IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8698-d1157592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Fish Habitat Quality to Weir Distribution Change in Mountainous River Based on the Two-Dimensional Habitat Suitability Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Wang

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Jihong Xia

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Wangwei Cai

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Zewen Liu

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Jingjiang Li

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Jingyun Yin

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Jiayi Zu

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Chuanbin Dou

    (College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

Weirs are often constructed on mountainous rivers because of their low construction costs and their ability to provide irrigation and facilitate landscaping, yet there is little research on how fish habitat quality in mountainous rivers responds to weir distribution. This study categorized the distribution characteristics of weirs on typical reaches according to their sinuosity and calculated the corresponding habitat suitability index ( HSI ) and weighted usable area ( WUA ) under various discharge conditions using a coupled MIKE21 and habitat suitability model. Then, the relationship between the distribution characteristics of weirs and the quality of fish habitats under different discharge conditions was analyzed. The results show that weirs in mountainous rivers can affect the habitat suitability of the rivers, but this effect is closely related to discharge conditions and layout mainly because the key hydraulic factors that determine habitat quality for different sinuous reaches vary under different discharge conditions. This study found that in high-sinuosity rivers with high discharge conditions, water depth is the key factor determining the quality of fish habitats, so weirs can improve habitat quality by improving the suitability of downstream water depth. However, in other conditions, velocity is the key factor determining habitat quality, in which case weirs cannot improve habitat quality and can even degrade it. Therefore, other methods of improving velocity are needed to enhance habitat quality. The results of this study provide a reference for the protection of fish habitats in mountainous river channels and the determination of suitable locations for weir construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Wang & Jihong Xia & Wangwei Cai & Zewen Liu & Jingjiang Li & Jingyun Yin & Jiayi Zu & Chuanbin Dou, 2023. "Response of Fish Habitat Quality to Weir Distribution Change in Mountainous River Based on the Two-Dimensional Habitat Suitability Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8698-:d:1157592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8698/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8698/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi, Yujun & Cheng, Xi & Yang, Zhifeng & Wieprecht, Silke & Zhang, Shanghong & Wu, Yingjie, 2017. "Evaluating the ecological influence of hydraulic projects: A review of aquatic habitat suitability models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 748-762.
    2. Meixler, Marcia S. & Bain, Mark B. & Todd Walter, M., 2009. "Predicting barrier passage and habitat suitability for migratory fish species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2782-2791.
    3. Christoph Hauer & Günther Unfer & Hubert Holzmann & Stefan Schmutz & Helmut Habersack, 2013. "The impact of discharge change on physical instream habitats and its response to river morphology," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 827-850, February.
    4. Wang, Fei & Lin, Binliang, 2013. "Modelling habitat suitability for fish in the fluvial and lacustrine regions of a new Eco-City," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 267(C), pages 115-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Yong & Sun, Zhiyu & Fang, Hongwei & Bai, Sen & Huang, Lei & He, Guojian, 2020. "Habitat succession of the Yangtze finless porpoise in Poyang Lake under the changing hydrodynamic and feeding environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    2. Moung-Jin Lee & Wonkyong Song & Saro Lee, 2015. "Habitat Mapping of the Leopard Cat ( Prionailurus bengalensis ) in South Korea Using GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Davor Kvočka & Roger Falconer & Michaela Bray, 2015. "Appropriate model use for predicting elevations and inundation extent for extreme flood events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1791-1808, December.
    4. Choi, Jong-Kuk & Oh, Hyun-Joo & Koo, Bon Joo & Ryu, Joo-Hyung & Lee, Saro, 2011. "Crustacean habitat potential mapping in a tidal flat using remote sensing and GIS," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1522-1533.
    5. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Marcos-Garcia, Patricia & Lopez-Nicolas, Antonio & Martínez-García, Francisco J. & Pulido-Velazquez, Manuel & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2018. "Combining literature-based and data-driven fuzzy models to predict brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) spawning habitat degradation induced by climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 386(C), pages 98-114.
    6. Boudreault, Jeremie & Bergeron, Normand E & St-Hilaire, Andre & Chebana, Fateh, 2022. "A new look at habitat suitability curves through functional data analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    7. Weiwei Yao & Yuansheng Chen & Guoan Yu & Mingzhong Xiao & Xiaoyi Ma & Fakai Lei, 2018. "Developing a Model to Assess the Potential Impact of TUM Hydropower Turbines on Small River Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Yao, Weiwei, 2021. "Ecohydraulic tools for aquatic fauna habitat and population status assessment, analysis and monitoring aimed at promoting integrated river management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    9. Penczak, T. & Głowacki, Ł. & Kruk, A. & Galicka, W., 2012. "Implementation of a self-organizing map for investigation of impoundment impact on fish assemblages in a large, lowland river: Long-term study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 64-71.
    10. Kwadwo Owusu & Paul W. K. Yankson & Alex B. Asiedu & Peter B. Obour, 2017. "Resource utilization conflict in downstream non‐resettled communities of the Bui Dam in Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 234-243, November.
    11. Wei Xu, 2020. "Study on Multi-Objective Operation Strategy for Multi-Reservoirs in Small-Scale Watershed Considering Ecological Flows," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4725-4738, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8698-:d:1157592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.