IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9903-d1520195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Challenges and Strategies in the Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Regeneration Projects: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Zakariye Mohamed Said

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, 06010 Ankara, Turkey)

  • Serdar Dindar

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, 06010 Ankara, Turkey)

Abstract

The rapid pace of urbanisation has heightened the need for sustainable urban regeneration projects on a global scale. These projects primarily aim to address the increasing demand for buildings and to cultivate liveable urban environments. Over the years, a substantial amount of data has been collected and analysed as a result of various urban regeneration efforts. These data indicate that the success of urban transformation is influenced by a wide range of interconnected factors rather than the mere creation of new areas to meet demand. The primary objective of this study is to carry out a comprehensive and systematic literature review that assesses the effectiveness of sustainable urban regeneration (SUR) projects. This review examines a range of existing factors, including policies, management practices, and economic considerations, while also highlighting frequently overlooked elements such as climate change. Moreover, the study investigates how these factors influence the success of SUR initiatives and seeks to identify their overall impact on the effectiveness of such projects. Specifically, it explores the common challenges encountered, the criteria for performance evaluation, and the strategies that lead to successful SUR projects while emphasising their interconnections. An in-depth assessment of urban regeneration projects is provided, focusing on performance indicators across multiple dimensions: social, cultural, economic, environmental, and physical. A novel organisation involving all stakeholders and addressing climate change is also proposed to ensure the success of the SUR projects. Lastly, the findings highlight existing gaps in the current literature, offering valuable insights for future research and identifying potential directions for further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Zakariye Mohamed Said & Serdar Dindar, 2024. "Key Challenges and Strategies in the Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Regeneration Projects: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-30, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9903-:d:1520195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Hui Lee & Sangyon Lim, 2018. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Sustainable Assessment of Economy-Based and Community-Based Urban Regeneration: The Case of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, November.
    2. María Ángeles Huete Garcia & Rafael Merinero Rodríguez & Rocío Muñoz Moreno, 2016. "Urban Regeneration Policy from the Integrated Urban Development Model in the European Union: an Analytical Approach Based on the Study of Spanish Cities," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 267-286, March.
    3. Brandt, Leslie & Derby Lewis, Abigail & Fahey, Robert & Scott, Lydia & Darling, Lindsay & Swanston, Chris, 2016. "A framework for adapting urban forests to climate change," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 393-402.
    4. Righi, Angela Weber & Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu & Wachs, Priscila, 2015. "A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 142-152.
    5. Fang He & Wendong Wu & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2019. "Exploring the Diverse Expectations of Stakeholders in Industrial Land Redevelopment Projects in China: The Case of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2015. "The Limits to Resilience? The Impact of Local Government Spending Cuts in London," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 582-600, July.
    7. Dariusz Młyński & Wiktor Halecki & Karolina Surowiec, 2024. "Urban Flood Modeling for Sustainability Management: Role of Design Rainfall and Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Yunxi Bai & Shanshan Wu & Yunjie Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Key Factors Influencing Sustainable Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Xun Zeng & Yuanchun Yu & San Yang & Yang Lv & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker, 2022. "Urban Resilience for Urban Sustainability: Concepts, Dimensions, and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Hongxun Xiang & Xia Heng & Boleng Zhai & Lichen Yang, 2024. "Digital and Culture: Towards More Resilient Urban Community Governance," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goran Janaćković & Žarko Vranjanac & Dejan Vasović, 2025. "Enhancing Urban Resilience: Integrating Actions for Resilience (A4R) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Sustainable Urban Development and Proactive Hazard Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Can Kara & Aminreza Iranmanesh, 2022. "Modelling and Assessing Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Historic Urban Quarters via Analytical Hierarchy Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Rubina Canesi, 2022. "Urban Policy Sustainability through a Value-Added Densification Tool: The Case of the South Boston Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Inés Álvarez-Melcón & Raffaele Sisto & Álvaro de Juanes Rodríguez & David Pereira, 2024. "Integrating the SDGs into Urban Regeneration: A Madrid Nuevo Norte Case Study Using an Adapted Voluntary Local Review Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-30, November.
    5. Yunxi Bai & Shanshan Wu & Yunjie Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Key Factors Influencing Sustainable Urban Renewal from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Ivan Blečić & Arnaldo Cecchini & Emanuel Muroni & Valeria Saiu & Serafino Scanu & Giuseppe Andrea Trunfio, 2023. "Addressing Peripherality in Italy: A Critical Comparison between Inner Areas and Territorial Capital-Based Evaluations," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Ayça Soygür & Naciye Doratlı, 2025. "Rethinking Local Development in Small-Scale Mediterranean Cities: Challenges, Gaps and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Jie Zhou & Wenyi Liu & Yu Lin & Benyong Wei & Yaohui Liu, 2024. "The Evaluation and Comparison of Resilience for Shelters in Old and New Urban Districts: A Case Study in Kunming City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Yifei Hu & Liu Wu & Ni Li & Tianwei Zhao, 2024. "Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Construction Engineering and Management: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Valente, Matteo & Ricci, Federica & Cozzani, Valerio, 2025. "A systematic review of Resilience Engineering applications to Natech accidents in the chemical and process industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Ayse Gertik & Aykut Karaman, 2023. "The Fractal Approach in the Biomimetic Urban Design: Le Corbusier and Patrick Schumacher," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Henrique Sala Benites & Paul Osmond & Deo Prasad, 2022. "A Future-Proof Built Environment through Regenerative and Circular Lenses—Delphi Approach for Criteria Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, December.
    13. Susanne Moser & Sara Meerow & James Arnott & Emily Jack-Scott, 2019. "The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 21-40, March.
    14. Siyu Li & Tian Xia & Yongrok Choi, 2025. "Does R&D Efficiency Hold the Key to Regional Resilience Under Sustainable Urban Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-37, October.
    15. Reena Tiwari & Courtney Babb & Marian Tye & Fatmaelzahraa Hussein, 2024. "The Wharf Street Smart Park Story: A Guide to Navigating Multi-Stakeholder Innovation in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Fatemeh Asghari & Farzad Piadeh & Daniel Egyir & Hossein Yousefi & Joseph P. Rizzuto & Luiza C. Campos & Kourosh Behzadian, 2023. "Resilience Assessment in Urban Water Infrastructure: A Critical Review of Approaches, Strategies and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Serkan Sipahi & Merve Sipahi, 2024. "Raw Material Stage Assessment of Seating Elements as Urban Furniture and Eco-Model Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Regina Veckalne & Tatjana Tambovceva, 2023. "Evaluating Urban Sustainability in Uzbekistan: A Novel Formula for Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    19. Ebrahim Farhadi & Ahmad Pourahmad & Keramatollah Ziari & Hassanali Faraji Sabokbar & Simona Tondelli, 2022. "Indicators Affecting the Urban Resilience with a Scenario Approach in Tehran Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Mateusz Hämmerling & Joanna Kocięcka & Stanisław Zaborowski, 2021. "AHP as a Useful Tool in the Assessment of the Technical Condition of Hydrotechnical Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9903-:d:1520195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.