IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9371-d1508804.html

Exploring Smart Mobility Potential in Kinshasa (DR-Congo) as a Contribution to Mastering Traffic Congestion and Improving Road Safety: A Comprehensive Feasibility Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Kazadi Kayisu

    (Faculté Polytechnique, Université de Kinshasa (UNIKIN), Kinshasa 15373, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Miroslava Mikusova

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Pitshou Ntambu Bokoro

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Kyandoghere Kyamakya

    (Faculté Polytechnique, Université de Kinshasa (UNIKIN), Kinshasa 15373, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Institute for Smart Systems Technologies, Universitaet Klagenfurt, Universitaetsstrasse 65, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria)

Abstract

The urban landscape of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, faces significant mobility challenges, primarily stemming from rapid urbanization, overpopulation, and outdated infrastructure. These challenges necessitate the exploration of modern smart mobility concepts to improve traffic flow, road safety, and sustainability. This study investigates the potential of solutions such as Mobility-as-a-Service, car sharing, micro-mobility, Vehicle-as-a-Service, and electric vehicles in addressing these challenges. Through a comparative analysis of global implementations, this research identifies key success factors and barriers that inform the feasibility of integrating these solutions into Kinshasa’s unique socio-political and infrastructural context. The study presents a conceptual framework, supported by stakeholder analysis, for adapting these solutions locally. A detailed feasibility analysis considers technological, economic, social, environmental, and regulatory factors, offering a clear roadmap for implementation. Drawing on lessons from cities facing similar urban mobility challenges, the paper concludes with actionable recommendations and insights for policymakers and urban planners in Kinshasa. This research not only highlights the viability of smart mobility solutions in Kinshasa but also contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable urban development in rapidly growing cities. While smart mobility studies have largely focused on cities with developed infrastructure, there is a gap in understanding how these solutions apply to cities like Kinshasa with different infrastructural and socio-political contexts. Previous research has often overlooked the challenges of integrating smart mobility in rapidly urbanizing cities with underdeveloped transportation systems and financial constraints. This study fills that gap by offering a feasibility analysis tailored to Kinshasa, assessing smart mobility solutions for its traffic congestion and road safety issues. The smart mobility solutions studied—Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS), car sharing, electric vehicles (EVs), and micro-mobility—were chosen for their ability to address Kinshasa’s key mobility challenges. MaaS reduces reliance on private vehicles, easing congestion and improving public transport. Car sharing offers affordable alternatives to vehicle ownership, essential in a city with income inequality. EVs align with sustainability goals by reducing emissions, while micro-mobility (bikes and e-scooters) improves last-mile connectivity, addressing public transit gaps. These solutions are adaptable to Kinshasa’s context and offer scalable, sustainable improvements for urban mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Kazadi Kayisu & Miroslava Mikusova & Pitshou Ntambu Bokoro & Kyandoghere Kyamakya, 2024. "Exploring Smart Mobility Potential in Kinshasa (DR-Congo) as a Contribution to Mastering Traffic Congestion and Improving Road Safety: A Comprehensive Feasibility Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-53, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9371-:d:1508804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yinheng Li & Shaofei Wang & Han Ding & Hang Chen, 2023. "Large Language Models in Finance: A Survey," Papers 2311.10723, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    2. Kfir Noy & Moshe Givoni, 2018. "Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Auwal Alhassan Musa & Salim Idris Malami & Fayez Alanazi & Wassef Ounaies & Mohammed Alshammari & Sadi Ibrahim Haruna, 2023. "Sustainable Traffic Management for Smart Cities Using Internet-of-Things-Oriented Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): Challenges and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongshen Sun & Juanjuan Zhang, 2025. "From Model Choice to Model Belief: Establishing a New Measure for LLM-Based Research," Papers 2512.23184, arXiv.org.
    2. Heejoo Son & Jinhyeok Jang & Jihan Park & Akos Balog & Patrick Ballantyne & Heeseo Rain Kwon & Alex Singleton & Jinuk Hwang, 2025. "Leveraging Advanced Technologies for (Smart) Transportation Planning: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-35, March.
    3. Tanja Manders & Elke Klaassen, 2019. "Unpacking the Smart Mobility Concept in the Dutch Context Based on a Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Hazel Si Min Lim & Araz Taeihagh, 2019. "Algorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Haoyi Zhang & Tianyi Zhu, 2025. "Neither Consent nor Property: A Policy Lab for Data Law," Papers 2510.26727, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    6. Olin, Janne J. & Mladenović, Miloš N., 2025. "The governance of emerging mobility technologies in Finland: A Q-methodology study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Marco Mazzarino & Lucio Rubini, 2019. "Smart Urban Planning: Evaluating Urban Logistics Performance of Innovative Solutions and Sustainable Policies in the Venice Lagoon—the Results of a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Masoud Khanmohamadi & Marco Guerrieri, 2025. "Smart Intersections and Connected Autonomous Vehicles for Sustainable Smart Cities: A Brief Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-32, April.
    9. Weixian Waylon Li & Hyeonjun Kim & Mihai Cucuringu & Tiejun Ma, 2025. "Can LLM-based Financial Investing Strategies Outperform the Market in Long Run?," Papers 2505.07078, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    10. Joel R. Bock, 2024. "Generating long-horizon stock "buy" signals with a neural language model," Papers 2410.18988, arXiv.org.
    11. Nazmus Sakib & A. S. M. Bakibillah & Md Abdus Samad Kamal & Kou Yamada, 2025. "Incentive-Based Peak Demand Regulation with Intelligent Parking Management for Enhanced Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Arsalan Raza & Muhammad Umair Ali & Ubaid Ullah & Muhammad Fayaz & Muhammad Junaid Alvi & Karam Dad Kallu & Amad Zafar & Sarvar Hussain Nengroo, 2022. "Evaluation of a Sustainable Urban Transportation System in Terms of Traffic Congestion—A Case Study in Taxila, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Tianyi Zhang & Mu Chen, 2025. "Personalized Chain-of-Thought Summarization of Financial News for Investor Decision Support," Papers 2511.05508, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    14. Katsiaryna Bahamazava, 2024. "AI-Driven Scenarios for Urban Mobility: Quantifying the Role of ODE Models and Scenario Planning in Reducing Traffic Congestion," Papers 2410.19915, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    15. Junhee Kang & Sehyun Tak & Sungjin Park, 2023. "Analyzing the Impact of C-ITS Services on Driving Behavior: A Case Study of the Daejeon–Sejong C-ITS Pilot Project in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Husnain Mushtaq & Xiaoheng Deng & Mubashir Ali & Babur Hayat & Hafiz Husnain Raza Sherazi, 2023. "DFA-SAT: Dynamic Feature Abstraction with Self-Attention-Based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Jinzhong Xu & Junyi Gao & Xiaoming Liu & Guan Yang & Jie Liu & Yang Long & Ziyue Huang & Kai Yang, 2025. "CPEL: A Causality-Aware, Parameter-Efficient Learning Framework for Adaptation of Large Language Models with Case Studies in Geriatric Care and Beyond," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Fabrizio Dimino & Bhaskarjit Sarmah & Stefano Pasquali, 2026. "Risk-Adjusted Harm Scoring for Automated Red Teaming for LLMs in Financial Services," Papers 2603.10807, arXiv.org.
    19. Sebastian Kussl & Andreas Wald, 2022. "Smart Mobility and its Implications for Road Infrastructure Provision: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Benjamin Coriat & Eric Benhamou, 2025. "HARLF: Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning and Lightweight LLM-Driven Sentiment Integration for Financial Portfolio Optimization," Papers 2507.18560, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9371-:d:1508804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.