IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12145-d671534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformation of Nature Protection Institutions in the North Caucasus: From a State Monopoly of Governance to Multi-Actor Management

Author

Listed:
  • Alexey Gunya

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Staromonetniy Ln., 119017 Moscow, Russia)

  • Alexey Lysenko

    (Institute of Earth Sciences, North Caucasus Federal University, 1, Pushkin Street, 355017 Stavropol, Russia)

  • Izolda Lysenko

    (Faculty of Plants Protection, Stavropol State Agrarian University, 12 Zootechnicheskiy Ln., 355017 Stavropol, Russia)

  • Ludmila Mitrofanenko

    (Humanitarian Institute, North Caucasus Federal University, 1, Pushkin Street, 355017 Stavropol, Russia)

Abstract

The paper analyzes the state and dynamics of key actors and institutions that regulate the use of resources within the protected areas of the North Caucasus, using the examples of the Teberda Biosphere Reserve and the Elbrus National Park. The network of protected areas created in the North Caucasus during the Soviet period relied on government support, and the participation of the local population in nature conservation was very limited. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the demonopolization of state land laws, new actors emerged, such as the local population and business. This has led to an exacerbation of the conflict between the tasks of nature conservation and the interests of business and local communities. The introduction of market mechanisms and the commercialization of the tourism sector threaten the state of protected natural areas (PAs) and require effective ways of land matters regulation. The paper analyzes the question of whether the PA system created in the Soviet era should continue to be exclusively the privilege of the state using a centralized approach to management? The contradictions in legislation and conflicts of nature management have cast doubt on the effectiveness of the system of environmental institutions inherited from the Soviet period. One of the solutions could be the actualization of environmental legislation, bringing it in line with civil and land regulations, as well as the wide involvement of the local communities and the public in the evaluation of economic and legal projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey Gunya & Alexey Lysenko & Izolda Lysenko & Ludmila Mitrofanenko, 2021. "Transformation of Nature Protection Institutions in the North Caucasus: From a State Monopoly of Governance to Multi-Actor Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12145-:d:671534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qian Dong & Bo Zhang & Xiaomei Cai & Alastair M. Morrison, 2021. "Do Local Residents Support the Development of a National Park? A Study from Nanling National Park Based on Social Impact Assessment (SIA)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Jesse Sey Ayivor & Johnie Kodjo Nyametso & Sandra Ayivor, 2020. "Protected Area Governance and Its Influence on Local Perceptions, Attitudes and Collaboration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & João C. Azevedo & Pascual Fernández, 2021. "Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Rural Development and Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-3, September.
    4. Siyuan He & Lingfan Yang & Qingwen Min, 2020. "Community Participation in Nature Conservation: The Chinese Experience and Its Implication to National Park Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Maria Nijnik & Tatiana Kluvánková & Mariana Melnykovych & Albert Nijnik & Serhiy Kopiy & Stanislava Brnkaľáková & Simo Sarkki & Leonid Kopiy & Igor Fizyk & Carla Barlagne & David Miller, 2021. "An Institutional Analysis and Reconfiguration Framework for Sustainability Research on Post-Transition Forestry—A Focus on Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Ronald Mitchell, 2003. "Young, O. R., The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 191-194, June.
    7. Isabel Marques & João Leitão & Alba Carvalho & Dina Pereira, 2021. "Public Administration and Values Oriented to Sustainability: A Systematic Approach to the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Johann Baumgärtner & Getachew Tikubet & Gianni Gilioli, 2010. "Towards Adaptive Governance of Common-Pool Mountainous Agropastoral Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Aida Mammadova & Christopher D. Smith & Tatiana Yashina, 2021. "Comparative Analysis between the Role of Local Communities in Regional Development inside Japanese and Russian UNESCO’s Biosphere Reserves: Case Studies of Mount Hakusan and Katunskiy Biosphere Reserv," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Miao He & An Cliquet, 2020. "Challenges for Protected Areas Management in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frida Carmina Caballero-Rico & Ramón Ventura Roque-Hernández & Ricardo de la Garza Cano & Eduardo Arvizu-Sánchez, 2022. "Challenges for the Integrated Management of Priority Areas for Conservation in Tamaulipas, México," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Minerva Martínez Avila & Juan José García-Machado & Eréndira Fierro Moreno, 2021. "A Multiple Full Mediating Effect in a PLS Hierarchical Component Model: Application to the Collaborative Public Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Haleemunnissa, S. & Didel, Siyaram & Swami, Mukesh Kumar & Singh, Kuldeep & Vyas, Varuna, 2021. "Children and COVID19: Understanding impact on the growth trajectory of an evolving generation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Amare Tesfaw & Feyera Senbeta & Dawit Alemu & Ermias Teferi, 2022. "Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture Eucalyptus Plantations: A Choice Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Athanasios Ragkos & Alexandros Theodoridis & Georgios Arsenos, 2019. "Alternative Approaches of Summer Milk Sales from Transhumant Sheep and Goat Farms: A Case Study from Northern Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Qiujin Chen & Yuqi Zhang & Yin Zhang & Mingliang Kong, 2022. "Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas: Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Yong Su & Jacob Cherian & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Alina Badulescu & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & Sarminah Samad, 2021. "Does Tourism Affect Economic Growth of China? A Panel Granger Causality Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Klimanova, O.A. & Bukvareva, E.N. & Yu, Kolbowsky E. & Illarionova, O.A., 2023. "Assessing ecosystem services in Russia: Case studies from four municipal districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Yaquan Dou & Changhao Wu & Youjun He, 2023. "Public Concern and Awareness of National Parks in China: Evidence from Social Media Big Data and Questionnaire Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Michal Poljak & Radoslav Ponechal, 2023. "Microclimatic Monitoring—The Beginning of Saving Historical Sacral Buildings in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Wenyuan Jiang & Shuanglin Jiang, 2023. "Evolution of Regulations Controlling Human Pressure in Protected Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Edgardo Sica & Roberta Sisto & Naomi di Santo, 2022. "Are Potential Tourists Willing to Pay More for Improved Accessibility? Preliminary Evidence from the Gargano National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Zhifeng Zhang & Yuping Tang & Hongyi Pan & Caiyi Yao & Tianyi Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Liu, Xia, 2023. "Tourism development, environmental regulations, and natural resource management: Evidence from G20 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    17. Tatag Muttaqin & Fitri Raflesia & Erni Mukti Rahayu, 2022. "Measuring the role of stakeholders in management of Yang Highlands Wildlife Reserve Area, Situbondo Districts East Java Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 33(1), pages 468-478, July.
    18. Dona Octavia & Sri Suharti & Murniati & I Wayan Susi Dharmawan & Hunggul Yudono Setio Hadi Nugroho & Bambang Supriyanto & Dede Rohadi & Gerson Ndawa Njurumana & Irma Yeny & Aditya Hani & Nina Mindawat, 2022. "Mainstreaming Smart Agroforestry for Social Forestry Implementation to Support Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    19. Stephanie C. López & Andrés F. Cibils & Ursula R. Smedly & Steven J. Guldan & Alexander G. Fernald & Carlos G. Ochoa & Kenneth G. Boykin & Lilian Cibils, 2018. "Linkages Between acequia Farming and Rangeland Grazing in Traditional Agropastoral Communities of the Southwestern USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Matthew R. Sloggy & Francisco J. Escobedo & José J. Sánchez, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Information in Peri-Urban Ecosystem Service Valuation and Policy Investment Preferences," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12145-:d:671534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.