IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12333-d1216507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Water Carbon Fluxes and Emission Causes in Rice Paddies Using Two Tree-Based Ensemble Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Xinqin Gu

    (School of Hydraulic and Ecological Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China
    Jiangxi Provincial Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Water Engineering in Poyang Lake Basin, Shangrao 334100, China)

  • Li Yao

    (School of Hydraulic and Ecological Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China
    Jiangxi Provincial Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Water Engineering in Poyang Lake Basin, Shangrao 334100, China)

  • Lifeng Wu

    (School of Hydraulic and Ecological Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China
    Jiangxi Provincial Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Water Engineering in Poyang Lake Basin, Shangrao 334100, China
    State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

Abstract

Quantification of water carbon fluxes in rice paddies and analysis of their causes are essential for agricultural water management and carbon budgets. In this regard, two tree-based machine learning models, which are extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest (RF), were constructed to predict evapotranspiration (ET), net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE), and methane flux (FCH 4 ) in seven rice paddy sites. During the training process, the k-fold cross-validation algorithm by splitting the available data into multiple subsets or folds to avoid overfitting, and the XGBoost model was used to assess the importance of input factors. When predicting ET, the XGBoost model outperformed the RF model at all sites. Solar radiation was the most important input to ET predictions. Except for the KR-CRK site, the prediction for NEE was that the XGBoost models also performed better in the other six sites, and the root mean square error decreased by 0.90–11.21% compared to the RF models. Among all sites (except for the absence of net radiation (NETRAD) data at the JP-Mse site), NETRAD and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) performed well for predicting NEE. Air temperature, soil water content (SWC), and longwave radiation were particularly important at individual sites. Similarly, the XGBoost model was more capable of predicting FCH 4 than the RF model, except for the IT-Cas site. FCH 4 sensitivity to input factors varied from site to site. SWC, ecosystem respiration, NDVI, and soil temperature were important for FCH 4 prediction. It is proposed to use the XGBoost model to model water carbon fluxes in rice paddies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinqin Gu & Li Yao & Lifeng Wu, 2023. "Prediction of Water Carbon Fluxes and Emission Causes in Rice Paddies Using Two Tree-Based Ensemble Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12333-:d:1216507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yash Agrawal & Manoranjan Kumar & Supriya Ananthakrishnan & Gopalakrishnan Kumarapuram, 2022. "Evapotranspiration Modeling Using Different Tree Based Ensembled Machine Learning Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(3), pages 1025-1042, February.
    2. Filgueiras, Roberto & Almeida, Thomé Simpliciano & Mantovani, Everardo Chartuni & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Fernandes-Filho, Elpídio Inácio & da Cunha, Fernando França & Venancio, Luan Peroni, 2020. "Soil water content and actual evapotranspiration predictions using regression algorithms and remote sensing data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Helge Bormann, 2011. "Sensitivity analysis of 18 different potential evapotranspiration models to observed climatic change at German climate stations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 729-753, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muniandy, Josilva M. & Yusop, Zulkifli & Askari, Muhamad, 2016. "Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration models and determination of crop coefficient for Momordica charantia and Capsicum annuum," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 77-89.
    2. Yan, Haofang & Li, Mi & Zhang, Chuan & Zhang, Jianyun & Wang, Guoqing & Yu, Jianjun & Ma, Jiamin & Zhao, Shuang, 2022. "Comparison of evapotranspiration upscaling methods from instantaneous to daytime scale for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Mohammad Valipour, 2014. "Use of average data of 181 synoptic stations for estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration by temperature-based methods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(12), pages 4237-4255, September.
    4. Shao, Guomin & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Zhang, Liyuan & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Yu, 2023. "Prediction of maize crop coefficient from UAV multisensor remote sensing using machine learning methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. C. Harris & A. Quinn & J. Bridgeman, 2013. "Quantification of uncertainty sources in a probabilistic climate change assessment of future water shortages," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 317-329, November.
    6. Peddinti, Srinivasa Rao & Kambhammettu, BVN P, 2019. "Dynamics of crop coefficients for citrus orchards of central India using water balance and eddy covariance flux partition techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 68-77.
    7. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Jayashree T R & NV Subba Reddy & U Dinesh Acharya, 2023. "Modeling Daily Reference Evapotranspiration from Climate Variables: Assessment of Bagging and Boosting Regression Approaches," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(3), pages 1013-1032, February.
    9. Dilip Kumar Roy & Tapash Kumar Sarkar & Sujit Kumar Biswas & Bithin Datta, 2023. "Generalized Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Models Based on a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Tuned Fuzzy Tree Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 193-218, January.
    10. Zhang, Fan & Cai, Yanpeng & Tan, Qian & Wang, Xuan, 2021. "Spatial water footprint optimization of crop planting: A fuzzy multiobjective optimal approach based on MOD16 evapotranspiration products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    11. Dexi Zhan & Yongqi Mu & Wenxu Duan & Mingzhu Ye & Yingqiang Song & Zhenqi Song & Kaizhong Yao & Dengkuo Sun & Ziqi Ding, 2023. "Spatial Prediction and Mapping of Soil Water Content by TPE-GBDT Model in Chinese Coastal Delta Farmland with Sentinel-2 Remote Sensing Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Hao, Pengyu & Di, Liping & Guo, Liying, 2022. "Estimation of crop evapotranspiration from MODIS data by combining random forest and trapezoidal models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Clara Hohmann & Gottfried Kirchengast & Steffen Birk, 2018. "Alpine foreland running drier? Sensitivity of a drought vulnerable catchment to changes in climate, land use, and water management," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 179-193, March.
    14. Long Zhao & Liwen Xing & Yuhang Wang & Ningbo Cui & Hanmi Zhou & Yi Shi & Sudan Chen & Xinbo Zhao & Zhe Li, 2023. "Prediction Model for Reference Crop Evapotranspiration Based on the Back-propagation Algorithm with Limited Factors," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(3), pages 1207-1222, February.
    15. Yang, Yong & Chen, Rensheng & Han, Chuntan & Liu, Zhangwen, 2021. "Evaluation of 18 models for calculating potential evapotranspiration in different climatic zones of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12333-:d:1216507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.