IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16030-d989704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Ecological Evaluation of Cultural Patterns for the Istanbul Urban Landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Gül Aslı Aksu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kastamonu University, 37150 Kastamonu, Turkey)

  • Şermin Tağıl

    (Department of Geography, Izmir Bakircay University, 35665 Izmir, Turkey)

  • Nebiye Musaoğlu

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Emel Seyrek Canatanoğlu

    (Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Institute of Science, Ege University, 35040 Izmir, Turkey)

  • Adnan Uzun

    (Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design, Isik University, 34980 Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

With the widespread population growth in cities, anthropogenic influences inevitably lead to natural disturbances. The metropolitan area of Istanbul, with its rapid urbanization rate, has faced intense pressure regarding the sustainability of urban habitats. In this context, landscapes comprising patches affected by various disturbances and undergoing temporal changes must be analyzed, in order to assess city-related disturbances. In this study, the main objective was to understand how urbanization changed the function of the spatial distribution of the urban mosaic and, more specifically, its relationship with the size, shape, and connection among land-use classes. For this purpose, we took Besiktas, a district of Istanbul, as the study area. We evaluated the landscape pattern of the urban environment in two stages. First, we used medium-resolution satellite imagery to reveal the general interactions in the urbanization process. Landscape- and class-level landscape metrics were selected to quantify the landscape connectivity, and the distances between classes (green areas and artificial surfaces), patterns, and processes, using five satellite images representing a time span of 51 years (1963, 1984, 1997, 2005, and 2014). The general landscape structure was examined by looking at the temporal–spatial processes of artificial surface and green areas obtained from these medium-resolution satellite images. The trends in selected landscape-level metrics were specified and discussed through the use of a moving window analysis. We then used Pleiades high-resolution satellite imagery (2015) to analyze the landscape structure in more detail. This high-resolution base image allows us to recognize the possibility of classifying basic cultural landscape classes. The findings regarding the spatial arrangement of each class in the areas allocated to 14 cultural landscape classes were interpreted by associating them with the landscape functions. Finally, particulate matter (PM 10 ) concentration data were collected and evaluated as an ecological indicator, in order to reveal the relationships between landscape structure and landscape function. In short, we first evaluated the whole landscape structure using medium-resolution data, followed by the classification of cultural landscapes using high-resolution satellite imagery, providing a time-effective—and, therefore, essential—auxiliary method for landscape evaluation. This two-stage evaluation method enables inferences to be made that can shed light on the landscape functions in an urban environment based on the landscape structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Gül Aslı Aksu & Şermin Tağıl & Nebiye Musaoğlu & Emel Seyrek Canatanoğlu & Adnan Uzun, 2022. "Landscape Ecological Evaluation of Cultural Patterns for the Istanbul Urban Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16030-:d:989704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lijia Zhang & Zihan Zhai & Yan Zhou & Shihan Liu & Liwei Wang, 2022. "The Landscape Pattern Evolution of Typical Open-Pit Coal Mines Based on Land Use in Inner Mongolia of China during 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Chao Xu & Dagmar Haase & Meirong Su & Yutao Wang & Stephan Pauleit, 2020. "Assessment of landscape changes under different urban dynamics based on a multiple-scenario modeling approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1361-1379, October.
    3. Maksymilian Solarski & Robert Krzysztofik, 2021. "Is the Naturalization of the Townscape a Condition of De-Industrialization? An Example of Bytom in Southern Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Shengwang Bao & Fan Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamic of the Land Use/Cover Change and Scenario Simulation in the Southeast Coastal Shelterbelt System Construction Project Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Denise Boehnke & Alice Krehl & Kai Mörmann & Rebekka Volk & Thomas Lützkendorf & Elias Naber & Ronja Becker & Stefan Norra, 2022. "Mapping Urban Green and Its Ecosystem Services at Microscale—A Methodological Approach for Climate Adaptation and Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Margareth Viecco & Sergio Vera & Héctor Jorquera & Waldo Bustamante & Jorge Gironás & Cynnamon Dobbs & Eduardo Leiva, 2018. "Potential of Particle Matter Dry Deposition on Green Roofs and Living Walls Vegetation for Mitigating Urban Atmospheric Pollution in Semiarid Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Karolina Kais & Marlena Gołaś & Marzena Suchocka, 2021. "Awareness of Air Pollution and Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees: The Case Study of Warsaw City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Gül Aslı Aksu & Nigar Küçük, 2020. "Evaluation of urban topography–biotope–population density relations for Istanbul–Beşiktaş urban landscape using AHP," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 733-758, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nausheen Masood & Alessio Russo, 2023. "Community Perception of Brownfield Regeneration through Urban Rewilding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Marcin K. Widomski & Anna Musz-Pomorska & Justyna Gołębiowska, 2023. "Hydrologic Effectiveness and Economic Efficiency of Green Architecture in Selected Urbanized Catchment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Sungwan Son & Aya Elkamhawy & Choon-Man Jang, 2022. "Active Soil Filter System for Indoor Air Purification in School Classrooms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Haozhi Pan & Stan Geertman & Brian Deal, 2020. "What does urban informatics add to planning support technology?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1317-1325, October.
    5. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Robert Krzysztofik & Maksymilian Solarski, 2023. "Planning Recreation around Water Bodies in Two Hard Coal Post-Mining Areas in Southern Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Tori, Felipe & Bustamante, Waldo & Vera, Sergio, 2022. "Analysis of Net Zero Energy Buildings public policies at the residential building sector: A comparison between Chile and selected countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marian Turek, 2022. "The Economic Situation of Polish Cities in Post-Mining Regions. Long-Term Analysis on the Example of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Rebekka Volk & Thomas Lützkendorf, 2023. "Editorial: Special Issue “Resource Management in Urban Districts—A Contribution to Sustainable Urban Development”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-5, March.
    9. Isidro A. Pérez & Mª Ángeles García & Mª Luisa Sánchez & Nuria Pardo & Beatriz Fernández-Duque, 2020. "Key Points in Air Pollution Meteorology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Mustafa Erdem Kabadayı & Paria Ettehadi Osgouei & Elif Sertel, 2022. "Agricultural Land Abandonment in Bulgaria: A Long-Term Remote Sensing Perspective, 1950–1980," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Joanna Badach & Małgorzata Dymnicka & Andrzej Baranowski, 2020. "Urban Vegetation in Air Quality Management: A Review and Policy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-28, February.
    12. Mina Radić & Marta Brković Dodig & Thomas Auer, 2019. "Green Facades and Living Walls—A Review Establishing the Classification of Construction Types and Mapping the Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Bo Wang & Xiaochen Zhang & Chenming Gu & Mei Zhang & Yuanhao Zhao & Jia Jia, 2021. "Magnetism and Grain-Size Distribution of Particles Deposited on the Surface of Urban Trees in Lanzhou City, Northwestern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Eunha Shin & Heungsoon Kim, 2019. "Benefit–Cost Analysis of Green Roof Initiative Projects: The Case of Jung-gu, Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Itxaro Latasa & Angela Laurenz, 2023. "The Residual Spaces of Developmental Urbanism as Opportunity for Green Cities and Improvement of Human Wellbeing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Zipan Cai & Bo Wang & Cong Cong & Vladimir Cvetkovic, 2020. "Spatial dynamic modelling for urban scenario planning: A case study of Nanjing, China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1380-1396, October.
    17. Raziyeh Teimouri & Rasoul Ghorbani & Pooran Karbasi & Ehsan Sharifi, 2023. "Investigation of land use changes using the landscape ecology approach in Maragheh City, Iran," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 271-284, June.
    18. Xinchuang Wang & Wenkai Liu & Hebing Zhang & Fenglian Lu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation Characteristics of Land Ecological Quality and Its Obstacle Factors in the Typical Compound Area of Mine Agriculture Urban," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Ya Shao & Qinxue Xu & Xi Wei, 2023. "Progress of Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Robert Popek & Beata Fornal-Pieniak & Piotr Dąbrowski & Filip Chyliński, 2023. "The Role of Spontaneous Flora in the Mitigation of Particulate Matter from Traffic Roads in an Urbanised Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16030-:d:989704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.