IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4341-d1653358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gaming Polarisation: Using Agent-Based Simulations as a Dialogue Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Shaoni Wang

    (Groningen Center for Social Complexity Studies, University of Groningen, Hoendiepskade 23/24, 9718 BG Groningen, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wander Jager

    (Groningen Center for Social Complexity Studies, University of Groningen, Hoendiepskade 23/24, 9718 BG Groningen, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Transitioning to sustainable systems often faces significant challenges. People from different backgrounds often have different views on sustainability, which may lead to group polarisation. To promote collective participation in the transition to sustainability, it is critical to understand the drivers of polarisation and promote inclusiveness in decision-making. We developed a Dialogue Tool based on the HUMAT framework to explore opinion dynamics such as polarisation in the community and find potential pathways to reconcile when division occurs. By simulating dissatisfaction, division, and reconciliation in the community, we studied how individual characteristics (such as openness to change and assertiveness) affect collective decisions. Furthermore, the Dialogue Tool can be used to test possible interventions to reduce polarisation and increase community satisfaction. Visual representations of community dynamics under different scenarios within the Dialogue Tool have the potential to foster meaningful dialogues among stakeholders, which may promote a deeper reflection on community collaboration. While limitations such as simplifications and lack of empirical calibration limit the predictive accuracy of the Dialogue Tool (although this is not its goal), it still shows strong potential for educational and policy applications. It offers insights into social influences, conformity, and polarisation in community settings, making it a promising tool for fostering inclusive, informed decision-making and strengthening community participation in sustainable development transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaoni Wang & Wander Jager, 2025. "Gaming Polarisation: Using Agent-Based Simulations as a Dialogue Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4341-:d:1653358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Le Page & Nicolas Becu & Pierre Bommel & François Bousquet, 2012. "Participatory Agent-Based Simulation for Renewable Resource Management: The Role of the Cormas Simulation Platform to Nurture a Community of Practice," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10.
    2. Shauhrat S. Chopra & Sachini Supunsala Senadheera & Pavani Dulanja Dissanayake & Piumi Amasha Withana & Rajeev Chib & Jay Hyuk Rhee & Yong Sik Ok, 2024. "Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Lettieri, 2016. "Computational Social Science, the Evolution of Policy Design and Rule Making in Smart Societies," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Foteini I. Pagkalou & Konstantinos I. Liapis & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2024. "Defining the Total CSR Z-Score: A Methodological Approach Using Regulations, Standards and Guidelines Through Application to the Greek Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-28, November.
    3. Costantiello, Alberto & Drago, Carlo & Arnone, Massimo & Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "Regional Research Intensity and ESG Indicators in Italy: Insights from Panel Data Models and Machine Learning," MPRA Paper 124185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Eid M Alotaibi & Ashraf Khallaf & Abed Al-Nasser Abdallah & Taisier Zoubi & Awwad Alnesafi, 2024. "Blockchain-Driven Carbon Accountability in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-30, December.
    5. Talan, Gaurav & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Pereira, Vijay & Muschert, Glenn W., 2024. "From ESG to holistic value addition: Rethinking sustainable investment from the lens of stakeholder theory," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    6. Joffre, Olivier M. & Bosma, Roel H. & Ligtenberg, Arend & Tri, Van Pham Dang & Ha, Tran Thi Phung & Bregt, Arnold K., 2015. "Combining participatory approaches and an agent-based model for better planning shrimp aquaculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 149-159.
    7. Zahra Adardour & Slimane Ed-Dafali & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Omar El Mortagi & Hicham Sbai & Brahim Bouzahir, 2025. "Exploring the drivers of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in an emerging market context using a mixed methods approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Iman Babiker & Mashael Bakhit & Aida Osman Abdalla Bilal & Ayman Abdalla Mohammed Abubakr & Abubkr Ahmed Elhadi Abdelraheem, 2025. "The Effect of Female Representation on Boards on Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Highly Polluting Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Frank Oswald & Seyedeh Azadeh Alavi-Borazjani & Michelle Adams & Fátima Lopes Alves, 2025. "Too Much of a Good Thing? Navigating the Abundance of E&S Metrics in Ports’ Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Paget, Nicolas & Le Gal, Pierre-Yves & Goulet, Frédéric, 2024. "Motivations and challenges of intrapreneurship in research organizations. The case of decision support systems in agricultural research for development," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Rizzati, Massimiliano & Landoni, Matteo, 2024. "A systematic review of agent-based modelling in the circular economy: Insights towards a general model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 617-631.
    12. Xiao Wang & Feng Sun & Min Gyeong Kim & Hyung Jong Na, 2025. "Developing a Novel Audit Risk Metric Through Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Serhiy Zabolotnyy, 2024. "Investigating the Nexus Between Energy Transition Reporting Practices and Corporate Efficiency in the European Agri-Food Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Erasmia Angelaki & Alexandros Garefalakis & Markos Kourgiantakis & Ioannis Sitzimis & Ioannis Passas, 2025. "ESG Integration and Green Computing: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Martinčević, Ivana & Primorac, Dinko & Dorić, Barbara, 2025. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD): Obligations, Challenges and Requirements for Companies," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2024), Hybrid Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Hybrid Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 5-7 September, 2024, pages 317-327, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    16. Weining Wang & Qi Zhang & Jia Hao, 2024. "How Does Green Factory Certification Affect Corporate Sustainability Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Sanjeev Yadav & Ashutosh Samadhiya & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Krishan Kumar Pandey, 2025. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting and Missing (M) Scores in the Industry 5.0 Era: Broadening Firms' and Investors' Decisions to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3455-3477, June.
    18. Ying Bai & Zerui Wang & Qi Huang & Haoming Ding, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Value in Listed Sports Companies: The Mediating Role of Intangible Assets and Moderating Role of Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4341-:d:1653358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.