IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2411-d1050420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative Efficiency Evaluation System for Intelligent Transportation Facilities Based on the Variable Weight Matter Element Extension

Author

Listed:
  • Kailei Li

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250300, China)

  • Han Bai

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250300, China
    Shandong Key Laboratory of Smart Transportation (Preparation), Jinan 250101, China)

  • Xiang Yan

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250300, China)

  • Liang Zhao

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250300, China
    Shandong Key Laboratory of Smart Transportation (Preparation), Jinan 250101, China)

  • Xiuguang Wang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250300, China
    Shandong Key Laboratory of Smart Transportation (Preparation), Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

In order to effectively evaluate the cooperative efficiency of intelligent transportation facilities, a structural model of four cooperative development elements, including functional cooperative, operational cooperative, information cooperative, and operation cooperative, is constructed with the guidance of system coordination and a cooperative efficiency evaluation system is established based on it. Then, a dynamic efficiency evaluation model based on variable weight and matter-element extension method was constructed to describe the cooperative efficiency of intelligent transportation facilities and analyze the cooperative efficiency of key road sections in the Jinan area as an example. The results show that of the ten sections, two are in poor performance status, three are in good performance status, and five are in excellent performance status. The four indexes of vertical cooperative construction, functional scheduling level, information element completeness, and multi-departmental information integration level have the most significant impact on facility cooperative efficiency and are the most sensitive; the three indexes of plan executability, functional ease of upgrading, and space–time alignment rate have the most negligible impact on facility cooperative efficiency and are the least sensitive.

Suggested Citation

  • Kailei Li & Han Bai & Xiang Yan & Liang Zhao & Xiuguang Wang, 2023. "Cooperative Efficiency Evaluation System for Intelligent Transportation Facilities Based on the Variable Weight Matter Element Extension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2411-:d:1050420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianhong Chen & Yi Chen & Shan Yang & Xudong Zhong & Xu Han, 2019. "A prediction model on rockburst intensity grade based on variable weight and matter-element extension," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Deliang Sun & Jianping Wu & Fengtai Zhang & Weici Su & Hong Hui, 2018. "Evaluating Water Resource Security in Karst Areas Using DPSIRM Modeling, Gray Correlation, and Matter–Element Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Felbermayr, Gabriel J. & Tarasov, Alexander, 2022. "Trade and the spatial distribution of transport infrastructure," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Juan Huang & Yuhong Shuai & Qi Liu & Hang Zhou & Zhenggang He, 2018. "Synergy Degree Evaluation Based on Synergetics for Sustainable Logistics Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Zhongwei Gao & Donghui Ma & Wei Wang & Xiaodong Guo & Qingzi Ge, 2018. "Development and Application of Ancient Timber Buildings Structural Condition Assessment Model Based on a Fuzzy Matter-Element Model that Includes Asymmetric Proximity," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo D. Fajgelbaum & Edouard Schaal, 2020. "Optimal Transport Networks in Spatial Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1411-1452, July.
    2. Akihiko Yanase & Ngo Van Long & Ngo Van Long, 2020. "Trade Costs and Strategic Investment in Infrastructure in a Dynamic Global Economy with Symmetric Countries," CESifo Working Paper Series 8707, CESifo.
    3. Zheng, Han & Hongtao, Li, 2022. "Transportation Infrastructure and Trade," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-124, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. Maximilian v. Ehrlich & Henry G. Overman, 2020. "Place-Based Policies and Spatial Disparities across European Cities," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 128-149, Summer.
    5. Rui Ren & Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bo Sun & Yicun Chen & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Systematic Literature Review of Green and Sustainable Logistics: Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trend and Knowledge Taxonomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Rémi Jedwab & Adam Storeygard, 2022. "The Average and Heterogeneous Effects of Transportation Investments: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa 1960–2010," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-38.
    7. Roberto Bonfatti & Yuan Gu & Steven Poelhekke, 2019. "Priority Roads: The Political Economy of Africa's Interior-to-Coast Roads," CESifo Working Paper Series 7478, CESifo.
    8. Jaimovich, Esteban, 2019. "Roadways, input sourcing, and patterns of specialization," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Santamaria, Marta, 2020. "Reshaping Infrastructure: Evidence from the division of Germany," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1244, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    10. Lorz, Oliver, 2020. "Investment in trade facilitating infrastructure: A political-economy analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Hannes Thees, 2020. "Towards Local Sustainability of Mega Infrastructure: Reviewing Research on the New Silk Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-35, December.
    12. Felbermayr, Gabriel J. & Tarasov, Alexander, 2022. "Trade and the spatial distribution of transport infrastructure," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Gabriel Loumeau, 2020. "Regional Borders, Commuting and Transport Network Integration," KOF Working papers 20-489, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    14. Arghya Ghosh & Kieron Meagher, 2011. "The Political Economy of Infrastructure Investment: Competition, Collusion and Uncertainty," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2011-556, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    15. Bing Qing Tan & Fangfang Wang & Jia Liu & Kai Kang & Federica Costa, 2020. "A Blockchain-Based Framework for Green Logistics in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Meurers, Martin & Moenius, Johannes, 2018. "Optimal Public Investment in Economic Centers and the Periphery," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181579, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Mengtian Lu & Siyu Wang & Xiaoying Wang & Weihong Liao & Chao Wang & Xiaohui Lei & Hao Wang, 2022. "An Assessment of Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Regional Water Resources Security in the DPSIR Framework in Jiangxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Zhe Liu & Jianhong Chen & Yakun Zhao & Shan Yang, 2023. "A Novel Method for Predicting Rockburst Intensity Based on an Improved Unascertained Measurement and an Improved Game Theory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Meseret Chanieabate & Hai He & Chuyue Guo & Betelhem Abrahamgeremew & Yuanji Huang, 2023. "Examining the Relationship between Transportation Infrastructure, Urbanization Level and Rural-Urban Income Gap in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Santamaria, Marta, 2020. "Reshaping Infrastructure : Evidence from the division of Germany," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 456, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2411-:d:1050420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.