IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11534-d914775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Organisations’ Adoption Behaviour toward Blockchain-Based Distributed Identity Management: The Sustainability of Self-Sovereign Identity in Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Mulombo Mulaji

    (Department of Information Systems, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa)

  • Sumarie Roodt

    (Department of Information Systems, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa)

Abstract

Blockchain-based Distributed Identity Management (BDIDM) can enhance sustainable identification and authentication of users on organisations’ digital systems. But there is not a clear consensus on how organisations perceive the value proposition of such technology, nor what might affect their adoption behaviour toward it. This research explains how technological, organisational and environmental (TOE) factors affect organisations’ adoption behaviour toward BDIDM. This study aims to determine the most critical factors affecting the behaviour while assessing the effectiveness and appropriateness of the model involved, i.e., TOE-BDIDM. Online questionnaires are used to survey 111 information and cybersecurity practitioners within South African organisations. The analysis combines binary logistic regression modelling, Structural Equation Modelling of the measurement model, and chi-squared tests. The results suggest TOE factors positively or negatively affect adoption behaviour. The behaviour is significantly affected by technology characteristics, i.e., BDIDM’s disruptive nature, and is associated with Blockchain type. Indeed, the majority of participants intended to recommend BDIDM to their organisations yet paradoxically preferred private-permissioned blockchain the most, revealing resistance to decentralised and privacy-preserving BDIDM models like Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). The latter might be utopian or unsustainable for organisations. TOE-BDIDM was found relatively appropriate and effective but arguably ‘incomplete’ for explaining the adoption of disruptive technologies like SSI in organisations. TOE should extend to TOEU by including the User factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Mulombo Mulaji & Sumarie Roodt, 2022. "Factors Affecting Organisations’ Adoption Behaviour toward Blockchain-Based Distributed Identity Management: The Sustainability of Self-Sovereign Identity in Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11534-:d:914775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kshetri, Nir, 2017. "Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1027-1038.
    2. Marian STOICA & Bogdan GHILIC-MICU & Marinela MIRCEA, 2019. "Restarting the Information Society Based on Blockchain Technology," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(3), pages 39-48.
    3. Hart O. Awa & Ojiabo Ukoha & Bartholomew C. Emecheta, 2016. "Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1196571-119, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ammar AL-Ashmori & Gunasekar Thangarasu & P. D. D. Dominic & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "A Readiness Model and Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Malaysia’s Software Sector: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hiran, Kamal Kant & Dadhich, Manish, 2024. "Predicting the core determinants of cloud-edge computing adoption (CECA) for sustainable development in the higher education institutions of Africa: A high order SEM-ANN analytical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    3. Xiaobao Zhu & Jing Shi & Fengjie Xie & Rouqi Song, 2020. "Pricing strategy and system performance in a cloud-based manufacturing system built on blockchain technology," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1985-2002, December.
    4. Kirimhan, Destan, 2023. "Importance of anti-money laundering regulations among prosumers for a cybersecure decentralized finance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Ma, Chao-Qun & Lei, Yu-Tian & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Chen, Xun-Qi & Wang, Yi-Ran & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Systematic analysis of the blockchain in the energy sector: Trends, issues, and future directions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    6. Narendra Gariya & Anjas Asrani & Adhirath Mandal & Amir Shaikh & Dowan Cha, 2025. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Integrating Blockchain Technology into the Energy Supply Chain for the Enhancement of Transparency and Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Aristotelis Mavidis & Dimitris Folinas, 2022. "From Public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; A Critical Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Walter Kiptum Rono & Dr.Kennedy Ogada & Dr.Thomas Mose, 2022. "Modelling The Effect Of Selected Factors On Adoption Of Over-The-Top Services In Kenya," International Journal of Technology and Systems, IPRJB, vol. 7(1), pages 38-59.
    9. Priti Jagwani & V. B. Singh & Noopur Agrawal & Aditya P. Tripathi, 2023. "Blockchain technology and software engineering practices: a systematic review of literature using topic modelling approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Konstantinos Siassiakos & Stamatia Ilioudi & Tsaktsira Effrosyni & Vasiliki Mitsiou & Dimitris Nanouris, 2020. "Utilization of Blockchain Technology in Greek Public Administration," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12.
    11. Nianqi Deng & Yangyan Shi & Junbin Wang & Jighyasu Gaur, 2025. "Testing the adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management among MSMEs in China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 350(2), pages 629-648, July.
    12. James R. Barth & Hemantha S. B. Herath & Tejaswini C. Herath & Pei Xu, 2020. "Cryptocurrency valuation and ethics: a text analytic approach," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 367-388, July.
    13. Dutta, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Somani, Surabhi & Butala, Richa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    14. Irem Nur Ecemis & Fatih Ekinci & Koray Acici & Mehmet Serdar Guzel & Ihsan Tolga Medeni & Tunc Asuroglu, 2024. "Exploring Blockchain for Nuclear Material Tracking: A Scoping Review and Innovative Model Proposal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, June.
    15. Maria Nikopoulou & Panos Kourouthanassis & Giota Chasapi & Adamantia Pateli & Naoum Mylonas, 2023. "Determinants of Digital Transformation in the Hospitality Industry: Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Teng, Sin Yong & Touš, Michal & Leong, Wei Dong & How, Bing Shen & Lam, Hon Loong & Máša, Vítězslav, 2021. "Recent advances on industrial data-driven energy savings: Digital twins and infrastructures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Julio C. Mendoza-Tello & Higinio Mora & Francisco A. Pujol-López & Miltiadis D. Lytras, 2019. "Disruptive innovation of cryptocurrencies in consumer acceptance and trust," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-222, December.
    18. Qiang Wang & Min Su & Min Zhang & Rongrong Li, 2021. "Integrating Digital Technologies and Public Health to Fight Covid-19 Pandemic: Key Technologies, Applications, Challenges and Outlook of Digital Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-50, June.
    19. Ana-Maria Florescu & Claudio Vitari & Serge Amabile, 2025. "Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance," Post-Print hal-05251774, HAL.
    20. Lis Piotr & Mendel Jacob, 2019. "Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure: An economic perspective," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 24-47, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11534-:d:914775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.