IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5991-d567943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing Breakthrough Cancer Pain Using Ecological Momentary Assessment with a Smartphone App: Feasibility and Clinical Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Villegas

    (Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Pain and Radiotherapy Units, 12002 Castellón, Spain)

  • Verónica Martínez-Borba

    (Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain
    Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Carlos Suso-Ribera

    (Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain)

  • Diana Castilla

    (Department of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBERON), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Irene Zaragoza

    (CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBERON), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Azucena García-Palacios

    (Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain
    CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBERON), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carlos Ferrer

    (Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Pain and Radiotherapy Units, 12002 Castellón, Spain)

Abstract

Background: mobile applications (apps) facilitate cancer pain ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and provide more reliable data than retrospective monitoring. The aims of this study are (a) to describe the status of persons with cancer pain when assessed ecologically, (b) to analyze the utility of clinical alarms integrated into the app, and (c) to test the feasibility of implementing an app for daily oncological pain monitoring. Methods: in this feasibility study, 21 patients (mean age = 56.95 years, SD = 10.53, 81.0% men) responded to an app-based evaluation of physical status (baseline and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP)) and mental health variables (fatigue, mood, and coping) daily during 30 days. Results: cancer pain characterization with the app was similar to data from the literature using retrospective assessments in terms of BTcP duration and perceived medication effectiveness. However, BTcP was less frequent when evaluated ecologically. Pain, fatigue, and mood were comparable in the morning and evening. Passive coping strategies were the most employed daily. Clinical alarms appear to be useful to detect and address adverse events. App implementation was feasible and acceptable. Conclusion: apps reduce recall bias and facilitate a rapid response to adverse events in oncological care. Future efforts should be addressed to integrate EMA and ecological momentary interventions to facilitate pain self-management via apps.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Villegas & Verónica Martínez-Borba & Carlos Suso-Ribera & Diana Castilla & Irene Zaragoza & Azucena García-Palacios & Carlos Ferrer, 2021. "Characterizing Breakthrough Cancer Pain Using Ecological Momentary Assessment with a Smartphone App: Feasibility and Clinical Findings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5991-:d:567943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5991/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5991/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Suso-Ribera & Diana Castilla & Irene Zaragozá & Ángela Mesas & Anna Server & Javier Medel & Azucena García-Palacios, 2020. "Telemonitoring in Chronic Pain Management Using Smartphone Apps: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Usual Assessment against App-Based Monitoring with and without Clinical Alarms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Joshua Smyth & Arthur Stone, 2003. "Ecological Momentary Assessment Research in Behavioral medicine," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 35-52, March.
    3. Femke Beute & Yvonne De Kort & Wijnand IJsselsteijn, 2016. "Restoration in Its Natural Context: How Ecological Momentary Assessment Can Advance Restoration Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verónica Martínez-Borba & Carlos Suso-Ribera & Amanda Díaz-García & Judith Salat-Batlle & Diana Castilla & Irene Zaragoza & Azucena García-Palacios & Judit Sánchez-Raya, 2021. "mHealth for the Monitoring of Brace Compliance and Wellbeing in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis: Study Protocol for a Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Suso-Ribera & Diana Castilla & Irene Zaragozá & Ángela Mesas & Anna Server & Javier Medel & Azucena García-Palacios, 2020. "Telemonitoring in Chronic Pain Management Using Smartphone Apps: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Usual Assessment against App-Based Monitoring with and without Clinical Alarms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Rubin, Sara & Zimmer, Zachary, 2015. "Pain and self-assessed health: Does the association vary by age?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 259-267.
    3. Oliver Stanesby & Florian Labhart & Paul Dietze & Cassandra J C Wright & Emmanuel Kuntsche, 2019. "The contexts of heavy drinking: A systematic review of the combinations of context-related factors associated with heavy drinking occasions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Patricia Gual-Montolio & Verónica Martínez-Borba & Juana María Bretón-López & Jorge Osma & Carlos Suso-Ribera, 2020. "How Are Information and Communication Technologies Supporting Routine Outcome Monitoring and Measurement-Based Care in Psychotherapy? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Emily Panza & KayLoni Olson & Carly M. Goldstein & Edward A. Selby & Jason Lillis, 2020. "Characterizing Lifetime and Daily Experiences of Weight Stigma among Sexual Minority Women with Overweight and Obesity: A Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Laura S. Belmon & Vincent Busch & Maartje M. van Stralen & Dominique P.M. Stijnman & Lisan M. Hidding & Irene A. Harmsen & Mai J.M. Chinapaw, 2020. "Child and Parent Perceived Determinants of Children’s Inadequate Sleep Health. A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-35, February.
    7. Damaske, Sarah & Zawadzki, Matthew J. & Smyth, Joshua M., 2016. "Stress at work: Differential experiences of high versus low SES workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 125-133.
    8. Alexandra Drake & Bruce P. Doré & Emily B. Falk & Perry Zurn & Danielle S. Bassett & David M. Lydon-Staley, 2022. "Daily Stressor-Related Negative Mood and its Associations with Flourishing and Daily Curiosity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 423-438, February.
    9. Ana Fonseca & Jorge Osma, 2021. "Using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) for Mental Health Prevention and Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-5, January.
    10. Verónica Martínez-Borba & Carlos Suso-Ribera & Amanda Díaz-García & Judith Salat-Batlle & Diana Castilla & Irene Zaragoza & Azucena García-Palacios & Judit Sánchez-Raya, 2021. "mHealth for the Monitoring of Brace Compliance and Wellbeing in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis: Study Protocol for a Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Louis Tay & David Chan & Ed Diener, 2014. "The Metrics of Societal Happiness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 577-600, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5991-:d:567943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.