IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4595-d792053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Environmental Worldviews: Investigating the Dimensionality of the New Environmental Paradigm Scale for Children in a Large Central European Sample

Author

Listed:
  • Iván Zsolt Berze

    (Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1064 Budapest, Hungary
    Institute of People–Environment Transaction, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1075 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Attila Varga

    (Institute of People–Environment Transaction, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1075 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ferenc Mónus

    (Institute of Psychology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Katalin Néder

    (PontVelem Nonprofit Ltd., 2092 Budakeszi, Hungary)

  • Andrea Dúll

    (Institute of People–Environment Transaction, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1075 Budapest, Hungary
    Department of Sociology and Communication, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

A complex research program linked to the national Sustainability Thematic Week (STW) educational program was launched in 2020 to examine Hungarian primary and secondary school students’ environmental attitudes, behaviors, and awareness. The Hungarian newly developed version of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for Children was used in a large sample ( N = 9396). The results of a set of factor analyses suggested that the NEP Scale for Children cannot be considered unidimensional. We found three distinct and valid factors (Questioning of Human Intervention, Rights of Nature, and Eco-Crisis) with significant associations, having partially different directions, with gender, age, pro-environmental behavior, and economic-technical aspects of environmental worldviews, providing thus new evidence for the highly complex structural characteristics of pro-environmental attitudes and worldviews. Our results might contribute to solving the issues, misunderstandings, and challenges that are related to the dimensionality of the NEP Scale and, even after decades of use, make the comparison of international research difficult.

Suggested Citation

  • Iván Zsolt Berze & Attila Varga & Ferenc Mónus & Katalin Néder & Andrea Dúll, 2022. "Measuring Environmental Worldviews: Investigating the Dimensionality of the New Environmental Paradigm Scale for Children in a Large Central European Sample," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4595-:d:792053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bethany Woodworth & Michelle Steen-Adams & Prashant Mittal, 2011. "Role of an environmental studies course on the formation of environmental worldviews: a case study of a core curriculum requirement using the NEP Scale," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 126-137, June.
    2. Efrat Eilam & Tamar Trop, 2012. "Environmental Attitudes and Environmental Behavior—Which Is the Horse and Which Is the Cart?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-37, September.
    3. Stamatios Ntanos & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos & Michalis Skordoulis & Miltiadis Chalikias & Garyfallos Arabatzis, 2019. "An Application of the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) Scale in a Greek Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mketo, Ally Rajab & Ringo, Cliford J. & Nuhu, Said & Mpambije, Chakupewa Joseph, 2022. "Enhancing community participation for environmental health improvement in rural Tanzania: Evidence from Bukombe district," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Edit Kővári & Katalin Formádi & Zsuzsanna Banász, 2023. "The Green Attitude of Four European Capitals of Culture’s Youth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Claudio Siminelli, 2017. "Consumer behaviours and attitudes towards a circular economy: Knowledge and culture as determinants in a four-market analysis," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1-2), pages 135-169.
    4. Chuanhui Liao & Hui Li, 2019. "Environmental Education, Knowledge, and High School Students’ Intention toward Separation of Solid Waste on Campus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Jennifer Bernstein, 2020. "(Dis)agreement over what? The challenge of quantifying environmental worldviews," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 169-177, June.
    6. Najam uz Zehra Gardezi & Brent S. Steel & Angela Lavado, 2020. "The Impact of Efficacy, Values, and Knowledge on Public Preferences Concerning Food–Water–Energy Policy Tradeoffs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Theodoros Anagnostopoulos & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Stamatios Ntanos & Eleni Gkika & Sofia Asonitou, 2020. "Intelligent Predictive Analytics for Sustainable Business Investment in Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.
    8. Ahmad Karnama & Ricardo Vinuesa, 2020. "Organic Growth Theory for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-10, October.
    9. Croce, Antonello Ignazio & Musolino, Giuseppe & Rindone, Corrado & Vitetta, Antonino, 2019. "Sustainable mobility and energy resources: A quantitative assessment of transport services with electrical vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Filipe Soares & André Madureira & Andreu Pagès & António Barbosa & António Coelho & Fernando Cassola & Fernando Ribeiro & João Viana & José Andrade & Marina Dorokhova & Nélson Morais & Nicolas Wyrsch , 2021. "FEEdBACk: An ICT-Based Platform to Increase Energy Efficiency through Buildings’ Consumer Engagement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-43, March.
    11. Matsiori, Steriani K., 2020. "Application of the New Environmental Paradigm to Greece: A critical case study," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 335-344.
    12. Robert Inkpen & Brian Baily, 2020. "Environmental beliefs and their role in environmental behaviours of undergraduate students," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 57-67, March.
    13. Brent S. Steel & Erika Allen Wolters & Rebecca L. Warner, 2019. "Public Preferences for Food–Energy–Water Tradeoffs in the Western U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Marta Cholewa-Wiktor, 2021. "The Concept of Sustainable Development in the Curriculum of the Medical Universities in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 72-86.
    15. M. M. Sulphey & Nassar Saad AlKahtani & Nabil Ahmed Mareai Senan & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2023. "New Environmental Paradigm, Environmental Attitude, and Proenvironmental Behaviour as Antecedents of Environmental Sustainability," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 418-427, May.
    16. Dimitrios Drosos & Michalis Skordoulis & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Nikos Tsotsolas & Spyros Galatsidas, 2019. "Measuring Industrial Customer Satisfaction: The Case of the Natural Gas Market in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Efi Drimili & Ζoi Gareiou & Efthimios Zervas, 2020. "Public perceptions of the concept of green growth: application in Athens, Greece, during a period of economic crisis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6053-6076, October.
    18. Tea Golob & Matej Makarovič, 2022. "Meta-Reflexivity as a Way toward Responsible and Sustainable Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Rūtenis Jančius & Algirdas Gavenauskas & Antanas Ūsas, 2021. "The Influence of Values and the Social Environment on the Environmental Attitudes of Students: The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Andreas Errikos Delegkos & Michalis Skordoulis & Petros Kalantonis & Aggelia Xanthopoulou, 2022. "Integrated Reporting and Value Relevance in the Energy Sector: The Case of European Listed Firms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4595-:d:792053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.