IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7311-d1134836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing “Forest” into Daily Lives for Sustainability: A Case Study of Taiwanese Wooden Furniture Design

Author

Listed:
  • Yikang Sun

    (College of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Ching-Chiuan Yen

    (Division of Industrial Design, Keio-NUS CUTE Center, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117356, Singapore)

  • Tien-Li Chen

    (Department of Industrial Design, College of Design, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

Abstract

Taiwan’s forest resources are abundant, diverse, and of high quality. However, Taiwan’s self-sufficiency rate for timber is only 1.2%. How to build Taiwan’s local wooden furniture brand to improve quality of life and achieve sustainable development is worth considering. This study adopted a qualitative research method using Taiwan’s local carbon-negative furniture brand “ Forest in Living ” as a case study. We used communication theory to construct a conceptual model that was then used to analyze the design and promotion of furniture. Carbon-negative furniture makes people feel like they are living and breathing deep in the forest, which is one of the best ways to reduce one’s carbon footprint. The Forest in Living furniture is full of Taiwanese characteristics and firmly captures the country’s foundation and soul. The designers have great respect for wood and strong control over the characteristics of the material, and the furniture has unique characteristics and rich content. In the future, we will further study the findings of this paper by inviting consumers to express their views on the design concepts and finished products of this type of furniture, which will be used to examine whether the design concepts can be recognized by consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yikang Sun & Ching-Chiuan Yen & Tien-Li Chen, 2023. "Designing “Forest” into Daily Lives for Sustainability: A Case Study of Taiwanese Wooden Furniture Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7311-:d:1134836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tien-Li Chen & Chin-Chuan Chen & Yen-Ching Chuang & James J. H. Liou, 2020. "A Hybrid MADM Model for Product Design Evaluation and Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Green Furniture Brands in the Marketing 4.0 Period: An Integrated MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, August.
    3. Shih-Hsing Wu & Kuo-Kuang Fan & Chuan-Jen Sun, 2021. "A Study on the Application of Code Theory in the Decorative Design of Taiwan Bamboo Tube Furniture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Epede, Mesumbe Bianca & Wang, Daoping, 2022. "Competitiveness and upgrading in global value chains: A multiple-country analysis of the wooden furniture industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    5. Mohd Effendi Muhammad Suandi & Mohammad Harith Amlus & Abdul Rahman Hemdi & Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim & Mohd Fathullah Ghazali & Nur Liza Rahim, 2022. "A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-56, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongfang Yang & Carlo Vezzoli, 2024. "Designing Environmentally Sustainable Furniture Products: Furniture-Specific Life Cycle Design Guidelines and a Toolkit to Promote Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Binghong Pan & Shasha Luo & Jinfeng Ying & Yang Shao & Shangru Liu & Xiang Li & Jiaqi Lei, 2021. "Evaluation and Analysis of CFI Schemes with Different Length of Displaced Left-Turn Lanes with Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Ling Zhu & Yuqi Yan & Jiufang Lv, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Knowledge Structure and Research Progress Related to Sustainable Furniture Design Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Luboš Červený & Roman Sloup & Tereza Červená & Marcel Riedl & Petra Palátová, 2022. "Industry 4.0 as an Opportunity and Challenge for the Furniture Industry—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Meng-Chen Zhang & Bo-Wei Zhu & Chao-Meng Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2021. "Systematic Evaluation Model for Developing Sustainable World-Class Universities: An East Asian Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Wenxin Deng & Hong Lin & Mu Jiang, 2023. "Research on Bamboo Furniture Design Based on D4S (Design for Sustainability)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Margherita Bernabei & Marco Eugeni & Paolo Gaudenzi & Francesco Costantino, 2023. "Assessment of Smart Transformation in the Manufacturing Process of Aerospace Components Through a Data-Driven Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 67-86, March.
    8. Elisabete Nogueira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2023. "Triple Bottom Line, Sustainability, and Economic Development: What Binds Them Together? A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7311-:d:1134836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.