IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p611-d719102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Green Brand Crises on Green Brand Trust: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Gen Li

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xixiang Sun

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

In recent years, brand crises and greenwashing events have become common for Chinese consumers. However, compared to ordinary brands, it is more challenging for green brands to rebuild trust relationships with consumers after a green brand crisis due to their unique energy-saving and environmental protection attributes. The impact mechanism of green brand crises on consumer trust is complicated. To evaluate the different effects of different types of crises, this study used a sample of more than 1000 questionnaires to allow a regressive analysis, robustness test, endogenous test, mechanism test, and heterogeneity analysis. The study’s results show that product functional and value-related crises harm green brand trust, and both brand perceived value and perceived risk play an intermediary role in the mechanism. Brand familiarity plays an essential role in the relationship between the green brand crisis and green brand trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Gen Li & Xixiang Sun, 2022. "The Impact of Green Brand Crises on Green Brand Trust: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:611-:d:719102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bozic, Branko & Siebert, Sabina & Martin, Graeme, 2019. "A strategic action fields perspective on organizational trust repair," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 58-66.
    2. Kim, Peter H. & Cooper, Cecily D. & Dirks, Kurt T. & Ferrin, Donald L., 2013. "Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhanna Mingaleva & Natalia Vukovic, 2023. "Brand Management and Innovation Management in the Age of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-6, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alyson Byrne & Julian Barling & Kathryne Dupré, 2014. "Leader Apologies and Employee and Leader Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 91-106, April.
    2. Zhao, Haichuan & Jiang, Lan & Su, Chenting, 2020. "To Defend or Not to Defend? How Responses to Negative Customer Review Affect Prospective customers' Distrust and Purchase Intention," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 45-64.
    3. Keck, Steffen, 2014. "Group reactions to dishonesty," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 1-10.
    4. Susanna Gallani & Ranjani Krishnan & Eric J. Marinich & Michael D. Shields, 2019. "Budgeting, Psychological Contracts, and Budgetary Misreporting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2924-2945, June.
    5. Behrang Samadi & Chong Chin Wei & Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff, 2015. "The Influence of Trust on Knowledge Sharing Behaviour Among Multigenerational Employees," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Dandan Wang & Thomas Walker, 2023. "How to Regain Green Consumer Trust after Greenwashing: Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Virna Zhanna & Olha Lazorko & Liudmyla Malimon, 2021. "The Mode of Trust and Experience of Stress in Customs Officers in Ukraine," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 404-425, August.
    8. Livia Levine, 2019. "Digital Trust and Cooperation with an Integrative Digital Social Contract," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 393-407, December.
    9. Raj, Medha & Wiltermuth, Scott S., 2022. "Better now than later: The social cost of victims’ delayed accusations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Robert Hurley, 2023. "An Organizational Capacity for Trustworthiness: A Dynamic Routines Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 589-601, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:611-:d:719102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.