints of Water Pollution and Water Scarcity in the Fenhe River Basin, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Wang, Peng-Tao & Wei, Yi-Ming & Yang, Bo & Li, Jia-Quan & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liu, Lan-Cui & Yu, Bi-Ying & Hou, Yun-Bing & Zhang, Xian, 2020. "Carbon capture and storage in China’s power sector: Optimal planning under the 2 °C constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    11. Schifflechner, Christopher & de Reus, Jasper & Schuster, Sebastian & Corpancho Villasana, Andreas & Brillert, Dieter & Saar, Martin O. & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2024. "Paving the way for CO2-Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems: A perspective on the CO2 surface equipment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    12. Shalini Kumari & Sasadhar Bera, 2023. "Developing an emission risk control model in coal‐fired power plants for investigating CO2 reduction strategies for sustainable business development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 842-857, January.
    13. Zhang, Rongda & Wei, Jing & Zhao, Xiaoli & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Economic and environmental benefits of the integration between carbon sequestration and underground gas storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Arnob Das & Susmita Datta Peu, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advancements in Thermochemical Processes for Clean Hydrogen Production to Decarbonize the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-42, September.
    15. Yiwei Wu & Hongyu Zhang & Shuaian Wang & Lu Zhen, 2023. "Mathematical Optimization of Carbon Storage and Transport Problem for Carbon Capture, Use, and Storage Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Qasem, Naef A.A. & Ben-Mansour, Rached & Habib, Mohamed A., 2018. "An efficient CO2 adsorptive storage using MOF-5 and MOF-177," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 317-326.
    17. Abdoli, B. & Hooshmand, F. & MirHassani, S.A., 2023. "A novel stochastic programming model under endogenous uncertainty for the CCS-EOR planning problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    18. Holz, Franziska & Scherwath, Tim & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Skar, Christian & Olmos, Luis & Ploussard, Quentin & Ramos, Andrés & Herbst, Andrea, 2021. "A 2050 perspective on the role for carbon capture and storage in the European power system and industry sector," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 104, pages 1-18.
    19. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    20. Kang, Charles A. & Brandt, Adam R. & Durlofsky, Louis J. & Jayaweera, Indira, 2016. "Assessment of advanced solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture processes using a bi-objective optimization technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1209-1219.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6141-:d:1694682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.