IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10301-d1182846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development Goals and Climate Change in Spanish Technology Disciplines’ Curricula: From LOMCE to LOMLOE

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Núñez-Sánchez

    (Departamento de Química Física, CINBIO, Universidade de Vigo, Campus Universitario As Lagoas, Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
    Centro de Física das Universidades do Minho e do Porto (CF-UM-UP), Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Maria João Valente

    (Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultade de Educación e Traballo Social, Universidade de Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain)

Abstract

Understanding the prevalence of climate change and sustainable development in the new curriculum of compulsory secondary education (ESO) and the baccalaureate is crucial for educational communities in Spain. However, there was a lack of studies that examined the integration of climate change and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as cross-cutting themes in the new education framework, particularly in the technology disciplines. This study aimed to address this gap by conducting a comparative analysis of the new legislative content (LOMLOE) and the previous legislation (LOMCE). The analysis quantified the presence of keywords related to climate change and sustainable development in both legal texts, focusing on the definition of objectives, level skills, evaluation criteria, and blocks of knowledge. Additionally, the study assessed the inclusion of SDGs and the ethical implications associated with the use and production of technologies at both education levels. The analysis of the curriculum content revealed a significant presence of references to climate change, sustainable development, and SDGs throughout the LOMLOE curriculum, particularly in the baccalaureate. Notably, education’s role in addressing climate change and promoting sustainable development was explicitly recognized as an objective at this level. Regarding technology disciplines, LOMLOE placed considerable emphasis on fostering awareness of the environmental impact of technological development by introducing a new cross-level knowledge block named “Sustainable Technology”, spanning from ESO to the final courses of baccalaureate. This integration was further reinforced by evaluation criteria and specific skills that strongly aligned with sustainability principles, encouraging assessments centred around environmental awareness, ethical responsibilities, and sustainable entrepreneurship. Further studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating SDGs and climate change into technology disciplines following the implementation of LOMLOE, with the aim of identifying best practices for effectively combatting climate change and promoting sustainability in technology education.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Núñez-Sánchez & Maria João Valente, 2023. "Sustainable Development Goals and Climate Change in Spanish Technology Disciplines’ Curricula: From LOMCE to LOMLOE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10301-:d:1182846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisa Gavari-Starkie & Josep Pastrana-Huguet & Inmaculada Navarro-González & Patricia-Teresa Espinosa-Gutiérrez, 2021. "The Inclusion of Resilience as an Element of the Sustainable Dimension in the LOMLOE Curriculum in a European Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Lubna Rashid, 2019. "Entrepreneurship Education and Sustainable Development Goals: A literature Review and a Closer Look at Fragile States and Technology-Enabled Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirela Mazilu & Amalia Niță & Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Oana Mititelu-Ionuș, 2023. "Fostering Urban Destination Prosperity through Post COVID-19 Sustainable Tourism in Craiova, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Cristina Momete & Manuel Mihail Momete, 2021. "Map and Track the Performance in Education for Sustainable Development across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Laura Helen Middermann, 2020. "Do Immigrant Entrepreneurs Have Natural Cognitive Advantages for International Entrepreneurial Activity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Joseph Owuondo, 2023. "A Comparative Study of Entrepreneurial Education and Startup Ecosystems: United States vs. Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(10), pages 115-123, October.
    4. Tõnis Mets & Jack Holbrook & Siim Läänelaid, 2021. "Entrepreneurship Education Challenges for Green Transformation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Noor Hamwy & Jennifer Bruder & Abdellatif Sellami & Michael H. Romanowski, 2023. "Challenges to Teachers Implementing Sustainable Development Goals Frameworks in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Tangfei Xiong & Jianjun Zhang & Huiyan Huang, 2023. "Entrepreneurship Education for Training the Talent in China: Exploring the Influencing Factors and Their Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Carissa Tibia Walidayni & Dina Dellyana & Evy Rachmawati Chaldun, 2023. "Towards SDGs 4 and 8: How Value Co-Creation Affecting Entrepreneurship Education’s Quality and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Alexandra Zamfirache & Titus Suciu & Carmen Elena Anton & Ruxandra-Gabriela Albu & Ioana-Simona Ivasciuc, 2023. "The Interest Shown by Potential Young Entrepreneurs in Romania Regarding Feasible Funding Sources, in the Context of a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Lubna Rashid, 2022. "Bursting the bubble: why sustainability initiatives often lack adequate intention to action translation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 1-9, June.
    10. Charlotte S. Diepolder & Holger Weitzel & Johannes Huwer, 2021. "Competence Frameworks of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Yasemin Eroglu & Lubna Rashid, 2022. "The Impact of Perceived Support and Barriers on the Sustainable Orientation of Turkish Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    12. María García-Feijoo & Almudena Eizaguirre & Alvaro Rica-Aspiunza, 2020. "Systematic Review of Sustainable-Development-Goal Deployment in Business Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Rashid, Lubna & Alzafari, Khaled & Kratzer, Jan, 2020. "Founder Personalities, Behaviors and New Venture Success in Sub-Saharan Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Jane Lu Hsu & Maja Pivec, 2021. "Integration of Sustainability Awareness in Entrepreneurship Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Corina-Ionela Dumitrescu & Georgiana Moiceanu & Razvan-Mihai Dobrescu & Mirona Ana Maria Popescu, 2022. "Analysis of UNESCO ESD Priority Areas’ Implementation in Romanian HEIs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Lammers, Thorsten & Rashid, Lubna & Kratzer, Jan & Voinov, Alexey, 2022. "An analysis of the sustainability goals of digital technology start-ups in Berlin," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Simpy Malhotra & Ravi Kiran, 2023. "Examining the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Perceived Behaviour, Intentions, and Competencies as Catalysts for Sustainable Growth: An Indian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Susana Romero & Marian Aláez & Daniel Amo & David Fonseca, 2020. "Systematic Review of How Engineering Schools around the World Are Deploying the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10301-:d:1182846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.