IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13282-d1232942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Preprocessing and Machine Learning Modeling for Rockburst Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Li

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Helin Fu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Kaixun Hu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Wei Chen

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

Rockbursts pose a significant threat to human safety and environmental stability. This paper aims to predict rockburst intensity using a machine learning model. A dataset containing 344 rockburst cases was collected, with eight inducing features as input and four rockburst grades as output. In the preprocessing stage, missing feature values were estimated using a regression imputation strategy. A novel approach, which combines feature selection (FS), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) clustering, was proposed to relabel the dataset. The effectiveness of this approach was compared with common statistical methods, and its underlying principles were analyzed. A voting ensemble strategy was used to build the machine learning model, and optimal hyperparameters were determined using the tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE), whose efficiency and accuracy were compared with three common optimization algorithms. The best combination model was determined using performance evaluation and subsequently applied to practical rockburst prediction. Finally, feature sensitivity was studied using a relative importance analysis. The results indicate that the FS + t-SNE + GMM approach stands out as the optimum data preprocessing method, significantly improving the prediction accuracy and generalization ability of the model. TPE is the most effective optimization algorithm, characterized simultaneously by both high search capability and efficiency. Moreover, the elastic energy index W et , the maximum circumferential stress of surrounding rock σ θ , and the uniaxial compression strength of rock σ c were identified as relatively important features in the rockburst prediction model.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Li & Helin Fu & Kaixun Hu & Wei Chen, 2023. "Data Preprocessing and Machine Learning Modeling for Rockburst Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13282-:d:1232942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Buuren, Stef & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin, 2011. "mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 45(i03).
    2. Zhenkai Ma & Sheng Li & Xidong Zhao, 2023. "Energy Accumulation Characteristics and Induced Rockburst Mechanism of Roadway Surrounding Rock under Multiple Mining Disturbances: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Weizhang Liang & Asli Sari & Guoyan Zhao & Stephen D. McKinnon & Hao Wu, 2020. "Short-term rockburst risk prediction using ensemble learning methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1923-1946, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhilash Bandam & Eedris Busari & Chloi Syranidou & Jochen Linssen & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Classification of Building Types in Germany: A Data-Driven Modeling Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Boonstra Philip S. & Little Roderick J.A. & West Brady T. & Andridge Rebecca R. & Alvarado-Leiton Fernanda, 2021. "A Simulation Study of Diagnostics for Selection Bias," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 751-769, September.
    3. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Norah Alyabs & Sy Han Chiou, 2022. "The Missing Indicator Approach for Accelerated Failure Time Model with Covariates Subject to Limits of Detection," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    6. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    8. J M van Niekerk & M C Vos & A Stein & L M A Braakman-Jansen & A F Voor in ‘t holt & J E W C van Gemert-Pijnen, 2020. "Risk factors for surgical site infections using a data-driven approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Joost R. Ginkel, 2020. "Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for $${R}^{{2}}$$R2 in Multiply Imputed Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 185-205, March.
    10. Gerko Vink & Laurence E. Frank & Jeroen Pannekoek & Stef Buuren, 2014. "Predictive mean matching imputation of semicontinuous variables," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(1), pages 61-90, February.
    11. Tsai, Tsung-Han, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Dynamic Panel Models with Endogenous Rarely Changing Variables," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 595-620, September.
    12. Hung Tong & Cristina Tortora, 2022. "Model-based clustering and outlier detection with missing data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(1), pages 5-30, March.
    13. Manuel S. González Canché, 2017. "Financial Benefits of Rapid Student Loan Repayment: An Analytic Framework Employing Two Decades of Data," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 671(1), pages 154-182, May.
    14. Annisa Rahmalia & Michael Holton Price & Yovita Hartantri & Bachti Alisjahbana & Rudi Wisaksana & Reinout van Crevel & Andre J A M van der Ven, 2019. "Are there differences in HIV retention in care between female and male patients in Indonesia? A multi-state analysis of a retrospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Lara Lopez & Fernando L. Vázquez & Ángela J. Torres & Patricia Otero & Vanessa Blanco & Olga Díaz & Mario Páramo, 2020. "Long-Term Effects of a Cognitive Behavioral Conference Call Intervention on Depression in Non-Professional Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Sabine Zinn & Michael Bayer, 2021. "Time Spent on School-Related Activities at Home during the Pandemic: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social Group Inequality among Secondary School Students," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1132, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    17. Ronald Herrera & Ursula Berger & Ondine S. Von Ehrenstein & Iván Díaz & Stella Huber & Daniel Moraga Muñoz & Katja Radon, 2017. "Estimating the Causal Impact of Proximity to Gold and Copper Mines on Respiratory Diseases in Chilean Children: An Application of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Graffelman, Jan, 2015. "Exploring Diallelic Genetic Markers: The HardyWeinberg Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 64(i03).
    19. Maaz Gardezi & J. Gordon Arbuckle, 2019. "Spatially Representing Vulnerability to Extreme Rain Events Using Midwestern Farmers’ Objective and Perceived Attributes of Adaptive Capacity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 17-34, January.
    20. Nguyen, Son & Fu, Xiuju & Ogawa, Daichi & Zheng, Qin, 2023. "An application-oriented testing regime and multi-ship predictive modeling for vessel fuel consumption prediction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13282-:d:1232942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.