IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4500-d1656425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Sustainable Construction Industry: A Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of Critical Barriers to Entry and the Retention of Women in the South African Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin

    (School of Art, Design and Architecture, Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
    Cidb Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Abimbola Windapo

    (Department of Construction Economics and Management, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

  • João Alencastro

    (School of Art, Design and Architecture, Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

  • Muhammad Qasim Rana

    (Construction Management, University College of Estate Management, Horizons, 60 Queen’s Road, Reading RG1 4BS, UK)

  • Christiana Ekpo

    (Department of Construction Economics and Management, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

  • Lekan Damilola Ojo

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Over the past few decades, numerous efforts have been made to increase the proportion of women in the construction industry, coupled with various calls for legislation and rules to prohibit gender discrimination. Despite these efforts, minimal progress has been noticed in the construction industry. While recruitment remains crucial, the current culture in construction reveals a knowledge gap in recruitment and retention in employment—a concept known as a ‘leaky pipeline’. Lack of awareness of career options and the challenges of working in a male-dominated, occasionally discriminatory workplace are some of the significant barriers to attracting and keeping women in the construction industry. Much of the research in South Africa shows that most construction companies employed few women but only in lower secretarial and administrative positions. Therefore, this study investigated the barriers facing women’s entry and retention in construction-related employment in South Africa using fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) to understand and prioritise the barriers. Data were collected through the administration of online and paper-based questionnaires. The results of the analysis show that the barriers in the order of criticality include support and empowerment issues (SEs), educational/academic-related barriers (ABs), barriers from professional conditions and work attributes (BPs), social perception and gender stereotype barriers (SPs), professional perceptions and gender bias (PP), and individual confidence/interest/awareness/circumstance-related barriers (IBs), respectively. Based on the findings of the study, several recommendations, including on-the-job tutoring and flexible work arrangements, amongst others, were provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin & Abimbola Windapo & João Alencastro & Muhammad Qasim Rana & Christiana Ekpo & Lekan Damilola Ojo, 2025. "Towards a Sustainable Construction Industry: A Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of Critical Barriers to Entry and the Retention of Women in the South African Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4500-:d:1656425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4500-:d:1656425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.