Author
Listed:
- Luís Catarino
(Instituto Superior de Agronomia, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)
- João Rolim
(A LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food-Research Center, Associated Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Paula Paredes
(A LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food-Research Center, Associated Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Maria do Rosário Cameira
(A LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food-Research Center, Associated Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)
Abstract
This study presents a robust methodology for the indirect estimation of groundwater abstraction for irrigation at the scale of individual wells, addressing a key gap in data-scarce agricultural settings. The approach combines NDVI time series, crop water requirement modelling, and spatial analysis of irrigation systems within a GIS environment. A soil water balance model was applied to Homogeneous Units of Analysis, and irrigation requirements were estimated using an ensemble approach accounting for key sources of uncertainty related to phenology detection, soil moisture at sowing (%SAW), and irrigation system efficiency. A spatial linkage algorithm was developed to associate individual wells with the irrigated areas they supply. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that 10% increases in %SAW resulted in abstraction reductions of up to 1.98%, while 10% increases in irrigation efficiency reduced abstractions by an average of 6.48%. These findings support the inclusion of both parameters in the ensemble, generating eight abstraction estimates per well. Values ranged from 33,000 to 115,000 m 3 for the 2023 season. Validation against flowmeter data confirmed the method’s reliability, with an R 2 of 0.918 and an RMSE equivalent to 9.3% of the mean observations. This approach offers an accurate, spatially explicit estimation of groundwater abstractions without requiring direct metering and offers a transferable, cost-effective tool to improve groundwater accounting and governance in regions with limited monitoring infrastructure.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5618-:d:1681965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.