IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10205-d1526617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latent Class Analysis of Environmental Behavior and Psychological Well-Being: Insights into Sustainable Well-Being Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Ayşe Bostan

    (Business Administration, Gebze Technical University, Cumhuriyet, 2254. Sk. No: 2, 41400 Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey)

  • Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu

    (Business Administration, Gebze Technical University, Cumhuriyet, 2254. Sk. No: 2, 41400 Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey)

  • Meral Elçi

    (Business Administration, Gebze Technical University, Cumhuriyet, 2254. Sk. No: 2, 41400 Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey)

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between environmental behavior, job satisfaction, performance, and burnout using latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct behavioral patterns. Data were collected from 537 participants in various sectors, including education and health. Five latent classes were identified based on the participation of participants in sustainable practices. The analysis revealed significant differences in job satisfaction, with higher participation in sustainable behaviors generally associated with greater job satisfaction. Although performance remained stable across classes, burnout levels varied significantly, with some groups showing higher levels of stress and burnout and others demonstrating better psychological outcomes. The results confirm that sustainable behaviors are linked to psychological well-being, emphasizing the importance of fostering sustainability in the workplace to enhance employee well-being. The study highlights the need for targeted interventions to address burnout and promote sustainability in organizational settings. Future research should explore these dynamics longitudinally and across diverse occupational and cultural contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayşe Bostan & Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu & Meral Elçi, 2024. "Latent Class Analysis of Environmental Behavior and Psychological Well-Being: Insights into Sustainable Well-Being Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10205-:d:1526617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirk Brown & Tim Kasser, 2005. "Are Psychological and Ecological Well-being Compatible? The Role of Values, Mindfulness, and Lifestyle," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 349-368, November.
    2. Hicken, Margaret T. & Kravitz-Wirtz, Nicole & Durkee, Myles & Jackson, James S., 2018. "Racial inequalities in health: Framing future research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 11-18.
    3. Sergio Manuel Madero-Gómez & Yanira Lizeth Rubio Leal & Miguel Olivas-Luján & Mohd Yusoff Yusliza, 2023. "Companies Could Benefit When They Focus on Employee Wellbeing and the Environment: A Systematic Review of Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Ashlee Cunsolo & Neville R. Ellis, 2018. "Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 275-281, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Latha Poonamallee, 2025. "Countering Climate Fear with Mindfulness: A Framework for Sustainable Behavioral Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Jihad Mohammad & Farzana Quoquab, 2024. "The role of mindfulness and frugality in mitigating food waste and enhancing social well-being," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31601-31626, December.
    3. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Sylvestre, Paul & Castleden, Heather & Denis, Jeff & Martin, Debbie & Bombay, Amy, 2019. "The tools at their fingertips: How settler colonial geographies shape medical educators’ strategies for grappling with Anti-Indigenous racism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Sarah Koller, 2021. "Towards Degrowth? Making Peace with Mortality to Reconnect with (One's) Nature: An Ecopsychological Proposition for a Paradigm Shift," Environmental Values, , vol. 30(3), pages 345-366, June.
    6. Geurim Han & Junghwa Kim & Sun W. Park, 2018. "Extrinsic Value Orientation and Decreased Sustainability of Shared Resources: The Moderating Role of Situational Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Martín Bascopé & Kristina Reiss, 2021. "Place-Based STEM Education for Sustainability: A Path towards Socioecological Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Ericson, Torgeir & Kjønstad, Bjørn Gunaketu & Barstad, Anders, 2014. "Mindfulness and sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 73-79.
    9. Anuli Njoku & Marcelin Joseph & Rochelle Felix, 2021. "Changing the Narrative: Structural Barriers and Racial and Ethnic Inequities in COVID-19 Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Damien Chaney & Pascal Brassier, 2024. "Destruction of Heritage, Community and Anthropomorphism," Post-Print hal-04869831, HAL.
    11. Julia Bayuk & Hyunjung Crystal Lee & Jooyoung Park & Serkan Saka & Debabrata Talukdar & Jayati Sinha, 2022. "Mindfully aware and open: Mitigating subjective and objective financial vulnerability via mindfulness practices," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1284-1311, September.
    12. Hadassah Littman-Ovadia, 2019. "Doing–Being and Relationship–Solitude: A Proposed Model for a Balanced Life," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 1953-1971, August.
    13. Biglan, Anthony & Cody, Christine, 2013. "Integrating the human sciences to evolve effective policies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(S), pages 152-162.
    14. Welsch, Heinz, 2024. "Why is satisfaction from pro-environmental behaviors increasing in costs? Insights from the rational-choice decision-error framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Genovaitė Liobikienė & Mykolas Simas Poškus, 2019. "The Importance of Environmental Knowledge for Private and Public Sphere Pro-Environmental Behavior: Modifying the Value-Belief-Norm Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Manfred Lenzen & Robert A. Cummins, 2013. "Happiness versus the Environment—A Case Study of Australian Lifestyles," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Rosemary Hiscock & Pierpaolo Mudu & Matthias Braubach & Marco Martuzzi & Laura Perez & Clive Sabel, 2014. "Wellbeing Impacts of City Policies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-34, November.
    18. Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson & Alvin Chandra & Karen E. McNamara, 2023. "Stories of loss and healing: connecting non-economic loss and damage, gender-based violence and wellbeing erosion in the Asia–Pacific region," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(11), pages 1-34, November.
    19. Chaney, Damien & Brassier, Pascal, 2024. "Destruction of heritage, community and anthropomorphism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Erda Wang & Nannan Kang, 2019. "Does life satisfaction matter for pro-environmental behavior? Empirical evidence from China General Social Survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 449-469, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10205-:d:1526617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.