IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1910-d1346162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cobalt Supply Chain and Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jani Das

    (Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Andrew Kleiman

    (Energy and Earth Resources Graduate Program, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Atta Ur Rehman

    (Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Rahul Verma

    (Fractal Business Analytics LLC, Austin, TX 78735, USA)

  • Michael H. Young

    (Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) deployed in battery energy storage systems (BESS) can reduce the carbon intensity of the electricity-generating sector and improve environmental sustainability. The aim of this study is to use life cycle assessment (LCA) modeling, using data from peer-reviewed literature and public and private sources, to quantify environmental impacts along the supply chain for cobalt, a crucial component in many types of LIBs. The study seeks to understand where in the life cycle stage the environmental impacts are highest, thus highlighting actions that can be taken to improve sustainability of the LIB supply chain. The system boundary for this LCA is cradle-to-gate. Impact assessment follows ReCiPe Midpoint (H) 2016. We assume a 30-year modeling period, with augmentation occurring at the end of the 3rd, 7th, and 14th years of operations, before a complete replacement in the 21st year. Three refinery locations (China, Canada, and Finland), a range of ore grades, and five battery chemistries (NMC111, NMC532, NMC622, NMC811, and NCA) are used in scenarios to better estimate their effect on the life cycle impacts. Insights from the study are that impacts along nearly all pathways increase according to an inverse power-law relationship with ore grade; refining outside of China can reduce global warming potential (GWP) by over 12%; and GWP impacts for cobalt used in NCA and other NMC battery chemistries are 63% and 45–74% lower than in NMC111, respectively. When analyzed on a single-score basis, marine and freshwater ecotoxicity are prominent. For an ore grade of 0.3%, the GWP values for the Canada route decrease at a rate of 58% to 65%, and those for Finland route decrease by 71% to 76% from the base case. Statistical analysis shows that cobalt content in the battery is the highest predictor (R 2 = 0.988), followed by the ore grade (R 2 = 0.966) and refining location (R 2 = 0.766), when assessed for correlation individually. The results presented here point to areas where environmental burdens of LIBs can be reduced, and thus they are helpful to policy and investment decision makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jani Das & Andrew Kleiman & Atta Ur Rehman & Rahul Verma & Michael H. Young, 2024. "The Cobalt Supply Chain and Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1910-:d:1346162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmidt, Tobias & Buchert, Matthias & Schebek, Liselotte, 2016. "Investigation of the primary production routes of nickel and cobalt products used for Li-ion batteries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 107-122.
    2. Kolahchian Tabrizi, Mehrshad & Bonalumi, Davide & Lozza, Giovanni Gustavo, 2024. "Analyzing the global warming potential of the production and utilization of lithium-ion batteries with nickel-manganese-cobalt cathode chemistries in European Gigafactories," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozdemir, Ali Can & Buluş, Kurtuluş & Zor, Kasım, 2022. "Medium- to long-term nickel price forecasting using LSTM and GRU networks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Marco Vacchi & Cristina Siligardi & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2024. "Driving Manufacturing Companies toward Industry 5.0: A Strategic Framework for Process Technological Sustainability Assessment (P-TSA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Xiao, Lu & Ouyang, Yu & Lin, Qiang & Guo, Yujuan, 2024. "Cooperative recycling strategy for electric vehicle batteries considering blockchain technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    4. Liu, Wei & Li, Xin & Liu, Chunyan & Wang, Minxi & Liu, Litao, 2023. "Resilience assessment of the cobalt supply chain in China under the impact of electric vehicles and geopolitical supply risks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Mehrshad Kolahchian Tabrizi & Tarcisio Cerri & Davide Bonalumi & Tommaso Lucchini & Morris Brenna, 2024. "Retrofit of Diesel Engines with H 2 for Potential Decarbonization of Non-Electrified Railways: Assessment with Lifecycle Analysis and Advanced Numerical Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Fernando Fusco Rovai & Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian Mady, 2024. "Thermodynamic Model for Cold-Phase Influence on Light Vehicles’ Fuel Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Wesselkämper, Jannis & Dahrendorf, Laureen & Mauler, Lukas & Lux, Simon & von Delft, Stephan, 2024. "Towards circular battery supply chains: Strategies to reduce material demand and the impact on mining and recycling," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Ren, Zhijun & Li, Huajie & Yan, Wenyi & Lv, Weiguang & Zhang, Guangming & Lv, Longyi & Sun, Li & Sun, Zhi & Gao, Wenfang, 2023. "Comprehensive evaluation on production and recycling of lithium-ion batteries: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1910-:d:1346162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.