IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4261-d786502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the Design Industry on Carbon Emissions in the Manufacturing Industry in China: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Xu

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Haoxiang Qu

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

Abstract

Reducing carbon emissions during the manufacturing process is a top priority for realizing the strategic “carbon neutral” target. Currently, there is a great deal of research about carbon production in the middle and later stages of production. However, studies on upstream processes are relatively scarce. Studies concerning the design stages are particularly uncommon, although this phase has a profound effect on carbon emissions during manufacturing. Therefore, it is vital to study this and related fields in depth. In this paper, we take Zhejiang Province, China, as the research object, and study the relationship between the design industry and carbon emissions in the manufacturing industry. Through analysis, we developed a first-level evaluation index for the influence of design on carbon emissions in the production stage. Then, we subdivided the first-level indexes into several second-level indexes using the entropy method. Subsequently, we calculated their weights and comprehensively evaluated the influence of these design factors on carbon emissions in the manufacturing industry using the ridge regression model test. Results from our research reveal that at the design end of the production chain, the expansion of resource scale of each design phase has a significant inhibitory effect on the carbon emissions of the manufacturing stage. Conversely, improvements to the industrial economic benefit index have a significant positive effect on the carbon emissions in the manufacturing industry, while government support and the innovation composite index have little influence. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: To reduce carbon emissions in the manufacturing industry, the scale of the inhibitory effect of the design process should be fully evaluated, while the scale construction and related resource input of the design phase should be emphasized. Furthermore, guidance regarding the social responsibility of design enterprises should be strengthened to further promote the concept of “green design” and reverse the purely market-oriented focus of the industry. Also, to promote a greener design industry, the provision of high-quality green design talents should be fortified. In the future, an appropriate green design evaluation index system should be devised to ensure the stable economic development of the design industry and challenge the current situation where a focus on economic indexes results in increased carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Xu & Haoxiang Qu, 2022. "Impact of the Design Industry on Carbon Emissions in the Manufacturing Industry in China: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4261-:d:786502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4261/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4261/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhonghang Bai & Lei Mu & Hsiung-Cheng Lin, 2020. "Green Product Design Based on the BioTRIZ Multi-Contradiction Resolution Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Shaorui Li & Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Antony Paulraj & Kuo-chung Shang, 2016. "Proactive environmental strategies and performance: role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2136-2151, April.
    3. Caroline Chapain & Roberta Comunian, 2010. "Enabling and Inhibiting the Creative Economy: The Role of the Local and Regional Dimensions in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 717-734.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bérubé, Julie, 2023. "Pandemic and Cultural Industries in a Regional Context," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 15(2), pages 493-516, July.
    2. Oksana Seroka‐Stolka, 2023. "Towards sustainability: An environmental strategy choice, environmental performance, and the moderating role of stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5992-6007, December.
    3. Alfredo Monte & Luca Pennacchio, 2020. "Historical roots of regional entrepreneurship: the role of knowledge and creativity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Amitrajeet A. BATABYAL & Seung JICK YOO, 2018. "A Measurement Issue Regarding The Link Between A Region'S Creative Infrastructure And Its Income," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(3), pages 127-132, December.
    5. Xinyue Hao & Fanglin Chen & Zhongfei Chen, 2022. "Does green innovation increase enterprise value?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1232-1247, March.
    6. Christopher Meyer & Laima Gerlitz & Monika Klein, 2022. "Creativity as a Key Constituent for Smart Specialization Strategies (S3), What Is in It for Peripheral Regions? Co-creating Sustainable and Resilient Tourism with Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    7. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    8. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Riccardo Welters & Ryan Daniel & Katja Fleischmann, 2018. "Creative industries in a regional city: How much work is lost to rivals based elsewhere?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(1), pages 63-84, February.
    10. Hien Vo Van & Tu Thanh Hoai & Nha Nguyen Minh & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2023. "Green Transformational Leadership and Green Mindfulness as Contributors to Green Innovation and Environmental Performance: Evidence From Manufacturing Firms in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    11. Neil Lee, 2014. "The Creative Industries and Urban Economic Growth in the UK," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(2), pages 455-470, February.
    12. Ying Luo & Xiaowen Jie & Xiaoping Li & Liming Yao, 2018. "Ranking Chinese SMEs Green Manufacturing Drivers Using a Novel Hybrid Multi-Criterion Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Fabrizio Montanari & Annachiara Scapolan & Lorenzo Mizzau, 2018. "Embeddedness and locational choices: A study of creative workers in a dance organisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1121-1138, April.
    14. Namyślak Beata, 2019. "Regional diversification of cultural sector potential in Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 45(45), pages 95-107, September.
    15. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2014. "Creative city policy in the context of urban asymmetry," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(8), pages 854-867, December.
    16. Andersén, Jim, 2021. "A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Enda Murphy & Linda Fox-Rogers & Declan Redmond, 2015. "Location Decision Making of “Creative” Industries: The Media and Computer Game Sectors in Dublin, Ireland," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 97-113, March.
    18. Fangyu Gu & Yu Xie, 2022. "The differential impacts of coercive pressure from environmental law and proactive environmental strategy on corporate environmental performance: The case study of a pulp and paper company," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1909-1925, September.
    19. Ardian Qorri & Saranda Gashi & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta‐analysis of moderators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 194-216, January.
    20. Nisha Paul Kulangara & Markus Biehl & Edmund L. Prater, 2022. "Environmentally sustainable development initiatives in upstream strategic outsourcing relationships: Examining the role of innovative capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3014-3027, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4261-:d:786502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.