IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2414-d1050489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Pedestrian Satisfaction in Old and New Town: An Impact-Asymmetry Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Han

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Dewei Fang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Shan Sun

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Lixuan Zhao

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Qian Zheng

    (CAUPD Beijing Planning and Design Consultants Co., Ltd., Hainan Branch, Haikou 570100, China)

  • Jingxu Lan

    (Northwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. Institutional, Xian 710075, China)

  • Xue Wang

    (Heilongjiang Province Urban Planning Survey and Design Institute, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

In the context of the global construction of low-carbon cities and residents’ pursuit of healthy living, the improvement in the urban walking environment has gradually been emphasized in the field of planning and transportation research. Using Harbin, China, as an example, this paper combines gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs) and impact-asymmetry analysis (IAA) methods to explore the differences in residents’ preferences for the pedestrian environment needs in old and new urban areas, analyze the asymmetric relationship between walking environment factors and overall satisfaction, and provide a sound basis for the renewal and reconstruction of the walking environment in old urban areas and the improvement of the walking environment in new urban areas. The factors affecting the pedestrian environment in the old and new urban areas are similar and different, with the aesthetics and safety and the aesthetics and comfort of the pedestrian environment having a greater impact on the old and new urban areas, respectively. According to the results of the IAA, the old city should focus on improving green landscaping, street furniture, the uncivilized behavior of pedestrians, pavement encroachment, barrier-free facilities, and the speed of motor vehicles; the new city should focus on improving the building facade effect, the uncivilized behavior of pedestrians, and green landscaping.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Han & Dewei Fang & Shan Sun & Lixuan Zhao & Qian Zheng & Jingxu Lan & Xue Wang, 2023. "Exploring Pedestrian Satisfaction in Old and New Town: An Impact-Asymmetry Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2414-:d:1050489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Wang, Yunpeng, 2018. "Synergistic effects of the built environment and commuting programs on commute mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 104-118.
    2. Chen, Pin-Zheng & Liu, Wan-Yu, 2019. "Assessing management performance of the national forest park using impact range-performance analysis and impact-asymmetry analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-138.
    3. Tom Rye & Robert Hrelja, 2020. "Policies for Reducing Car Traffic and Their Problematisation. Lessons from the Mobility Strategies of British, Dutch, German and Swedish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Shaohua Tan & Fengxiao Cao & Jinsu Yang, 2020. "The Study on Spatial Elements of Health-Supportive Environment in Residential Streets Promoting Residents’ Walking Trips," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-33, July.
    5. Byoung-Suk Kweon & Jody Rosenblatt-Naderi & Christopher D. Ellis & Woo-Hwa Shin & Blair H. Danies, 2021. "The Effects of Pedestrian Environments on Walking Behaviors and Perception of Pedestrian Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Jingxu Lan & Yang Xue & Dewei Fang & Qian Zheng, 2022. "Optimal Strategies for Elderly Public Transport Service Based on Impact-Asymmetry Analysis: A Case Study of Harbin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuo Chen & Dewei Fang, 2024. "Exploring Public Space Satisfaction in Old Residential Areas Based on Impact-Asymmetry Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi & Nilda Georgina Liotta, 2023. "Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Mingwei He & Jianbo Li & Zhuangbin Shi & Yang Liu & Chunyan Shuai & Jie Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Nonlinear and Threshold Effects of Travel Distance on the Travel Mode Choice across Different Groups: An Empirical Study of Guiyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Ye Sun & Wei Lu & Peijin Sun, 2021. "Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Liu, Wan-Yu & Tsao, Chen & Lin, Chun-Cheng, 2023. "Tourists' preference for colors of forest landscapes and its implications for forest landscape planning policies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. José Alberto Molina & J. Ignacio Giménez-Nadal & Jorge Velilla, 2020. "Sustainable Commuting: Results from a Social Approach and International Evidence on Carpooling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Qi Chen & Yibo Yan & Xu Zhang & Jian Chen, 2022. "Impact of Subjective and Objective Factors on Subway Travel Behavior: Spatial Differentiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Siya Cheng & Zheran Zhai & Wenzhuo Sun & Yuan Wang & Rui Yu & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Research on the Satisfaction of Beijing Waterfront Green Space Landscape Based on Social Media Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Eldeeb, Gamal & Mohamed, Moataz & Páez, Antonio, 2021. "Built for active travel? Investigating the contextual effects of the built environment on transportation mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Yu, Bin & Ju, Yang, 2021. "Non-linear associations between zonal built environment attributes and transit commuting mode choice accounting for spatial heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-35.
    10. Du, Qiang & Zhou, Yuqing & Huang, Youdan & Wang, Yalei & Bai, Libiao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal exploration of the non-linear impacts of accessibility on metro ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Xu, Yiming & Yan, Xiang & Liu, Xinyu & Zhao, Xilei, 2021. "Identifying key factors associated with ridesplitting adoption rate and modeling their nonlinear relationships," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 170-188.
    12. Tingting Ding & Wenzhuo Sun & Yuan Wang & Rui Yu & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Comparative Evaluation of Mountain Landscapes in Beijing Based on Social Media Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-30, October.
    13. Pengwei Wang & Lirong Han & Rong Mei, 2022. "An Impact Asymmetry Analysis of Small Urban Green Space Attributes to Enhance Visitor Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Peng Zang & Hualong Qiu & Fei Xian & Linchuan Yang & Yanan Qiu & Hongxu Guo, 2022. "Nonlinear Effects of the Built Environment on Light Physical Activity among Older Adults: The Case of Lanzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Tao, Tao & Cao, Jason, 2023. "Exploring nonlinear and collective influences of regional and local built environment characteristics on travel distances by mode," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Liang Guo & Shuo Yang & Qinghao Zhang & Leyu Zhou & Hui He, 2023. "Examining the Nonlinear and Synergistic Effects of Multidimensional Elements on Commuting Carbon Emissions: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Samira Ramezani & Tiina Laatikainen & Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Marketta Kyttä, 2021. "Shopping trip mode choice of older adults: an application of activity space and hybrid choice models in understanding the effects of built environment and personal goals," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 505-536, April.
    18. Tong, Zhaomin & An, Rui & Zhang, Ziyi & Liu, Yaolin & Luo, Minghai, 2022. "Exploring non-linear and spatially non-stationary relationships between commuting burden and built environment correlates," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Liu, Jixiang & Xiao, Longzhu, 2023. "Non-linear relationships between built environment and commuting duration of migrants and locals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    20. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2414-:d:1050489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.