IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5955-d1689888.html

Insight into Global Bio-Based Plastics Development: A Bibliometric Analysis-Aided Assessment of the Past Decades’ Research Exploit

Author

Listed:
  • Nonso E. Nnolim

    (Patho-Biocatalysis Group (PBG), Department of Biotechnology and Biological Sciences, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa)

  • Uchechukwu U. Nwodo

    (Patho-Biocatalysis Group (PBG), Department of Biotechnology and Biological Sciences, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa)

Abstract

The global biobased plastics market is on an upward trajectory due to the quest for a clean/sustainable environment and the growing concerns over climate change. This study used a meta-analysis approach to investigate the global trend in the research evolution and development of bio-based plastics research from 1990 to 2023. The publication records of 2742 articles were retrieved from the Web of Science data collection using the following key terms: “bioplastic* or biodegradable plastic* or biobased plastic* or biodegradable polyester* or biobased polyester* or biodegradable polyethylene* or biobased polyethylene*”. The analysis showed that scientific productivity generally increased across the spectrum of the survey timelines, with the highest publication of 331 articles recorded in 2023. The articles were published in 863 sources by 10,408 authors, with an annual growth rate of 13.55%. China demonstrated the highest number of publications recorded, with 404 articles within the survey period, followed by the United States, with 303 articles. The international collaboration was recorded at 20.86%, while the average citation per article was 27.99. The swift advancement in biodegradable plastic research, as indicated by relevant metrics, highlights the current research trends and underscores the importance of bio-based plastics in promoting a sustainable environment and a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nonso E. Nnolim & Uchechukwu U. Nwodo, 2025. "Insight into Global Bio-Based Plastics Development: A Bibliometric Analysis-Aided Assessment of the Past Decades’ Research Exploit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5955-:d:1689888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teplitskiy, Misha & Duede, Eamon & Menietti, Michael & Lakhani, Karim R., 2022. "How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duede, Eamon & Teplitskiy, Misha & Lakhani, Karim & Evans, James, 2024. "Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    2. Sam Arts & Nicola Melluso & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2023. "Beyond Citations: Measuring Novel Scientific Ideas and their Impact in Publication Text," Papers 2309.16437, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    3. Kyriakos Drivas & Arsenios-Georgios N. Prelorentzos & Georgios Spais, 2025. "Unbundling science: the impact of the internet on knowledge dissemination and spillovers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(11), pages 6289-6303, November.
    4. Adam Ploszaj, 2025. "Individual-level determinants of international academic mobility: insights from a survey of Polish scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(4), pages 2273-2290, April.
    5. Qiu, Shumin & Steinwender, Claudia & Azoulay, Pierre, 2025. "Who stands on the shoulders of Chinese (Scientific) Giants? Evidence from chemistry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    6. Misha Teplitskiy & Soya Park & Neil Thompson & David Karger, 2022. "Intentional and serendipitous diffusion of ideas: Evidence from academic conferences," Papers 2209.01175, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    7. Brooks, Chris & Schopohl, Lisa & Tao, Ran & Walker, James & Zhu, Millie, 2025. "The female finance penalty: Why are women less successful in academic finance than related fields?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    8. Nápoles-Vértiz, Sonia & Caro-Borrero, Angela, 2024. "Conceptual diversity and application of ecosystem services and disservices: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Ruonan Cai & Wencan Tian & Rundong Luo & Zhichao Fang & Zhigang Hu, 2025. "Do articles with multiple corresponding authorships have a citation advantage? A double machine learning analysis approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2523-2550, May.
    10. Buchner, Martin & Rose, Julian & Johannesson, Magnus & Malan, Mandy & Ankel-Peters, Jörg, 2025. "Seeking Scientific Consensus - An Expert Survey on the Replication Debate between Acemoglu et al. (2001) and Albouy (2012)," I4R Discussion Paper Series 270, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    11. Yi-Shuai Xu & A. M. K. Yanti Idaya & Muhammad Shahreeza Safiruz Kassim, 2025. "First to know: profiling readers of early-access articles in the field of AI," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(11), pages 6747-6774, November.
    12. Valentina De Simone & Valentina Di Pasquale & Maria Elena Nenni & Salvatore Miranda, 2023. "Sustainable Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Contexts: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Linming Xu & Baicun Li & Shuo Chen & Meijuan Li, 2025. "Research productivity and novelty under different funding models: evidence from NIH-funded research projects," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3743-3771, July.
    14. Karel Hrazdil & Jeong-Bon Kim & Frederick H. Willeboordse, 2024. "Systematic bias in citing practices: evidence from accounting journal additions to the FT list," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(11), pages 6947-6973, November.
    15. Maura Mezzetti & Ilia Negri, 2024. "Hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate and compare research productivity of Italian academic statisticians," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7443-7474, December.
    16. Ayushi Tandon & Swanand J. Deodhar & Abhas Tandon & Abhinav Tripathi, 2025. "Does David Make A Goliath? Impact of Rival’s Expertise Signals on Online User Engagement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 1054-1077, June.
    17. Qiu, Shumin & Steinwender, Claudia & Azoulay, Pierre, 2025. "Paper tiger? Chinese science and home bias in citations," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Honglin Bao & Misha Teplitskiy, 2024. "A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Guoqiang Liang & Yaqin Li & Lurui Song & Chaoguang Huo, 2023. "Magnitude decrease of the Matthew effect in citations: a study based on Nobel Prize articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(12), pages 6357-6371, December.
    20. Thomas Delcey & Aurélien Goutsmedt & Alexandre Truc, 2025. "One Sentence at a Time: A Quantitative History of Rationality in Economic Thought," Working Papers hal-05431080, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5955-:d:1689888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.