IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p7968-d1476548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of the Restorative Benefits of Different Spaces in an Urban Riverside Greenway for College Students—A Simple Autumn Outdoor Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Chunyan Zhu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Jingzhu Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Jinming Luo

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Xi Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Tianhui Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Shanshan Fu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Weizhen Zeng

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

Greenways are important natural environment places in cities, which have a great restorative effect on human physiological and mental health. The restoration effect of urban greenways on the physical and mental health of urban residents is affected by the type of greenway space. In order to reveal the restorative effects of different types of urban waterfront greenway spaces on the human body and explore restorative environmental factors, this paper firstly used the expert survey method to construct an AHP (analytic hierarchy process) model, which yielded three types of criterion-level indicators and eight types of sub-indicators. Second, taking Nanxun Avenue Greenway in Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China, as an example, it was divided into three types of greenway spaces—waterfront space, underwood space, and lawn space—on the basis of field surveys. A total of 30 subjects participated in this outdoor experience and collected their physiological and psychological data. The results of the experiment showed that all three types of spaces in the Nanxun Avenue Greenway had a restorative effect on human physical and mental health, and all of them were effective in lowering blood pressure and heart rate, as well as eliminating negative emotions and increasing positive emotions for most of the participants. The waterfront space had the best restorative effect, followed by the underwood space and the lawn space. The main restorative environmental factors differed among each of the three types of spaces. This paper provides insights and examples for exploring the restorative benefits of urban greenways.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunyan Zhu & Jingzhu Li & Jinming Luo & Xi Li & Tianhui Li & Wei Wang & Shanshan Fu & Weizhen Zeng, 2024. "An Investigation of the Restorative Benefits of Different Spaces in an Urban Riverside Greenway for College Students—A Simple Autumn Outdoor Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7968-:d:1476548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Zhang & Suyan Liu & Song Liu, 2021. "Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Landscape Features of Urban Community Parks on Health-Related Feelings of Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Liang Li & Xinyue Gao & Jingni Li & Lu Meng & Ziyao Wang & Lu Yang, 2022. "Difference of Usage Behavior between Urban Greenway and Suburban Greenway: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Jongwook Tae & Daeyoung Jeong & Jinhyung Chon, 2022. "How Can Apartment-Complex Landscaping Space Improve Residents’ Psychological Well-Being?: The Case of the Capital Region in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Huiyun Peng & Xiangjin Li & Tingting Yang & Shaohua Tan, 2023. "Research on the Relationship between the Environmental Characteristics of Pocket Parks and Young People’s Perception of the Restorative Effects—A Case Study Based on Chongqing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Weiting Shan & Chunliang Xiu & Yining Meng, 2022. "How to Design Greenway on Urban Land Utilization: Linking Place Preference, Perceived Health Benefit, and Environmental Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Rovelli, Roberto & Senes, Giulio & Fumagalli, Natalia & Sacco, Jessica & De Montis, Andrea, 2020. "From railways to greenways: a complex index for supporting policymaking and planning. A case study in Piedmont (Italy)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Junga Lee & Hyung-Sook Lee & Daeyoung Jeong & C. Scott Shafer & Jinhyung Chon, 2019. "The Relationship between User Perception and Preference of Greenway Trail Characteristics in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Ming Ma & Liang Ding & Huaiyun Kou & Shaohua Tan & Hao Long, 2021. "Effects and Environmental Features of Mountainous Urban Greenways (MUGs) on Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Rong Fan & Ken P. Yocom & Yeyuan Guo, 2023. "Utilizing Fractal Dimensions as Indicators to Detect Elements of Visual Attraction: A Case Study of the Greenway along Lake Taihu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Daixin Dai & Mingyang Bo & Youmei Zhou, 2022. "How Do the Young Perceive Urban Parks? A Study on Young Adults’ Landscape Preferences and Health Benefits in Urban Parks Based on the Landscape Perception Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Shaohua Tan & Fengxiao Cao & Jinsu Yang, 2020. "The Study on Spatial Elements of Health-Supportive Environment in Residential Streets Promoting Residents’ Walking Trips," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-33, July.
    12. Xie, Bo & Pang, Zhe & He, Dongsheng & Lu, Yi & Chen, Yujie, 2023. "Effects of neighborhood environment on different aspects of greenway use: Evidence from East Lake Greenway, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Femke Beute & Yvonne De Kort & Wijnand IJsselsteijn, 2016. "Restoration in Its Natural Context: How Ecological Momentary Assessment Can Advance Restoration Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Jiang & Xin Li & Mingrui Wang & Xi Zhang & Wenhai Zhang & Yongjun Li & Xin Cong & Qinghai Zhang, 2025. "Multidimensional Visual Preferences and Sustainable Management of Heritage Canal Waterfront Landscape Based on Panoramic Image Interpretation," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Maria Elena Menconi & Rosaria Abbate & Giulia Ceccarelli & Anna Grassi & David Grohmann, 2023. "Rural Slow Routes as Connectors of Local Communities for the Promotion of Place Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Xiaolu Yang & Jingyi Zhang & Yueyang Yu & Xiu-Juan Qiao, 2024. "Behavioral Conflicts in Urban Greenway Recreation: A Case Study of the “Three Rivers and One Mountain” Greenway in Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Yulin Peng & Fan Zhang & Bing Qiu, 2025. "Research on the Evaluation of Service Effectiveness of Urban Greenways: Taking Municipal Greenways in the Main City of Nanjing as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Liang Li & Xinyue Gao & Jingni Li & Lu Meng & Ziyao Wang & Lu Yang, 2022. "Difference of Usage Behavior between Urban Greenway and Suburban Greenway: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Dušan Ristić & Danijela Vukoičić & Marko Ivanović & Milena Nikolić & Nikola Milentijević & Ljiljana Mihajlović & Dragan Petrović, 2024. "Transformation of Abandoned Railways into Tourist Itineraries/Routes: Model of Revitalization of Marginal Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Ye Sun & Wei Lu & Peijin Sun, 2021. "Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Vasile Gherheș & Ciprian Obrad, 2023. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Green Spaces and Daily Life in Small Urban Settings: Romanian Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Natalia Fumagalli & Matteo Maccarini & Roberto Rovelli & Rita Berto & Giulio Senes, 2020. "An Exploratory Study of Users’ Preference for Different Planting Combinations along Rural Greenways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Abdulrahman A. Zawawi & Nicole Porter & Christopher D. Ives, 2023. "Influences on Greenways Usage for Active Transportation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, July.
    11. Yingxue Wang & Jiaheng Du & Jingxing Kuang & Chunxu Chen & Maobiao Li & Jin Wang, 2023. "Two-Scaled Identification of Landscape Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Yunnan–Vietnam Railway (Yunnan Section), China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Jong-Won Lee & Sang-Woo Lee & Hai Gyong Kim & Hyun-Kil Jo & Se-Rin Park, 2023. "Green Space and Apartment Prices: Exploring the Effects of the Green Space Ratio and Visual Greenery," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Patricia Gual-Montolio & Verónica Martínez-Borba & Juana María Bretón-López & Jorge Osma & Carlos Suso-Ribera, 2020. "How Are Information and Communication Technologies Supporting Routine Outcome Monitoring and Measurement-Based Care in Psychotherapy? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Cong Gong & Xinyu Yang & Changjuan Hu & Xiaoming Gao, 2025. "Spatial Perception Differences in Mountain City Park for Youth Experience: A Case Study of Parks in Yuzhong District, Chongqing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Giulio Senes & Chiara Parretta & Natalia Fumagalli & Patrizia Tassinari & Daniele Torreggiani, 2023. "Soft Mobility Network for the Enhancement and Discovery of the Rural Landscape: Definition of a Masterplan for Alto Ferrarese (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Wen Wei & Ao Yang & Lanxi Jiang & Gillian Lawson & Wen Lei, 2025. "Ecological Recreation Across the Jinma Mountain Region: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Suburban Mountain Greenway Networks," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Qiu, Cailin & Cheng, Jianquan & Lu, Yi & Zhang, Tianjie, 2024. "Estimating exercisality on urban trails using physical exercise trajectory data and network-constrained approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    18. Misagh Mottaghi & Jonas Nordström & Salar Haghighatafshar & Karin Jönsson & Mattias Kärrholm & Catharina Sternudd, 2023. "Caring for Blue-Green Solutions (BGS) in Everyday Life: An Investigation of Recreational Use, Neighborhood Preferences and Willingness to Pay in Augustenborg, Malmö," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Honglin Wu & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Ni Zhang & Yilin Sun & Yue Tang & Xiaokang Wang & Chuang Cheng, 2023. "Evaluation and Optimization of Restorative Environmental Perception of Treetop Trails: The Case of the Mountains-to-Sea Trail, Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Yi Ren & Qiusheng Yang, 2023. "Research on the Factors Influencing the Perception of Urban Park Recreational Behavior Based on the “Homo Urbanicus” Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:7968-:d:1476548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.