IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4224-d785743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource Management as Part of Sustainable Urban District Development

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Koller

    (DECHEMA Gesellschaft für Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e.V., 60326 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Karl Eckert

    (StadtLand GmbH, 04105 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Uwe Ferber

    (StadtLand GmbH, 04105 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Gudrun Gräbe

    (Fraunhofer Institut für Chemische Technologie ICT, 76327 Pfinztal, Germany)

  • Maic Verbücheln

    (Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik gGmbH, 10969 Berlin, Germany)

  • Katja Wendler

    (DECHEMA Gesellschaft für Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e.V., 60326 Frankfurt, Germany)

Abstract

Rising urban populations, limited natural resources (following the German Federal Environmental Agency, natural resources are resources that are part of nature. They include renewable and non-renewable primary raw materials, physical spaces (surface areas), environmental media (water, soil, air), flowing resources (e.g., geothermal, wind, tidal and solar energy) and biodiversity. It is irrelevant here whether the resources serve as sources for producing products or as sinks for absorbing emissions (water, soil, air)) and climate change require a new approach to urban planning. Recently, international, European and national programmes, concepts and framework documents have been created to promote the implementation of measures for more sustainability, resource efficiency and climate resilience in urban districts. In the funding measure of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research’s “Resource-Efficient Urban Districts for the Future-RES:Z”, twelve funded research project networks are dedicated to understanding the impacts that urban districts have on the resources of land, water and material flows, as well as the resulting impacts on urban green spaces and energy issues. By considering the different resources involved, it is shown that the optimisation of their use cannot take place independently of each other. This may even lead to conflicting goals. Use conflicts can be recognised at an early stage and measures can be tailored to the specific neighbourhood context when applying an integrated approach that provides a common view on all of the aforementioned resources. Special attention is paid to solutions which create numerous benefits i.e., multifunctionality. The RES:Z funding measure utilises living labs for the research on and implementation of solutions. This lays the foundation for a sustainable transformation of urban districts and the basis for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Koller & Karl Eckert & Uwe Ferber & Gudrun Gräbe & Maic Verbücheln & Katja Wendler, 2022. "Resource Management as Part of Sustainable Urban District Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4224-:d:785743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sofie Pandis Iverot & Nils Brandt, 2011. "The development of a sustainable urban district in Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm, Sweden?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(6), pages 1043-1064, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hossein Komasi & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Olegas Prentkovskis & Paulius Skačkauskas, 2022. "Urban Competitiveness: Identification and Analysis of Sustainable Key Drivers (A Case Study in Iran)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Yi Song Liu & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda & Kenan Degirmenci & Aaron Liu & Michael Kane, 2022. "Leveraging the Opportunities of Wind for Cities through Urban Planning and Design: A PRISMA Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-78, September.
    3. Rebekka Volk & Thomas Lützkendorf, 2023. "Editorial: Special Issue “Resource Management in Urban Districts—A Contribution to Sustainable Urban Development”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-5, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xavier Faure & Tim Johansson & Oleksii Pasichnyi, 2022. "The Impact of Detail, Shadowing and Thermal Zoning Levels on Urban Building Energy Modelling (UBEM) on a District Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Adil, Ali M. & Ko, Yekang, 2016. "Socio-technical evolution of Decentralized Energy Systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1025-1037.
    3. Anette Hallin & Tina Karrbom‐Gustavsson & Peter Dobers, 2021. "Transition towards and of sustainability—Understanding sustainability as performative," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1948-1957, May.
    4. Daniël M Bossuyt & Federico Savini, 2018. "Urban sustainability and political parties: Eco-development in Stockholm and Amsterdam," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 1006-1026, September.
    5. Jonas Lind & Tove Malmqvist & Josefin Wangel, 2019. "Key Considerations When Designing Certification Systems for Urban Sustainability and Implications for The Swedish Post-Construction System Citylab," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Candel, Melissa & Paulsson, Jenny, 2023. "Enhancing public value with co-creation in public land development: The role of municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Zaheer Allam & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud & Carlos Moreno, 2022. "The Theoretical, Practical, and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Iveroth, Sofie Pandis & Johansson, Stefan & Brandt, Nils, 2013. "The potential of the infrastructural system of Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm, Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 716-726.
    9. Luka Oreskovic & Rajat Gupta, 2022. "Enabling Sustainable Lifestyles in New Urban Areas: Evaluation of an Eco-Development Case Study in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Jonas Lind & Tove Malmqvist & Josefin Wangel, 2020. "Developing Citylab Post-Construction—A Swedish Certification System to Evaluate the Sustainability of Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Haohui Wu & Yajuan Yu & Shanshan Li & Kai Huang, 2018. "An Empirical Study of the Assessment of Green Development in Beijing, China: Considering Resource Depletion, Environmental Damage and Ecological Benefits Simultaneously," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Zaheer Allam & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud & Carlos Moreno, 2022. "The Theoretical, Practical, and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability," Post-Print hal-03997394, HAL.
    13. Paiho, Satu & Hoang, Ha & Hukkalainen, Mari, 2017. "Energy and emission analyses of solar assisted local energy solutions with seasonal heat storage in a Finnish case district," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 147-155.
    14. Udo Pesch & Anne-Lorène Vernay & Ellen van Bueren & Sofie Pandis Iverot, 2017. "Niche entrepreneurs in urban systems integration: On the role of individuals in niche formation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1922-1942, August.
    15. Bibri, Simon Elias, 2022. "Eco-districts and data-driven smart eco-cities: Emerging approaches to strategic planning by design and spatial scaling and evaluation by technology," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4224-:d:785743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.