IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2026-d746487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Sound Auralization and Visualization Framework—Case Study at IHTApark

Author

Listed:
  • Josep Llorca-Bofí

    (Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany)

  • Christian Dreier

    (Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany)

  • Jonas Heck

    (Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany)

  • Michael Vorländer

    (Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany)

Abstract

In the context of acoustic urban planning, the use of noise mappings is a worldwide well-established practice. Therefore, the noise levels in an urban environment are calculated based on models of the sound sources, models of the physical sound propagation effects and the position of the receivers in the area of interest. However, the noise mapping method is limited to sound levels in frequency bands due to missing temporal and spectral information of the sound signals. This, in turn, leads to missing information about the qualitative sound properties, as they can be evaluated in psychoacoustic parameters. Beyond the scope of the classical noise mapping, auralization and physically-based simulation of sound fields can be applied to urban scenarios in the context of urban soundscape analysis. By supporting the auralization technology with a visual counterpart of the urban space, a plausible virtual representation of a real environment can be achieved. The presented framework combines the possibilities of the open-source auralization tool Virtual Acoustics with 3D visualization. In order to enable studies with natural human response or for public communication of urban design projects, those virtual scenes can be either reproduced with immersive technologies—such head-mounted displays (HMD)—or using online video platforms and traditional playback devices. The paper presents an overview of what physical principles can already be simulated, which technological considerations need to be taken into account, and how to set up such environment for auralization and visualization of urban scenes. We present the framework by the case study of IHTApark.

Suggested Citation

  • Josep Llorca-Bofí & Christian Dreier & Jonas Heck & Michael Vorländer, 2022. "Urban Sound Auralization and Visualization Framework—Case Study at IHTApark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2026-:d:746487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2026/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2026/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimiliano Masullo & Luigi Maffei & Aniello Pascale & Vincenzo Paolo Senese & Simona De Stefano & Chi Kwan Chau, 2021. "Effects of Evocative Audio-Visual Installations on the Restorativeness in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and Cities," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 39-51, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raffaello Bronzini & Paolo Piselli, 2006. "Determinants of long-run regional productivity: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 597, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    2. Dominic Regan & Gene Tunny, 2008. "Venture capital in Australia," Economic Roundup, The Treasury, Australian Government, issue 1, pages 1-13, March.
    3. David Rigby, 2012. "The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1218, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2012.
    4. Taylor Shelton & Matthew Zook & Alan Wiig, 2015. "Editor's choice The ‘actually existing smart city’," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 13-25.
    5. Ana María Fernández-Maldonado & Arie Romein, 2012. "The Sustainability of Knowledge-related Policies in Technology-based Cities in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Lirong Kou & Mei-Po Kwan & Yanwei Chai, 2021. "The effects of activity-related contexts on individual sound exposures: A time–geographic approach to soundscape studies," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 2073-2092, September.
    7. Aura-Luciana Istrate & Vojtěch Bosák & Alexandr Nováček & Ondřej Slach, 2020. "How Attractive for Walking Are the Main Streets of a Shrinking City?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Belenesi Marioara & Bogdan Victoria & Popa Dorina, 2013. "Measures Investingating The Characteristics Of Accounting In Knowledge-Based Economy. Study Regarding The Evolution Of The Romanian Ict Industry In 2007-2011," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 485-497, December.
    9. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & David Rigby & Ron Boschma, 2015. "The technological resilience of US cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 167-184.
    10. Christophe Carrincazeaux & Frédéric Gaschet, 2006. "Knowledge and the diversity of innovation systems: a comparative analysis of European regions," Post-Print hal-00257384, HAL.
    11. Chan-Yuan Wong & Boon-Kwee Ng & Suzana Ariff Azizan & Maisarah Hasbullah, 2018. "Knowledge Structures of City Innovation Systems: Singapore and Hong Kong," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 47-73, January.
    12. Laura Wolf-Powers, 2013. "Predictors of Employment Growth and Unemployment in U.S. Central Cities, 1990-2010," Upjohn Working Papers 13-199, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    13. Ron Boschma & Carlo Gianelle, 2014. "Regional Branching and Smart Specialisation Policy," JRC Research Reports JRC88242, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Clara Turner & Marco R Di Tommaso & Chiara Pollio & Karen Chapple, 2020. "Who will win the electric vehicle race? The role of place-based assets and policy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 337-362, June.
    15. Julie Tian Miao & Peter Hall, 2014. "Optical Illusion? The Growth and Development of the Optics Valley of China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(5), pages 863-879, October.
    16. Patrick S Vitale, 2017. "Making science suburban: The suburbanization of industrial research and the invention of “research manâ€," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(12), pages 2813-2834, December.
    17. Jean-Dominique Polack & Philippe Taupin & Hyun In Jo & Jin Yong Jeon, 2022. "Urban Soundscapes in the Imaginaries of Native Digital Users: Guidelines for Soundscape Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Ortega-Argilés , Raquel & Moreno, Rosina, 2009. "Evidence on the role of ownership structure on firms’ innovative performance," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 15, pages 231-250.
    19. Ron Boschma & Víctor Martín & Asier Minondo, 2017. "Neighbour regions as the source of new industries," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(2), pages 227-245, June.
    20. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Gagliardi, Luisa, 2015. "Moving people with ideas - innovation inter-regional mobility and firm heterogeneity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64509, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2026-:d:746487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.