IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4701-d1660139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revitalizing Inner Areas Through Thematic Cultural Routes and Multifaceted Tourism Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Annarita Sannazzaro

    (Institute of Heritage Science, National Research Council (ISPC-CNR), Area della Ricerca, C. da S. Loja, snc, 85050 Potenza, Italy)

  • Stefano Del Lungo

    (Institute of Heritage Science, National Research Council (ISPC-CNR), Area della Ricerca, C. da S. Loja, snc, 85050 Potenza, Italy)

  • Maria Rosaria Potenza

    (Institute of Heritage Science, National Research Council (ISPC-CNR), Area della Ricerca, C. da S. Loja, snc, 85050 Potenza, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Terenzio Gizzi

    (Institute of Heritage Science, National Research Council (ISPC-CNR), Area della Ricerca, C. da S. Loja, snc, 85050 Potenza, Italy)

Abstract

Cultural tourism can act as a driver for inner area development, bringing about a range of socio-economic benefits through economic stimulation, quality of life improvement, and cultural heritage preservation. Inner territories, set apart by geographic marginality and low population density, hold a rich cultural and environmental heritage that, however, remains off the radar and left behind. Guided by the principles of endogenous local development, this article seeks to contribute to the existing body of research by proposing potential strategies for local growth rooted in cultural tourism. From this perspective, we identified the Basilicata region (Southern Italy) as a proper test area. The region is rich in archaeological, monumental and museum evidence, but is characterized, except in a few areas, by a low rate of tourist turnout. Through a replicable, comprehensive, and flexible methodology—drawing on bibliographic research, analysis of archaeological, archival, erudite and antiquarian sources, and carrying out field surveys—the different points of interest in the region have been brought together under specific cultural themes. Results include the design of three detailed routes (Via Herculia , Frederick II’s, and St Michael’s cultural routes) useful for three different types of tourism (sustainable, emotional, and accessible). Possible scenarios for valorization and fruition are also proposed, paying particular attention to digital technologies. Thus, this research aligns with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8 and 11 promoting cultural heritage valorization and preservation, shoring up economic revitalization, stepping up community engagement, and pushing forward environmentally friendly tourism practices. Research findings can attract the interest of a wide range of stakeholders such as tourism professionals, local authorities, cultural and creative industries, local communities and entrepreneurs, as well as academics and researchers. The methodological approach can be considered for the valorization and tourist enjoyment of inner areas in other countries, with particular focus on those falling within the Mediterranean region which is rich in cultural heritage, environmental value, and socio-economic potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Annarita Sannazzaro & Stefano Del Lungo & Maria Rosaria Potenza & Fabrizio Terenzio Gizzi, 2025. "Revitalizing Inner Areas Through Thematic Cultural Routes and Multifaceted Tourism Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-33, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4701-:d:1660139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Ruggiero Sardaro & Piermichele La Sala, 2022. "Recovery and Resilience of the Inner Areas: Identifying Collective Policy Actions through PROMETHEE II," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Sdrali, Despina & Chazapi, Katerina, 2007. "Cultural Tourism In A Greek Insular Community: The Residents’ Perspective," MPRA Paper 6368, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Despina Sdrali & Maria Goussia-Rizou & Pinelopi Kiourtidou, 2015. "Residents’ perception of tourism development as a vital step for participatory tourism plan: a research in a Greek protected area," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 923-939, August.
    2. María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo & José Álvarez-García & Amador Durán-Sánchez, 2020. "Cultural and Natural Resources in Tourism Island: Bibliometric Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Lucia Rocchi & Lorenzo Negri & Lea Piscitelli, 2025. "Evaluating the Progress of the EU Countries Towards Implementation of the European Green Deal: A Multiple Criteria Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Alexandra Lappa & Evangelia Georgitsoyanni, 2016. "Integrating Cultural Heritage into Contemporary Life. The Perspective of Local Communities: The Case of Arcadia, Greece," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(1), pages 39-49.
    5. Jorge Ridderstaat & Robertico Croes, 2013. "The Force Field of Tourism," Review of Economic Analysis, Digital Initiatives at the University of Waterloo Library, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Mildred Samukelisiwe Nkwanyana & Ikechukwu .O. Ezeuduji & Antonia Thandi Nzama, 2016. "Cultural Heritage Tourism in South Africa: Perceived a Panacea for Rural Development?," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 12(6), pages 160-167, DECEMBER.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4701-:d:1660139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.