IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5745-d1684909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Evaluation of Service Effectiveness of Urban Greenways: Taking Municipal Greenways in the Main City of Nanjing as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Yulin Peng

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Fan Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Bing Qiu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

As an important green infrastructure, urban greenways can provide a range of socio-ecological benefits and play an important role in improving the urban ecological environment and enhancing the quality of living. Currently, the relationship between service quality and the actual benefits of greenways has not been sufficiently explored in urban greenway research. This study introduces the concept of “efficiency”, determines service efficiency and service effectiveness as the evaluation dimensions, selects 4 first-level indicators and 12 second-level indicators to evaluate the service efficiency of greenways, and constructs an evaluation model using a combination of subjective and objective assignments. This study uses the overall service effectiveness index and the efficiency–effectiveness balance index to measure the overall performance of the greenway space in the hope of revealing the key factors and reasons that affect the service effectiveness of the greenway and providing a theoretical basis for optimizing the planning and management of the greenway. Using ArcGIS network analysis technology, image semantic segmentation technology, a questionnaire survey, network text analysis, and other methods to quantify the indicators, this paper conducts an empirical study on four municipal greenways in Nanjing. This research shows that the factors affecting the service effectiveness of greenways mainly include the landscape environment, greenway functions, transportation conditions, and supporting facility factors. The contradiction between the single-function positioning and the variety of user needs is the main reason for the imbalance between the efficiency and effectiveness of urban greenways. This study provides a new path to quantify greenway service effectiveness and enriches the greenway evaluation theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulin Peng & Fan Zhang & Bing Qiu, 2025. "Research on the Evaluation of Service Effectiveness of Urban Greenways: Taking Municipal Greenways in the Main City of Nanjing as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5745-:d:1684909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weiting Shan & Chunliang Xiu & Yining Meng, 2022. "How to Design Greenway on Urban Land Utilization: Linking Place Preference, Perceived Health Benefit, and Environmental Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Junga Lee & Hyung-Sook Lee & Daeyoung Jeong & C. Scott Shafer & Jinhyung Chon, 2019. "The Relationship between User Perception and Preference of Greenway Trail Characteristics in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Olivia S. Horte & Theodore S. Eisenman, 2020. "Urban Greenways: A Systematic Review and Typology," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Bin Xu & Qingxia Shi & Yaping Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation of the Health Promotion Capabilities of Greenway Trails: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Carlos Moreno & Zaheer Allam & Didier Chabaud & Catherine Gall & Florent Pratlong, 2021. "Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities," Post-Print hal-03549665, HAL.
    6. Wangshu Mu & Gusiyuan Wang, 2024. "Connective Urban Greenway Route Planning: A Spatial Optimization Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Yiyong Chen & Weiying Gu & Tao Liu & Lei Yuan & Mali Zeng, 2017. "Increasing the Use of Urban Greenways in Developing Countries: A Case Study on Wutong Greenway in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Jishu Huang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Research on Social Service Effectiveness Evaluation for Urban Blue Spaces—A Case Study of the Huangpu River Core Section in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang Li & Xinyue Gao & Jingni Li & Lu Meng & Ziyao Wang & Lu Yang, 2022. "Difference of Usage Behavior between Urban Greenway and Suburban Greenway: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Abdulrahman A. Zawawi & Nicole Porter & Christopher D. Ives, 2023. "Influences on Greenways Usage for Active Transportation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, July.
    3. Honglin Wu & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Ni Zhang & Yilin Sun & Yue Tang & Xiaokang Wang & Chuang Cheng, 2023. "Evaluation and Optimization of Restorative Environmental Perception of Treetop Trails: The Case of the Mountains-to-Sea Trail, Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Chunyan Zhu & Jingzhu Li & Jinming Luo & Xi Li & Tianhui Li & Wei Wang & Shanshan Fu & Weizhen Zeng, 2024. "An Investigation of the Restorative Benefits of Different Spaces in an Urban Riverside Greenway for College Students—A Simple Autumn Outdoor Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Daniela D’Alessandro & Andrea Rebecchi & Letizia Appolloni & Andrea Brambilla & Silvio Brusaferro & Maddalena Buffoli & Maurizio Carta & Alessandra Casuccio & Liliana Coppola & Maria Vittoria Corazza , 2023. "Re-Thinking the Environment, Cities, and Living Spaces for Public Health Purposes, According with the COVID-19 Lesson: The LVII Erice Charter," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Maria Pacheco & Helena Madureira & Ana Monteiro, 2024. "Examining Post-Pandemic Urban Transformations: A Literature Review on COVID-19’s Influence on Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-32, November.
    8. Bander Fahad Alkrides & Tracy Washington & Mark Limb & Debra Cushing, 2025. "Assessing Walkability in Riyadh’s Commercial Streets: Public Perceptions and Prioritization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, June.
    9. Xiaowen Wu & Xinru Li, 2025. "Multi-Source Data-Driven Quality Assessment of Waterfront Public Spaces in Urban Contexts," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Patrizia Sulis & Paola Proietti, 2024. "Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1650-1665, September.
    11. Beatrice Maria Bellè & Alessandro Deserti, 2024. "Urban Greening Plans: A Potential Device towards a Sustainable and Co-Produced Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Chrysa Vizmpa & George Botzoris & Panagiotis Lemonakis & Athanasios Galanis, 2023. "Micromobility in Urban Trail Paths: Expanding and Strengthening the Planning of 15-Minute Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Saveria Olga Murielle Boulanger, 2024. "Smart City and Energy: A Bibliometric Review of the Smart City and Smart Energy Concept from the Perspective of the Bioclimatic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Antonio Esteban-López & Agustín Castillo-Martínez & Antonio Peña-García, 2023. "Recovery of an Abandoned Singular Infrastructure as a Key Factor for Regional Sustainable Development; A Study Case: “ El Caminito del Rey ” [“The King’s Little Path”]," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Francesco Pinna & Valeria Saiu, 2021. "Greenways as Integrated Systems: A Proposal for Planning and Design Guidelines Based on Case Studies Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    17. Richard Smardon, 2020. "6th Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-2, November.
    18. Goyette, Jean-Olivier & Mendes, Poliana & Cimon-Morin, Jérôme & Dupras, Jérôme & Pellerin, Stéphanie & Rousseau, Alain N. & Poulin, Monique, 2024. "Using the ecosystem serviceshed concept in conservation planning for more equitable outcomes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Colaço, Rui & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2022. "Exploring the e-shopping geography of Lisbon: Assessing online shopping adoption for retail purchases and food deliveries using a 7-day shopping survey," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Xu Lu & Mengqin Zhu & Zeting Li & Qingyu Li & Shan Huang, 2025. "Urban Renewal Strategy Guided by Rail Transit Development Based on the “Node–Place–Revenue” Model: Case Study of Shenyang Metro Line 1," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5745-:d:1684909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.