IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p494-d716934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges for the Integrated Management of Priority Areas for Conservation in Tamaulipas, México

Author

Listed:
  • Frida Carmina Caballero-Rico

    (Center of Excellence, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Victoria City 87149, Mexico)

  • Ramón Ventura Roque-Hernández

    (Faculty of Commerce, Administration and Social Sciences, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Nuevo Laredo 88275, Mexico)

  • Ricardo de la Garza Cano

    (Center of Excellence, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Victoria City 87149, Mexico)

  • Eduardo Arvizu-Sánchez

    (Faculty of Architecture, Design and Urbanism, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Tampico 89337, Mexico)

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are considered as a globally accepted strategy for biodiversity conservation that demonstrates the difficulties in meeting the proposed objectives; therefore, different conservation schemes are promoted to integrate the design of interfaces that favor the exchange of knowledge among different sectors, systems and stakeholders. The objective of this study was to characterize challenges regarding the protection of natural protected areas and other biodiversity conservation schemes in Tamaulipas, Mexico. This paper analyzed 39 areas with some form of protection status in addition to the 70 national and international designations that are part of them. A document review and 13 semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts from the public, private, academic, and civil society sectors. The data were analyzed from a qualitative perspective using ATLAS.ti 9 software. The results show the overlapping of protection schemes in priority areas; the lack of policies and mechanisms that integrate the different schemes to facilitate the exchange between stakeholders; and regulatory, structural, governance, management, participation, and operational gaps, as well as the absence of comprehensive and long-term work. The importance of and challenges in articulating the different schemes and visions to achieve effective biodiversity conservation are evident.

Suggested Citation

  • Frida Carmina Caballero-Rico & Ramón Ventura Roque-Hernández & Ricardo de la Garza Cano & Eduardo Arvizu-Sánchez, 2022. "Challenges for the Integrated Management of Priority Areas for Conservation in Tamaulipas, México," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:494-:d:716934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/494/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/494/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miao He & An Cliquet, 2020. "Challenges for Protected Areas Management in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Yong Su & Jacob Cherian & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Alina Badulescu & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & Sarminah Samad, 2021. "Does Tourism Affect Economic Growth of China? A Panel Granger Causality Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Zhifeng Zhang & Yuping Tang & Hongyi Pan & Caiyi Yao & Tianyi Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Tatag Muttaqin & Fitri Raflesia & Erni Mukti Rahayu, 2022. "Measuring the role of stakeholders in management of Yang Highlands Wildlife Reserve Area, Situbondo Districts East Java Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 33(1), pages 468-478, July.
    5. Liang Chang & Teiji Watanabe, 2021. "Dilemma Faced by Management Staff in China’s Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Setyo Widagdo & Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti & Anak Agung Ayu Nanda Saraswati, 2021. "Repatriation as a Human Rights Approach to State Options in Dealing with Returning ISIS Foreign Terrorist Fighters," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    7. Andrew Rule & Sarah-Eve Dill & Gordy Sun & Aidan Chen & Senan Khawaja & Ingrid Li & Vincent Zhang & Scott Rozelle, 2022. "Challenges and Opportunities in Aligning Conservation with Development in China’s National Parks: A Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    8. repec:thr:techub:10033:y:2022:i:1:p:468-478 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Haleemunnissa, S. & Didel, Siyaram & Swami, Mukesh Kumar & Singh, Kuldeep & Vyas, Varuna, 2021. "Children and COVID19: Understanding impact on the growth trajectory of an evolving generation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Wenyuan Jiang & Shuanglin Jiang, 2023. "Evolution of Regulations Controlling Human Pressure in Protected Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Liu, Xia, 2023. "Tourism development, environmental regulations, and natural resource management: Evidence from G20 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    12. Ahmed Nuru Zeleke & Tuğba Deniz, 2023. "The Impact of Visitor Profile on Effective Management of Protected Areas: A Case of Atatürk Arboretum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Alexey Gunya & Alexey Lysenko & Izolda Lysenko & Ludmila Mitrofanenko, 2021. "Transformation of Nature Protection Institutions in the North Caucasus: From a State Monopoly of Governance to Multi-Actor Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:494-:d:716934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.