IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7207-d1461399.html

Achieving SOC Conservation without Land-Use Changes between Agriculture and Forests

Author

Listed:
  • Hari Prasad Pandey

    (Toowoomba Campus, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
    Department of Forests and Soil Conservation, Babarmahal, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal)

  • Tek Narayan Maraseni

    (Toowoomba Campus, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
    Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Armando Apan

    (Toowoomba Campus, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
    Institute of Environmental Science and Meteorology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines)

  • Shreejana Bhusal

    (Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Babarmahal, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal)

Abstract

Global land-use changes impact soil’s ability to perform essential functions. This study investigates whether soil organic carbon (SOC) can be conserved without altering land use in traditional farming systems and degraded natural forests, focusing on ‘disturbed’ agricultural soils and ‘undisturbed’ forest soils. We also examine the influence of dominant crops on SOC within the top 30 cm of soil in data-deficient regions of Nepal. Using a multi-stage cluster sampling design, we tested 12 regression models to identify the best relationships among variables such as SOC, soil bulk density (BD), pH, dominant crops, climate, topography, and management practices. Our analysis revealed similar SOC levels in both disturbed and undisturbed soils, indicating significant degradation in forested areas, whereas traditional farming systems could support SOC and preserve farm-based indigenous knowledge alongside food security. Further, SOC stocks varied significantly ( p < 0.05) across different cropping systems, suggesting that managing dominant crops could be a strategy to optimize SOC, with these crops serving as indicators. Additionally, our results show that the weak linear correlation between SOC and BD in regularly disturbed soils, such as farmlands, where anthropogenic activities frequently alter soil bulk density, may be misleading when estimating bulk density-dependent SOC. This finding suggests the need for further research into varying degrees of anthropogenic disturbance in soil to confirm these results. While the site-specific nature of the findings warrants caution with respect to generalization, they provide valuable insights for carbon monitoring, climate actions, ecosystem health, and land-use management in similar traditional farming systems and degraded forests, particularly in data-poor regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hari Prasad Pandey & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Armando Apan & Shreejana Bhusal, 2024. "Achieving SOC Conservation without Land-Use Changes between Agriculture and Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7207-:d:1461399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nuno Carvalhais & Matthias Forkel & Myroslava Khomik & Jessica Bellarby & Martin Jung & Mirco Migliavacca & Mingquan Μu & Sassan Saatchi & Maurizio Santoro & Martin Thurner & Ulrich Weber & Bernhard A, 2014. "Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7521), pages 213-217, October.
    2. Paudyal, Kiran & Baral, Himlal & Burkhard, Benjamin & Bhandari, Santosh P. & Keenan, Rodney J., 2015. "Participatory assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: Case study of community-managed forests in central Nepal," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 81-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hari Prasad Pandey & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Armando Apan & Han Zhang, 2025. "Review Articles on Ecological Resettlements: Insights, Gaps, and Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laxmi D. Bhatta & Sunita Chaudhary & Anju Pandit & Himlal Baral & Partha J. Das & Nigel E. Stork, 2016. "Ecosystem Service Changes and Livelihood Impacts in the Maguri-Motapung Wetlands of Assam, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Zhongen Niu & Huimin Yan & Fang Liu, 2020. "Decreasing Cropping Intensity Dominated the Negative Trend of Cropland Productivity in Southern China in 2000–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Yao Wang & Yimin Chen & Xinyuan Wang & Baiting Zhang & Yining Sun & Yuhan Zhang & Yuxuan Li & Yueyu Sui & Yingjie Dai, 2025. "Characteristics of the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of Soil Organic Matter in the Songnen Plain in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Hartmann, Johanna Zoe & Pearson, Jasmine, 2024. "Indigenous and local values of nature through a gender lens: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Zuming Cao & Xiaowei Luo & Xuemei Wang & Dun Li, 2025. "Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon Based on a Multivariate Feature Set and Stacking Ensemble Algorithm: A Case Study of Wei-Ku Oasis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Yonghua Li & Song Yao & Hezhou Jiang & Huarong Wang & Qinchuan Ran & Xinyun Gao & Xinyi Ding & Dandong Ge, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: An Integrated Framework Based on the MOP–PLUS–InVEST Model and an Applied Case Study in Hangzhou, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Kandel, Matt & Anghileri, Daniela & Alare, Rahinatu S. & Lovett, Peter N. & Agaba, Genevieve & Addoah, Thomas & Schreckenberg, Kate, 2022. "Farmers’ perspectives and context are key for the success and sustainability of farmer-managed natural regeneration (FMNR) in northeastern Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Savilaakso, Sini & Guariguata, Manuel R., 2017. "Challenges for developing Forest Stewardship Council certification for ecosystem services: How to enhance local adoption?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 55-66.
    9. Xiaobo Zhu & Honglin He & Mingguo Ma & Xiaoli Ren & Li Zhang & Fawei Zhang & Yingnian Li & Peili Shi & Shiping Chen & Yanfen Wang & Xiaoping Xin & Yaoming Ma & Yu Zhang & Mingyuan Du & Rong Ge & Na Ze, 2020. "Estimating Ecosystem Respiration in the Grasslands of Northern China Using Machine Learning: Model Evaluation and Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Andrea Früh-Müller & Stefan Hotes & Lutz Breuer & Volkmar Wolters & Thomas Koellner, 2016. "Regional Patterns of Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Efrén López-Blanco & Elmer Topp-Jørgensen & Torben R. Christensen & Morten Rasch & Henrik Skov & Marie F. Arndal & M. Syndonia Bret-Harte & Terry V. Callaghan & Niels M. Schmidt, 2024. "Towards an increasingly biased view on Arctic change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(2), pages 152-155, February.
    12. Piao Zhou & Lin Zhang & Shi Qi, 2022. "Plant Diversity and Aboveground Biomass Interact with Abiotic Factors to Drive Soil Organic Carbon in Beijing Mountainous Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, August.
    13. Eilola, Salla & Käyhkö, Niina & Fagerholm, Nora, 2021. "Lessons learned from participatory land use planning with high-resolution remote sensing images in Tanzania: Practitioners' and participants’ perspectives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Ram Prasad Acharya & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Geoff Cockfield, 2020. "An Ecosystem Services Valuation Research Framework for Policy Integration in Developing Countries: A Case Study from Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Saranjam M. Baig & Aftab A. Khan & Amjad Ali & Muhammad Zafar Khan & Sultan Ahmed & Ghulam M. Shah & Ghulam Ali, 2021. "Enhancing socioeconomic resilience and climate adaptation through value chain development of mountain products in Hindu Kush Himalayas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8451-8473, June.
    16. Shoyama, Kikuko & Kamiyama, Chiho & Morimoto, Junko & Ooba, Makoto & Okuro, Toshiya, 2017. "A review of modeling approaches for ecosystem services assessment in the Asian region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PB), pages 316-328.
    17. Yang, Y.C. Ethan & Passarelli, Simone & Lovell, Robin J. & Ringler, Claudia, 2018. "Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 58-67.
    18. Wenbo Cai & Tong Wu & Wei Jiang & Wanting Peng & Yongli Cai, 2020. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply–Demand and Spatial Relationships for Intercity Cooperation: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    19. Rui Qu & Li He & Zhengwei He & Bing Wang & Pengyi Lyu & Jiaxian Wang & Guichuan Kang & Wenqian Bai, 2022. "A Study of Carbon Stock Changes in the Alpine Grassland Ecosystem of Zoigê, China, 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Meli, Paula & Carlos Imio, Juan & Lisón, Fulgencio, 2024. "Tradeoffs in people’s perceptions about ecosystem services and disservices related to bats: Implications for managing agroecosystems and conserving bats," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7207-:d:1461399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.