IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13314-d944170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Justice and Teachers’ Turnover Intention in Primary and Secondary Schools: The Importance of Sustainable Salary Management

Author

Listed:
  • Houyu Zhou

    (Department of Psychology, Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Jianhong Ma

    (Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310007, China)

Abstract

Primary and middle school teachers are a critical part of China’s foundational education; teacher turnover heavily affects the stable development of foundational education. Aiming at the phenomenon of teacher turnover intention in primary and secondary schools, interviews and questionnaires were used to explore the relationship between teachers’ organizational justice, salary satisfaction, and turnover intention in the management of primary and secondary schools. The research subjects were more than 500 primary and secondary school teachers from Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces. The data analysis results show that the sense of interactive fairness is the highest, followed by procedural fairness and the lowest sense of distributional fairness, with a certain sense of unfairness among the three dimensions of organizational fairness among primary and secondary school teachers. The average salary satisfaction score is 2.64, which is lower than the midpoint of 3, and there is a certain degree of dissatisfaction. The results of the correlation analysis showed that the pairwise correlations between the variables reached a very significant level. The results of regression analysis showed that organizational justice had the greatest impact on turnover intention, accounting for 20% of the variance. Salary satisfaction plays a partial mediating role between various dimensions of organizational justice and turnover intention, indicating that procedural fairness, interaction fairness, and distributional justice not only have a direct impact on turnover intention, but also indirectly affect turnover intention by affecting salary satisfaction. The results of this study can provide empirical data support for educational administrative departments and school managers in economically developed regions to improve their compensation management level and implement effective and sustainable compensation management policies and programs, as well as provide first-hand information for cross-country comparative studies of teacher compensation management in the field of education administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Houyu Zhou & Jianhong Ma, 2022. "Organizational Justice and Teachers’ Turnover Intention in Primary and Secondary Schools: The Importance of Sustainable Salary Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13314-:d:944170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robst, John & VanGilder, Jennifer, 2016. "Salary and job satisfaction among economics and business graduates: The effect of match between degree field and job," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 30-40.
    2. Laetitia Hauret & Donald R. Williams, 2019. "Relative Income and Pay Satisfaction: Further Evidence on the Role of the Reference Group," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 307-329, January.
    3. Stavros A. Drakopoulos, 2020. "Pay Level Comparisons in Job Satisfaction Research and Mainstream Economic Methodology," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 825-842, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2023. "The Economics of Wellbeing and Psychology: An Historical and Methodological Viewpoint," MPRA Paper 117891, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Martin, Thomas & Sgroi, Daniel, 2022. "Satisfaction and the potentially misleading power of counter-factual reasoning : a field study set before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdown," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1443, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    3. Zhu, Yu & Xu, Lei, 2022. "Returns to Higher Education - Graduate and Discipline Premiums," IZA Discussion Papers 15299, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Peter Valet, 2023. "Perceptions of Pay Satisfaction and Pay Justice: Two Sides of the Same Coin?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 157-173, February.
    5. Jessica Reale & Frederik Banning & Michael Roos, 2024. "Unemployment Benefits and Job Quality: Unveiling the Complexities of Labour Market Dynamics," Papers 2407.20306, arXiv.org.
    6. Antje Jantsch & Gertrud Buchenrieder & Thomas Dufhues & Judith Möllers, 2024. "Social Comparisons Under Pandemic Stress: Income Reference Groups, Comparison Patterns, and the Subjective Well-Being of German Students," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Seamus McGuinness & Konstantinos Pouliakas & Paul Redmond, 2018. "Skills Mismatch: Concepts, Measurement And Policy Approaches," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 985-1015, September.
    8. Mariana Santis & Marcelo Florensa & María Cecilia Gáname & Pedro Esteban Moncarz, 2021. "Job Satisfaction of Recent University Graduates in Economics Sciences: The Role of the Match Between Formal Education and Job Requirements," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 3157-3197, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13314-:d:944170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.