IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6221-d1439452.html

Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects Run by Oil and Gas Companies: A Case Study from Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Cherepovitsyna

    (Luzin Institute for Economic Studies, Subdivision of the Federal Research Centre, Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity 184209, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Kuznetsova

    (Luzin Institute for Economic Studies, Subdivision of the Federal Research Centre, Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity 184209, Russia)

  • Aleksandr Popov

    (Research Institute “Environmental Industrial Policy Centre”, 42 Olimpijskij Prospect, Mytishchi 141006, Russia)

  • Dmitry Skobelev

    (Research Institute “Environmental Industrial Policy Centre”, 42 Olimpijskij Prospect, Mytishchi 141006, Russia)

Abstract

As oil and gas companies are one of the major greenhouse gas emitters, they face increasing responsibility to address climate challenges. This highlights the necessity of integrating decarbonization options into their operations to meet global climate objectives. While progress in technologies for capturing, utilizing, and storing CO 2 (CCUS technologies) is often attributed to oil and gas companies, CCUS projects in the sector predominantly focus on carbon storage, namely CO 2 injection for enhanced oil recovery, which presents limited possibilities. Meanwhile, carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies offer a promising avenue for producing valuable products from CO 2 , a potential that has been underexplored in theory and practice within the oil and gas sector. This study analyzes the development of the full CCU cycle by oil and gas companies, assessing the economic viability of such projects. It includes a content analysis of research materials on CCU deployment and a case study modeling the economic viability of producing methanol from CO 2 in Russia. The findings indicate that the estimated minimum price for CO 2 -based methanol to achieve project payback is USD 1128 per ton, compared to approximately USD 400 per ton for traditional methanol. This price gap underscores the need to foster the development of low-carbon technologies, markets, and measures to support these projects. In the domain of CCU projects, cost-reduction measures could be more applicable, while regulatory measures, such as carbon taxes, currently have a limited impact on the economic viability of these projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Cherepovitsyna & Ekaterina Kuznetsova & Aleksandr Popov & Dmitry Skobelev, 2024. "Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects Run by Oil and Gas Companies: A Case Study from Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6221-:d:1439452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chauvy, Remi & Meunier, Nicolas & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2019. "Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 662-680.
    2. Cameron Hepburn & Ella Adlen & John Beddington & Emily A. Carter & Sabine Fuss & Niall Mac Dowell & Jan C. Minx & Pete Smith & Charlotte K. Williams, 2019. "The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 87-97, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aryan Saxena & Jai Prakash Gupta & Janmejay Kumar Tiwary & Ashutosh Kumar & Saurav Sharma & Gaurav Pandey & Susham Biswas & Krishna Raghav Chaturvedi, 2024. "Innovative Pathways in Carbon Capture: Advancements and Strategic Approaches for Effective Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-32, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    2. Chang, Yuan & Gao, Siqi & Ma, Qian & Wei, Ying & Li, Guoping, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and utilization technologies and implications for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Mohammed Bin Afif & Abdulla Bin Afif & Harry Apostoleris & Krishiv Gandhi & Anup Dadlani & Amal Al Ghaferi & Jan Torgersen & Matteo Chiesa, 2022. "Ultra-Cheap Renewable Energy as an Enabling Technology for Deep Industrial Decarbonization via Capture and Utilization of Process CO 2 Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Ji, Yi-Zhuo & Kang, Jia-Ning & Liu, Lan-Cui & Tian, Xiao-Xi & Zhang, Yun-Long & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2025. "Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 401(PB).
    5. Koytsoumpa, E.I. & Magiri – Skouloudi, D. & Karellas, S. & Kakaras, E., 2021. "Bioenergy with carbon capture and utilization: A review on the potential deployment towards a European circular bioeconomy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Zhang, Zhien & Pan, Shu-Yuan & Li, Hao & Cai, Jianchao & Olabi, Abdul Ghani & Anthony, Edward John & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Chen, Siyuan & Liu, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Qi & Teng, Fei & McLellan, Benjamin C., 2022. "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Michael Carus & Lara Dammer & Achim Raschka & Pia Skoczinski, 2020. "Renewable carbon: Key to a sustainable and future‐oriented chemical and plastic industry: Definition, strategy, measures and potential," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(3), pages 488-505, June.
    11. Chu, Genyun & Fan, Yingjie & Zhang, Dawei & Gao, Minglin & Yu, Jianhua & Xie, Jianhui & Yang, Qingchun, 2022. "A highly efficient and environmentally friendly approach for in-situ utilization of CO2 from coal to ethylene glycol plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Ding, Rui & Li, Yaopeng & Li, Haoran & Duan, Huiquan & Jia, Ming & García, Antonio & Monsalve-Serrano, Javier, 2025. "Experimental optimization toward high efficiency and low emissions in an ammonia-fueled RCCI engine with various reactivity enhancements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    13. Subrato Acharjya & Jiacheng Chen & Minghui Zhu & Chong Peng, 2021. "Elucidating the reactivity and nature of active sites for tin phthalocyanine during CO2 reduction," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(6), pages 1191-1197, December.
    14. Yangbo Ma & Liang Guo & Liang Chang & Weihua Guo & Tao Zhou & Fengkun Hao & Wenda Su & Jingwen Zhou & Guozhi Wang & Mingzheng Shao & Jihan Yu & Jinwen Yin & Yunhao Wang & Fu Liu & An Zhang & Kun Qian , 2025. "Unconventional phase metal heteronanostructures with tunable exposed interface for efficient tandem nitrate electroreduction to ammonia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Xinyang Gao & Yongjun Jiang & Jiyuan Liu & Guoshuai Shi & Chunlei Yang & Qinshang Xu & Yuanqing Yun & Yuluo Shen & Mingwei Chang & Chenyuan Zhu & Tingyu Lu & Yin Wang & Guanchen Du & Shuzhou Li & Shen, 2024. "Intermediate-regulated dynamic restructuring at Ag-Cu biphasic interface enables selective CO2 electroreduction to C2+ fuels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Bharath, G. & Karthikeyan, G. & Kumar, Anuj & Prakash, J. & Venkatasubbu, Devanand & Kumar Nadda, Ashok & Kumar Gupta, Vijai & Abu Haija, Mohammad & Banat, Fawzi, 2022. "Surface engineering of Au nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced electrochemical reduction of N2 and CO2 into urea in the visible-NIR region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    17. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    18. Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian & Petrescu, Letitia & Chisalita, Dora Andreea & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of methanol production and conversion into various chemical intermediates and products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    19. Cameron Hepburn & Brian O’Callaghan & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2020. "Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 359-381.
    20. Xu, T.X. & Tian, X.K. & Khosa, A.A. & Yan, J. & Ye, Q. & Zhao, C.Y., 2021. "Reaction performance of CaCO3/CaO thermochemical energy storage with TiO2 dopant and experimental study in a fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6221-:d:1439452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.