IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10656-d1537064.html

International Regulatory Framework for Black Carbon Emissions from Arctic Shipping: Current Situation, Problems, and Development

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Yang

    (School of Humanities and Law, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Ziqing Zhang

    (School of Humanities and Law, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Zhiyuan Cui

    (Law School, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Siyang Cai

    (College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China)

Abstract

Black carbon, a short-lived climate forcer, has the dual impact of intensifying global warming and polluting the atmosphere. The further opening of Arctic shipping routes has resulted in a severe issue of black carbon emissions in this fragile region. The use of fuel, especially heavy fuel oil, in international shipping has generated enormous black carbon emissions, posing a serious threat to the climate in the Arctic and beyond. As the international community continues to pay attention to air pollution control and greenhouse gas emissions reduction, the need for effective global governance of black carbon emissions from Arctic shipping has become increasingly evident. This issue has emerged as a critical part of the broader effort to address ocean and climate governance through the lens of international law. Despite the efforts made by both the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the Arctic Council (AC) to reduce black carbon emissions, the current international legal framework remains fragmented, with weak enforcement mechanisms and limited capacity for coordinated governance. The findings of this research underscore the importance of strengthening international legal instruments aimed at reducing black carbon emissions from Arctic shipping. In particular, there is a pressing need for the development of a dedicated international treaty with enhanced binding force to mitigate the ecological degradation in the Arctic, address global warming, and realize sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Yang & Ziqing Zhang & Zhiyuan Cui & Siyang Cai, 2024. "International Regulatory Framework for Black Carbon Emissions from Arctic Shipping: Current Situation, Problems, and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10656-:d:1537064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harro Asselt & Fariborz Zelli, 2014. "Connect the dots: managing the fragmentation of global climate governance," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 16(2), pages 137-155, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergii Sagin & Valentin Chymshyr & Sergey Karianskyi & Oleksiy Kuropyatnyk & Volodymyr Madey & Dmytro Rusnak, 2025. "Using Ultrasonic Fuel Treatment Technology to Reduce Sulfur Oxide Emissions from Marine Diesel Exhaust Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-36, September.
    2. Abdillah, Sultan F.I. & You, Sheng-Jie & Wang, Jing & Wang, Ya-Fen, 2026. "Anthropogenic black carbon as short-lived climate pollutants: Critical advancements in global-regional monitoring, characterization, emission inventory, and impact analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    2. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, 2022. "Ordering global governance complexes: The evolution of the governance complex for international civil aviation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 293-322, April.
    3. Trisia A. Farrelly & Stephanie B. Borrelle & Sascha Fuller, 2021. "The Strengths and Weaknesses of Pacific Islands Plastic Pollution Policy Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-36, January.
    4. Choyon Kumar Saha, 2024. "Least developed countries versus fossil fuel incumbents: strategies, divisions, and barriers at the United Nations climate negotiations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 91-120, March.
    5. Cille Kaiser, 2022. "Rethinking polycentricity: on the North–South imbalances in transnational climate change governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 693-713, December.
    6. Ann Garth & Timmons Roberts, 2022. "Economic framing dominates climate policy reporting: a fifty-state analysis," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Philipp Pattberg & Cille Kaiser & Oscar Widerberg & Johannes Stripple, 2022. "20 Years of global climate change governance research: taking stock and moving forward," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 295-315, June.
    8. Mark Purdon, 2015. "Advancing Comparative Climate Change Politics: Theory and Method," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Heubaum, Harald & Biermann, Frank, 2015. "Integrating global energy and climate governance: The changing role of the International Energy Agency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 229-239.
    10. Thomas Hickmann & Joshua Philipp Elsässer, 0. "New alliances in global environmental governance: how intergovernmental treaty secretariats interact with non-state actors to address transboundary environmental problems," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    11. Jens Heidingsfelder & Markus Beckmann, 2020. "A governance puzzle to be solved? A systematic literature review of fragmented sustainability governance," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 355-390, August.
    12. Yunhao Yao & Chen Li & Yujie Zhao & Ruoquan Zheng & Merle Parmak, 2025. "Fragmentation of China’s Yacht Industry Policy: A Three-Dimensional Framework Based on Policy Purposes, Instruments, and Subjects," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    13. Sam Taveirne & Ben Derudder, 2024. "Overcoming gridlock? The role of city networks in transnational cooperation on climate mitigation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(4), pages 644-659, September.
    14. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 2020. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 393-410, June.
    15. Defne Gonenc & Dario Piselli & Yixian Sun, 2020. "The global economic system and access and allocation in earth system governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 223-238, June.
    16. Athar ud din, 2023. "Emerging Powers and Small Island Developing States: Leadership or Co-Option?," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 79(2), pages 244-263, June.
    17. Nimisha Pandey & Heleen de Coninck & Ambuj D Sagar, 2022. "Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    18. Chaewoon Oh, 2020. "Contestations over the financial linkages between the UNFCCC’s Technology and Financial Mechanism: using the lens of institutional interaction," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 559-575, September.
    19. Thomas Hickmann & Joshua Philipp Elsässer, 2020. "New alliances in global environmental governance: how intergovernmental treaty secretariats interact with non-state actors to address transboundary environmental problems," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 459-481, September.
    20. Astrid Carrapatoso & Angela Geck, 2018. "Multiple Wins, Multiple Organizations—How to Manage Institutional Interaction in Financing Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10656-:d:1537064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.