IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11161-d1547816.html

Integrating Scientific and Stakeholder-Based Knowledge to Simulate Future Urban Growth Scenarios: Findings from Kurunegala and Galle, Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Farasath Hasan

    (Department of Town & Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

  • Amila Jayasinghe

    (Department of Town & Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

  • Chethika Abenayake

    (Department of Town & Country Planning, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

Abstract

The promotion of sustainability and resilience within urban environments is widely recognized as an essential approach to educating urban communities through innovative strategies and tools. This paper presents a process for integrating stakeholders into urban growth simulation, thereby enhancing sustainable decision-making. Currently, most urban growth models fail to incorporate the perspectives of diverse stakeholders, leading to reduced equitable participation in the decision-making process. To achieve long-term sustainability, it is imperative to include the input and viewpoints of stakeholders. This study follows a four-step approach: identifying relevant stakeholders, developing the framework, evaluating its effectiveness, and documenting lessons learned. The framework involves key steps, including initial participatory modeling, analysis of development pressures and suitability with stakeholders, and technical urban growth modeling. A unique combination of modeling tools and an innovative approach was employed, incorporating the default FUTURES (GRASS-GIS) model alongside the CA-Markov Chain, Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) (NetLogo), the Cellular-Automata-based Python model, and MOLUSCE-QGIS. This integrated approach facilitates the inclusion of stakeholder-based knowledge into conventional urban growth modeling, providing novel local lessons in science, technology, and innovation initiatives. Validation was conducted through both technical and stakeholder mechanisms, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Farasath Hasan & Amila Jayasinghe & Chethika Abenayake, 2024. "Integrating Scientific and Stakeholder-Based Knowledge to Simulate Future Urban Growth Scenarios: Findings from Kurunegala and Galle, Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11161-:d:1547816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Firoozeh Karimi & Selima Sultana, 2024. "Urban Expansion Prediction and Land Use/Land Cover Change Modeling for Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Zhang, Honghui & Zeng, Yongnian & Jin, Xiaobin & Shu, Bangrong & Zhou, Yinkang & Yang, Xuhong, 2016. "Simulating multi-objective land use optimization allocation using Multi-agent system—A case study in Changsha, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 334-347.
    3. Nyamekye, Clement & Kwofie, Samuel & Ghansah, Benjamin & Agyapong, Emmanuel & Boamah, Linda Appiah, 2020. "Assessing urban growth in Ghana using machine learning and intensity analysis: A case study of the New Juaben Municipality," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Cohen, Barney, 2004. "Urban Growth in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Trends and a Caution Regarding Existing Forecasts," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 23-51, January.
    5. Robert Newell & Ian Picketts & Ann Dale, 2020. "Community systems models and development scenarios for integrated planning: Lessons learned from a participatory approach," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 261-282, May.
    6. Iga Solecka & Dietmar Bothmer & Arkadiusz Głogowski, 2019. "Recognizing Landscapes for the Purpose of Sustainable Development—Experiences from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenhao Zhu & Jonah Susskind & Mario Giampieri & Hazel Backus O’Neil & Alan M. Berger, 2023. "Optimizing Sustainable Suburban Expansion with Autonomous Mobility through a Parametric Design Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Wang, Bo & Li, Fan & Feng, Shuyi & Shen, Tong, 2020. "Transfer of development rights, farmland preservation, and economic growth: a case study of Chongqing’s land quotas trading program," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T. & Ortiz, Danica Aisa P. & Go, John Juliard & Duante, Charmaine & Gonzales, Rosa C. & Mendoza, Laurita R. & Reyes, Clarissa & Elgo, Frances Rose & Aldeon, Melanie P., 2012. "Inequities in Noncommunicable Diseases," Discussion Papers DP 2012-04, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    5. Sean Fox & Robin Bloch & Jose Monroy, 2018. "Understanding the dynamics of Nigeria’s urban transition: A refutation of the ‘stalled urbanisation’ hypothesis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 947-964, April.
    6. Philippe Bocquier, 2004. "World Urbanization Prospects : an alternative to the UN model of projection compatible with urban transition theory," Working Papers DT/2004/08, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    7. Zhiwei Deng & Bin Quan, 2022. "Intensity Characteristics and Multi-Scenario Projection of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Hengyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Gurgel, Angelo Costa, 2007. "Trade Agreements and their Impacts on the Familiar Agriculture in Brazil," Conference papers 331587, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. José Armando Cobián Álvarez & Budy P. Resosudarmo, 2019. "The cost of floods in developing countries’ megacities: a hedonic price analysis of the Jakarta housing market, Indonesia," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(4), pages 555-577, October.
    10. Zac Coates & Michelle Kelly & Scott Brown, 2024. "The Relationship between Climate Anxiety and Pro-Environment Behaviours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Willem Paling, 2012. "Planning a Future for Phnom Penh: Mega Projects, Aid Dependence and Disjointed Governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(13), pages 2889-2912, October.
    12. Michail Fragkias & Karen C Seto, 2007. "Modeling Urban Growth in Data-Sparse Environments: A New Approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(5), pages 858-883, October.
    13. Carmen Lizarraga & Ciro Jaramillo & Alejandro L. Grindlay, 2011. "Urban development and transport disadvantage: Methodology to evaluate social transport needs in Latin American cities," ERSA conference papers ersa11p936, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Chen, Shaohua & Ravallion, Martin, 2007. "Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981-2004," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4211, The World Bank.
    15. Sara T Borgström, 2009. "Patterns and Challenges of Urban Nature Conservation—A Study of Southern Sweden," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2671-2685, November.
    16. Jing Yao & Xiaoxiang Zhang & Alan T. Murray, 2018. "Spatial Optimization for Land-use Allocation," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(6), pages 579-600, November.
    17. Aman Gupta & Bhaskar De & Anoop Kumar Shukla & Gloria Pignatta, 2024. "Vulnerability Assessment of a Highly Populated Megacity to Ambient Thermal Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Fox, Sean & Wolf, Levi John, 2022. "What makes a place urban?," SocArXiv qfvry, Center for Open Science.
    19. Quddus Tushar & Guomin Zhang & Satheeskumar Navaratnam & Muhammed A. Bhuiyan & Lei Hou & Filippo Giustozzi, 2023. "A Review of Evaluative Measures of Carbon-Neutral Buildings: The Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-31, October.
    20. Huafang Huang & Sharafat Ali & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2023. "Analysis of the Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Environmental Sustainability in Developed and Developing Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11161-:d:1547816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.