IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5785-d1685777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crumb Rubber (CR) and Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)-Modified Asphalt Pavement Assessment: A Mechanical, Environmental, and Life Cycle Cost Analysis Study

Author

Listed:
  • Maram Saudy

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Minas Guirguis

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Ayman Saeed

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Abdallah Elshenawy

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Farida Elkaramany

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Nadeen Dawoud

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Darwish

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Mohamed AbouZeid

    (Department of Construction Engineering, The American University in Cairo (AUC), AUC Avenue, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

Abstract

Due to the growing consumption of plastic and rubber products, effective waste management solutions are crucial. This study evaluates the use of crumb rubber (CR), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and their combination (CR+LDPE), as asphalt binder modifiers for improving pavement performance and sustainability. The analyses covered two critical pavement layers: the wearing surface (WS) and the treated base (TB). The methodology included (1) Binder Development and Testing; (2) Superpave Mix Design; (3) mechanical testing, including Indirect Tensile Strength Testing and Semi-Circular Bending Testing; (4) life cycle cost analysis; and (5) carbon footprint analysis. The results revealed that CR+LDPE significantly enhanced the fatigue resistance of the TB mixes, with a fracture energy increase of 47%, and increased the flexibility index by 53% in the WS. CR increased the flexibility index by about 146% in the TB layer, while LDPE increased the fracture energy by 21% in the WS layer. The life cycle cost analysis demonstrated that using LDPE, CR, and CR+LDPE reduced the life cycle costs by about 16% in the WS layer. Meanwhile, the life cycle carbon footprint analysis showed that using LDPE and CR+LDPE reduced the carbon footprint by about 87% and 81% for the TB and WS layers, respectively. The study findings highlight the mechanical, economic, and environmental benefits of incorporating wastes into asphalt pavements.

Suggested Citation

  • Maram Saudy & Minas Guirguis & Ayman Saeed & Abdallah Elshenawy & Farida Elkaramany & Nadeen Dawoud & Mohamed Darwish & Mohamed AbouZeid, 2025. "Crumb Rubber (CR) and Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)-Modified Asphalt Pavement Assessment: A Mechanical, Environmental, and Life Cycle Cost Analysis Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5785-:d:1685777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5785/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5785/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5785-:d:1685777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.