IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p3932-d1390440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the EU Climate and Energy Policy Priorities for Transport and Mobility through the Analysis of User-Generated Social Media Content Based on Text-Mining Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Nikolaidou

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory Aristotle, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Aristomenis Kopsacheilis

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory Aristotle, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Gavanas

    (Department of Planning and Regional Development, School of Engineering, University of Thessaly, 38334 Volos, Greece)

  • Ioannis Politis

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory Aristotle, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

For over three decades, the European Union’s (EU) transport policy has aimed at fostering environmental sustainability and energy efficiency. Since 2015, European policymakers have focused more on three key sustainable development goals: decarbonizing the transport system, promoting low-emission mobility solutions, and transitioning to renewable and alternative fuels. To effectively communicate priorities and engage stakeholders, EU policymakers regularly use social media platforms like Twitter (now known as X). This active discourse involves policymakers, industrial stakeholders, the media, and the public, offering insights into the role of transport policy in addressing climate change and energy transition challenges. The current research endeavors to track and analyze the evolution of user-generated content related to climate change, energy transition, and smart mobility on Twitter from 2011 to 2021. This research uses text-mining and social network analysis techniques to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the dynamics of relevant EU policies and their effects. The study’s findings can be used to establish a robust monitoring and evaluation framework at the EU and national levels. This framework will assess the effectiveness of communicating strategic priorities for sustainable transport development. It also holds potential for application in other sectors, broadening its impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia Nikolaidou & Aristomenis Kopsacheilis & Nikolaos Gavanas & Ioannis Politis, 2024. "Assessing the EU Climate and Energy Policy Priorities for Transport and Mobility through the Analysis of User-Generated Social Media Content Based on Text-Mining Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:3932-:d:1390440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/3932/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/3932/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barberio , Vitaliano & Kuric, Ines & Mollona , Edoardo & Pareschi, Luca, 2020. "The use of social media in EU policy communication and implications for the emergence of a European public sphere," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 46, pages 111-129.
    2. Lei Tang & Zongtao Duan & Yaling Zhao, 2019. "Toward using social media to support ridesharing services: challenges and opportunities," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 355-379, May.
    3. Colin Ferster & Karen Laberee & Trisalyn Nelson & Calvin Thigpen & Michael Simeone & Meghan Winters, 2021. "From advocacy to acceptance: Social media discussions of protected bike lane installations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 941-958, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Pengyu & Lee, Chung-Yee & Chu, Chengbin & Chen, Cynthia & Luo, Zhiqin, 2021. "Matching and pricing in ride-sharing: Optimality, stability, and financial sustainability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Shirgaokar, Manish & Reynard, Darcy & Collins, Damian, 2021. "Using twitter to investigate responses to street reallocation during COVID-19: Findings from the U.S. and Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 300-312.
    3. Muhamad Rizki & Tri Basuki Joewono & Dimas Bayu Endrayana Dharmowijoyo & Dwi Prasetyanto, 2021. "The Effects of On- and Before- Journey Advantages Using Ride-Sourcing in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:3932-:d:1390440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.