IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14076-d1245836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Attitude or Intention Affect Behavior in Sustainable Tourism? A Review and Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Tai Ming Wut

    (College of Professional and Continuing Education, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Daisy Lee

    (College of Professional and Continuing Education, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Stephanie Wing Lee

    (College of Professional and Continuing Education, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

This study presents a critical literature review on the tourist attitude–behavior gap and intention–behavior gap in sustainable tourism research and proposes future research directions. A systematic review was conducted using preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) on the existing literature from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Key research topics in attitude–behavior gaps are the role of environmental knowledge, protected area management, the role of service quality, risk perception, moral licensing, sustainability communication, business owners in tourism, environmental concern, tourist psychology, and intervention. Key research topics in the intention–behavior gaps of sustainable tourism are green certification or label, value, rationality and social desirability, motivation, trust, inconvenience, and quality. Four emerging research trends were discovered in recent years: (1) increased use of mixed methods and surveys; (2) consideration of green or environmental knowledge; (3) role of green certification; and (4) consideration of tourist moral values. Recommended future research directions include theoretical development studies in the hospitality sector, cross-cultural comparisons, investigation, of under-researched tourism sectors, and new research methodologies. This review provides an overview of research on the attitude–behavior gap and the intention–behavior gap in sustainable tourism. Our study proposes a new framework for the attitude–behavior gap and the intention–behavior gap, departing from the theory of planned behavior. We identify direct and indirect factors that influence sustainable tourist behavior, with sustainable tourist attitude and intention serving as mediators. Overall, our findings offer valuable insights into the complex relationship between attitudes, intentions, and behaviors in sustainable tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Tai Ming Wut & Daisy Lee & Stephanie Wing Lee, 2023. "Does Attitude or Intention Affect Behavior in Sustainable Tourism? A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14076-:d:1245836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatjana Mamula Nikolić & Sanja Popović Pantić & Ivan Paunović & Sanja Filipović, 2021. "Sustainable Travel Decision-Making of Europeans: Insights from a Household Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Monteiro & Celeste Eusébio & Maria João Carneiro & Mara Madaleno & Margarita Robaina & Vitor Rodrigues & Carla Gama & Hélder Relvas & Michael Russo & Kevin Oliveira & Myriam Lopes & Carlos B, 2021. "Tourism and Air Quality during COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Tatjana Mamula Nikolić & Ivan Paunović & Mirjana Milovanović & Nenad Lozović & Marija Đurović, 2022. "Examining Generation Z’s Attitudes, Behavior and Awareness Regarding Eco-Products: A Bayesian Approach to Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Bahram Zikirya & Jieyu Wang & Chunshan Zhou, 2021. "The Relationship between CO 2 Emissions, Air Pollution, and Tourism Flows in China: A Panel Data Analysis of Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Jarkko Saarinen, 2021. "Is Being Responsible Sustainable in Tourism? Connections and Critical Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Ghada Alturif & Wafaa Saleh, 2023. "Travel Demand Management in an Auto Dominated City: Can Travel Behaviour Be Nudged in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Bäuerle, Max Juri, 2022. "Striving for low-carbon lifestyles: An analysis of the mobility patterns of different urban household types with regard to emissions reductions in a real-world lab experiment in Berlin," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2022-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Carlos Mestanza-Ramón & José Luis Jiménez-Caballero, 2021. "Nature Tourism on the Colombian—Ecuadorian Amazonian Border: History, Current Situation, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Civilai Leckie & Daniel Rayne & Lester W. Johnson, 2021. "Promoting Customer Engagement Behavior for Green Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Marek Bauer & Kinga Bauer, 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Future of Public Transport: Example of Warsaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Armindo Frias & Erza Raskova & Álvaro Costa & João Cabral, 2021. "Obtaining Data Values from Tourist Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14076-:d:1245836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.