IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15242-d975232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction Procurement Selection Criteria: A Review and Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Zhao

    (Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd. MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China)

  • Fei J Ying

    (Department of Build Environment Engineering, School of Future Environment, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • John Tookey

    (Department of Build Environment Engineering, School of Future Environment, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive literature review that addresses procurement selection criteria associated with procurement system evaluation in the construction sector. The aim is to consolidate the knowledge of construction procurement selection criteria (PSC) and provide future research directions. A systematic literature review (SLR) of 37 peer-reviewed journal articles from 1998 to 2019 in the construction procurement system selection process is carried out to understand the extant theoretical and practical foundations of the field. Two hundred fifty-six PSC have been identified. Descriptive and material analysis reveals (1) PSC evolved to match the promotion of emerging procurement systems in the construction industry; (2) three emerging themes of PSC have been identified, namely procurement systems, decision aid tools, and PSC identification methods; (3) PSC could be classified into generic criteria and unique criteria; (4) geographic location may not have a significant impact on the choice of procurement systems. This work identifies and discusses potential research interests in improving PSC identification. The research path, current trends, and future research directions in construction procurement selection are revealed. The paper provides the foundation and impetus for further investigation into procurement system selection practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Zhao & Fei J Ying & John Tookey, 2022. "Construction Procurement Selection Criteria: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15242-:d:975232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15242/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15242/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Rowlinson & David Yates, 2003. "nDCAD: a virtual change agent for professions and procurement systems?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 849-857.
    2. Sai-On Cheung & Tsun-Ip Lam & Mei-Yung Leung & Yue-Wang Wan, 2001. "An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 427-437.
    3. S. Thomas Ng & Duc Thanh Luu & Swee Eng Chen & Ka Chi Lam, 2002. "Fuzzy membership functions of procurement selection criteria," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 285-296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Per Erik Eriksson & Ossi Pesamaa, 2007. "Modelling procurement effects on cooperation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 893-901.
    2. Franco Cheung & Judy Leung Fung Kuen & Martin Skitmore, 2002. "Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of architectural consultants," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 569-580.
    3. Xiaowei An & Zhuofu Wang & Huimin Li & Jiyong Ding, 2018. "Project Delivery System Selection with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Group Decision-Making Method," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 689-707, August.
    4. Deep Shumank & Simon Laura & Rahimzadeh Ali & Al-Hamdani Sulala & Asim Mohd, 2018. "An Analytical Study of Critical Factors Affecting Contractor Efficiency in Construction Projects in Indian Scenario," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 1794-1802, October.
    5. Ehsan Eshtehardian & Abbas Afshar & Reza Abbasnia, 2008. "Time-cost optimization: using GA and fuzzy sets theory for uncertainties in cost," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 679-691.
    6. Narasimhan, Ram & Talluri, Srinivas & Mahapatra, Santosh, 2008. "Effective response to RFQs and supplier development: A supplier's perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 461-470, October.
    7. Odhigu Festus Onosakponome & Nazatul Shima Abdul Rani & Junaid M. Shaikh, 2011. "Cost Benefit Analysis of Procurement Systems and the Performance of Construction Projects in East Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(5), pages 181-192.
    8. Sofia Lingegård & Malena I. Havenvid & Per-Erik Eriksson, 2021. "Circular Public Procurement through Integrated Contracts in the Infrastructure Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Aghimien Douglas Omoregie & Osanyinro Olufemi & Adegbembo Taiwo Fadeke, 2017. "Cost and time performance of traditional-, direct labour- and management-procured public projects in Ondo State, Nigeria," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 1593-1603, December.
    10. Sai-On Cheung & Henry Suen, 2002. "A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 557-568.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15242-:d:975232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.