IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1015-d1026434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Saudi Arabia’s Classification and Selection Criteria for Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Barzan Heritage Area in Hail City

Author

Listed:
  • Ghazy Abdullah Albaqawy

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hail, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Mashary Alnaim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hail, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Abdulfattah Bay

    (Department of Heritage Resources Management & Tour Guidance, College of Tourism & Archaeology, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mabrouk Touahmia

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hail, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Cultural heritage has numerous developmental prospects that might contribute to the sustainable development and quality of life of communities. However, cultural heritage products have a complex relationship with many sectors. This paper examines Saudi criteria for the classification and selection of cultural heritage and presents a case study on the implementation of these criteria. It aims to develop local assessment criteria for cultural heritage values and conservation in Saudi Arabia. A theoretical analysis has been conducted to evaluate the criteria for the classification and selection of architectural heritage value and the relationship between whole heritage values. The paper discusses the criteria’s limitations and impacts and identifies misunderstandings of cultural heritage values in Saudi Arabia. The findings of this study indicate that the mechanism of implementing a list can affect both tangible and intangible cultural heritage in different ways and at different levels. The criteria should include all cultural heritage values within a context rather than a single building or object. Thus, one of the main objectives of the criteria is to recognize and highlight the importance of a site through its values. The case study of the Barzan District illustrates the factual impact of current legislation and organizational structures on heritage sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghazy Abdullah Albaqawy & Mohammed Mashary Alnaim & Mohammed Abdulfattah Bay & Mabrouk Touahmia, 2023. "Assessment of Saudi Arabia’s Classification and Selection Criteria for Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Barzan Heritage Area in Hail City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1015-:d:1026434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnese Amato & Maria Andreoli & Massimo Rovai, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse of a Historic Building by Introducing New Functions: A Scenario Evaluation Based on Participatory MCA Applied to a Former Carthusian Monastery in Tuscany, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Paloma Guzman & Ana R. Pereira Roders & Bernard Colenbrander, 2018. "Impacts of Common Urban Development Factors on Cultural Conservation in World Heritage Cities: An Indicators-Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Ken Taylor, 2016. "The Historic Urban Landscape paradigm and cities as cultural landscapes. Challenging orthodoxy in urban conservation," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 471-480, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxi Liu & Yu Bai & Wushuang Li & Qibing Chen & Xinyu Du, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Distribution of Cultural Heritage in Relation to Population and Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from the Ming-Qing Yangtze River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Silvia Mazzetto & Fiorella Vanini, 2023. "Urban Heritage in Saudi Arabia: Comparison and Assessment of Sustainable Reuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suling Guo & Wei Sun & Wen Chen & Jianxin Zhang & Peixue Liu, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Elements on Mountain Landscape Perception: An Eye-Tracking Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Rosa Rodrigues & João Caldeira Heitor & Helena Pimentel & Tiago Lopes, 2025. "Relationship Between Preservation of Built Cultural Heritage and Economic Development in Lisbon and Porto: Cultural Legacy and Urban Revitalization as Serial Mediation Mechanisms," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Min Yin & Jiangang Xu & Zhongyuan Yang, 2019. "Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Sitong Wu & Hanyu Wei & Guoguang Wang, 2025. "Analysis of the Layering Characteristics and Value Space Coupling Coordination of the Historic Landscape of Chaozhou Ancient City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Di Zuo & Changrong Li & Mingliang Lin & Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2022. "Tourism, Residents Agent Practice and Traditional Residential Landscapes at a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case Study of Hongcun Village, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Cristian Moise & Iulia Dana Negula & Cristina Elena Mihalache & Andi Mihai Lazar & Andreea Luminita Dedulescu & Gabriel Tiberiu Rustoiu & Ioan Constantin Inel & Alexandru Badea, 2021. "Remote Sensing for Cultural Heritage Assessment and Monitoring: The Case Study of Alba Iulia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Xian Ji & Long Shao & Yu Du, 2020. "Collaborating with Local Communities to Identify Improvement Priorities for Historic Urban Landscape Based on Residents’ Satisfaction: An Application of Asymmetric Impact-Performance Analysis in Dando," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Musiaka, Łukasz & Sudra, Paweł & Spórna, Tomasz, 2025. "Still suffering, still on the periphery? Different paths of the town's post-war spatial change. Evidence from north-eastern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Li Li & Yongjian Wu & Jin Zhang, 2025. "Bridging Heritage Conservation and Urban Sustainability: A Multidimensional Coupling Framework for Walkability, Greening, and Cultural Heritage in the Historic City of Shenyang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Xiang Ren & Sangeeta Singh & Abhishek Bhutoria & Huriye Armağan Doğan, 2025. "Placemaking Through Time in Nepal: Conceptualising the Historic Urban-Rural Landscape of Kathmandu," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    11. Hakimian Shiva & Afshar Ali & Kowalczyk-Anioł Joanna, 2019. "Returning Life to the Center of Tehran: The Oudlajan Foodscape," Turyzm / Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 31-41, December.
    12. He, Qingsong & Larkham, Peter & Wu, Jiayu, 2021. "Evaluating historic preservation zoning using a landscape approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Wei Gao & Gengyu Chen & Fanying Jiang & Jiake Shen & Yuncai Wang, 2021. "To Act or Not to Act: Are Natural Landscapes a Key Force in the Resilience of Historic Urban Landscapes?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-33, September.
    14. Jiangang Shi & Xinru Min & Hongyun Si & Daizhong Tang & Wei Miao, 2019. "The Transition from Housing Demolition to Conservation and Renovation in Shanghai: Challenges and Countermeasures," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Ky Nam Nguyen & Sarah Baker, 2023. "Climate Change Impacts on UNESCO World Heritage-Listed Cultural Properties in the Asia–Pacific Region: A Systematic Review of State of Conservation Reports, 1979–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessia Marello, 2020. "An Application of the A’WOT Analysis for the Management of Cultural Heritage Assets: The Case of the Historical Farmhouses in the Aglié Castle (Turin)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Despina Dimelli & Areti Kotsoni, 2023. "The Reconstruction of Post-War Cities—Proposing Integrated Conservation Plans for Aleppo’s Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Mehrdad Chahardowli & Hassan Sajadzadeh & Farshid Aram & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Survey of Sustainable Regeneration of Historic and Cultural Cores of Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Xiaoxu Liang & Yanjun Lu & John Martin, 2021. "A Review of the Role of Social Media for the Cultural Heritage Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Yuxian Chen & Jiajia Tang & Daixin Dai, 2024. "Using Public Participation Geographic Information System to Study Social Cohesion and Its Relationship with Activities and Specific Landscape Characteristics in Shanghai’s Modern Historic Parks," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1015-:d:1026434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.