IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15092-d972825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Assessing Climate Adaptation Governance on the Caribbean Island of Curaçao

Author

Listed:
  • Esmé de Bruijn

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Carel Dieperink

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Droevendaalsesteeg 110, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly clear that Caribbean islands are very vulnerable to the effects of climate change, such as sea level rise, longer periods of droughts, loss of biodiversity, more extreme weather events (flooding and hurricanes), and increased freshwater demands. Addressing these issues encourages good climate change adaptation governance. So far, however, the literature has not discussed what good governance could mean in this context. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to address this knowledge gap by developing an assessment framework and showing its usefulness. The framework is based on a review of the literature and is applied in an assessment of adaptation practices in Curaçao. The assessment is based on a review of Curaçao policy documents and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. We found that the developed framework was useful for obtaining a better insight into the quality of adaptation governance on Caribbean islands, and that in the Curaçao practices, the good governance principles of transparency and inclusiveness are better elaborated in comparison to connectivity, accountability and government effectiveness. We conclude the paper with some reflections on the potential of the framework and some suggestions for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Esmé de Bruijn & Carel Dieperink, 2022. "A Framework for Assessing Climate Adaptation Governance on the Caribbean Island of Curaçao," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15092-:d:972825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15092/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15092/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gisselquist, Rachel M., 2012. "Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series 030, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Pittman, Jeremy & Armitage, Derek & Alexander, Steven & Campbell, Donovan & Alleyne, Marium, 2015. "Governance fit for climate change in a Caribbean coastal-marine context," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 486-498.
    3. Scobie, Michelle, 2016. "Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean Small Island Developing States," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 16-28.
    4. repec:unu:wpaper:wp2012-30 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Rachel M. Gisselquist, 2012. "Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-030, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobin Im & Kris Hartley, 2019. "Aligning Needs and Capacities to Boost Government Competitiveness," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 119-137, March.
    2. Catacora-Vargas, Georgina & Tambutti, Marcia & Alvarado, Víctor & Rankovic, Aleksandar, 2022. "Governance approaches and practices in Latin America and the Caribbean for transformative change for biodiversity," Documentos de Proyectos 48542, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Guzal-Dec Danuta & Zbucki Łukasz & Kuś Agnieszka, 2020. "Good governance in strategic planning of local development in rural and urban-rural gminas of the eastern peripheral voivodeships of Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 50(50), pages 101-112, December.
    4. Bienvenido Ortega & Antonio Casquero & Jesús Sanjuán, 2016. "Corruption and Convergence in Human Development: Evidence from 69 Countries During 1990–2012," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 691-719, June.
    5. Yami, M. & Mekuria, Wolde, 2022. "Challenges in the governance of community-managed forests in Ethiopia: review," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-14(3):147.
    6. Rachel M. Gisselquist, 2013. "Evaluating Governance Indexes: Critical and Less Critical Questions," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-068, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Gisselquist, Rachel & Niño-Zarazúa, Miguel, 2013. "What can experiments tell us about how to improve governance?," MPRA Paper 49300, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Naseemullah, Adnan, 2023. "The political economy of national development: A research agenda after neoliberal reform?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Chiraag Roy, 2020. "Rethinking Australia’s aid programme to Myanmar: Good governance and “informal constraints”," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(5), pages 630-645, September.
    10. Gisselquist, Rachel M., 2013. "Evaluating Governance Indexes: Critical and Less Critical Questions," WIDER Working Paper Series 068, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Aamir Aijaz Syed & Assad Ullah & Muhammad Abdul Kamal, 2024. "Does economic policy uncertainty impedes financial inclusion in BRICS economies: the mediating role of quality of governance," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Gratiela Georgiana Noja & Mirela Cristea & Nicoleta Sirghi & Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Paolo D’Anselmi, 2019. "Promoting Good Public Governance and Environmental Support for Sustainable Economic Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Amidu Kalokoh & Lada V. Kochtcheeva, 2022. "Governing the artisanal gold mining sector in the Mano River Union: A comparative study of Liberia and Sierra Leone," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1398-1413, October.
    14. Adams, Marshall Alhassan & Kayira, Jean & Tegegne, Yitagesu Tekle & Gruber, James S., 2020. "A comparative analysis of the institutional capacity of FLEGT VPA in Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Ghana, Liberia, and the Republic of the Congo," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Muhammad Azam, 2022. "Governance and Economic Growth: Evidence from 14 Latin America and Caribbean Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1470-1495, June.
    16. Nwebo Osy Ezechukwunyere, 2018. "The African Union Agenda 2063 and the Imperative of Democratic Governance," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 259-276, December.
    17. Sarah BOTTON & Sébastien HARDY & Franck POUPEAU, 2017. "Water from the heights, water from the grassroots: the Governance of common dynamics and public services in La Paz-El Alto," Working Paper af116c25-9d27-46bd-bbbc-3, Agence française de développement.
    18. Fiona Nunan, 2018. "Navigating multi‐level natural resource governance: an analytical guide," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 159-171, August.
    19. Azadi, Hossein, 2020. "Monitoring land governance: Understanding roots and shoots," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Szumowski Witold & Cyfert Szymon, 2018. "A Model for evaluating strategic maturity of the local government," Management, Sciendo, vol. 22(2), pages 7-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15092-:d:972825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.