IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11319-d910856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experts’ Perceptions of the Management and Minimisation of Waste in the Australian Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Israt Jahan

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Guomin Zhang

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Muhammed Bhuiyan

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Satheeskumar Navaratnam

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Long Shi

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

Abstract

Effective waste management has become a crucial factor in Australia because, from 1996 to 2015, the population increased by 28%, while Australia’s annual waste increased by 170%. In the period 2018–2019, Australia generated 27 Mt of construction demolition waste (44% of all waste). Although 76% of this waste is recycled, there has been a 61% increase in the rate of waste since 2006–2007. Therefore, minimising waste and prioritising waste management are necessary to build a circular economy. This study aims to identify the current waste minimisation perceptions in the Australian construction industry. A semi-structured interview was conducted with 50 industry experts focusing on four sectors (design/planning, building information modelling (BIM), material logistics, and prefabrication). The data were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively (Severity index). The result disclosed that the designers are the first contributor to waste minimisation, followed by the material suppliers/manufacturers. It is revealed that subjective attitude and the personal reluctance to exercise waste mitigation strategies are crucial. The outcome also indicated that BIM has the potential to minimise waste significantly. Overall, 15 key points were highlighted to consider for waste minimisation, and a conceptual framework was proposed. Therefore, identifying waste management’s current practices and the responsibility of industry personnel will help minimise waste and bring sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Israt Jahan & Guomin Zhang & Muhammed Bhuiyan & Satheeskumar Navaratnam & Long Shi, 2022. "Experts’ Perceptions of the Management and Minimisation of Waste in the Australian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11319-:d:910856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabia Charef & Jean-Claude Morel & Kambiz Rakhshan, 2021. "Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Anja Eisenreich & Johann Füller & Martin Stuchtey, 2021. "Open Circular Innovation: How Companies Can Develop Circular Innovations in Collaboration with Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Salman Shooshtarian & Tayyab Maqsood & Malik Khalfan & Rebecca J. Yang & Peter Wong, 2020. "Landfill Levy Imposition on Construction and Demolition Waste: Australian Stakeholders’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Dongchen Han & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Xudong Zhao & Saffa Riffat, 2007. "Prefabrication in house constructions," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 44-51, January.
    6. Tarja M�ki & Hannele Kerosuo, 2015. "Site managers' daily work and the uses of building information modelling in construction site management," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 163-175, March.
    7. Pamela C. Nolz, 2021. "Optimizing construction schedules and material deliveries in city logistics: a case study from the building industry," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 846-878, September.
    8. Antonis A. Zorpas & Maria K. Doula & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2021. "Waste Strategies Development in the Framework of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-5, December.
    9. Baldwin, Andrew & Poon, Chi-Sun & Shen, Li-Yin & Austin, Simon & Wong, Irene, 2009. "Designing out waste in high-rise residential buildings: Analysis of precasting methods and traditional construction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 2067-2073.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prin Boonkanit & Kridchai Suthiluck, 2023. "Developing a Decision-Making Support System for a Smart Construction and Demolition Waste Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Emma Heffernan & Leela Kempton, 2025. "Beyond Construction Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Strategies for the Avoidance and Minimisation of Construction and Demolition Waste in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Fangxin Li & Julian Pratama Putra Thedja & Sung-Han Sim & Joon-Oh Seo & Min-Koo Kim, 2023. "Range Image-Aided Edge Line Estimation for Dimensional Inspection of Precast Bridge Slab Using Point Cloud Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Muhammad Usman Shahid & Majid Ali, 2025. "Enablers and Policy Framework for Construction Waste Minimization Under Circular Economy: Stakeholder Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Savu & Adrian-Horatiu Pescaru & Ivett-Greta Zsak & Anca-Maria Durgheu & Alexandra-Paula Frent & Norbert-Szabolcs Suba & Aurelian Stelian Buda & Sorin Nistor, 2024. "Analysis on Using 3D Scanning and BIM to Reduce the Physical and Non-Physical Construction Waste for Sustainable Fireproofing of Steel Trusses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Yusuf Berkay Metinal & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp, 2025. "Uncovering Barriers to Circular Construction: A Global Scientometric Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-50, February.
    3. Sonja Kolarić & Mladen Vukomanović & Antonio Ramljak, 2022. "Analyzing the Level of Detail of Construction Schedule for Enabling Site Logistics Planning (SLP) in the Building Information Modeling (BIM) Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Marinos Stylianou & Iliana Papamichael & Irene Voukkali & Michail Tsangas & Michalis Omirou & Ioannis M. Ioannides & Antonis A. Zorpas, 2023. "LCA of Barley Production: A Case Study from Cyprus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Aníbal Maury-Ramírez & Danny Illera-Perozo & Jaime A. Mesa, 2022. "Circular Economy in the Construction Sector: A Case Study of Santiago de Cali (Colombia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Cyrine Mrad & Luís Frölén Ribeiro, 2022. "A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Charef, Rabia & Ganjian, Eshmaiel & Emmitt, Stephen, 2021. "Socio-economic and environmental barriers for a holistic asset lifecycle approach to achieve circular economy: A pattern-matching method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Hosang Hyun & Young-Min Lee & Hyung-Geun Kim & Jin-Sung Kim, 2021. "Framework for Long-Term Public Housing Supply Plan Focusing on Small-Scale Offsite Construction in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Rajkumar, G. & Saravanan, M. & Marimuthu, P., 2023. "Developing a numerical model to analyze the production process of PMEDM," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Nicole Anderson & Gayan Wedawatta & Ishara Rathnayake & Niluka Domingo & Zahirah Azizi, 2022. "Embodied Energy Consumption in the Residential Sector: A Case Study of Affordable Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Chun-Chih Chen & Chi-Hui Lai & Nai-Ren Guo & Shu-Ming Wu, 2024. "Exploring the Consumer Acceptance of Circular Housing from the Perspective of SOR Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Oluwole Abayomi Soyinka & Mesthrige Jayantha Wadu & Udara Willhelm Abeydera Lebunu Hewage & Timo Olugbenga Oladinrin, 2023. "Scientometric review of construction demolition waste management: a global sustainability perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10533-10565, October.
    13. Beata Piotrowska & Daniel Słyś, 2022. "Comprehensive Analysis of the State of Technology in the Field of Waste Heat Recovery from Grey Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Barbara Bigliardi & Serena Filippelli, 2022. "Sustainability and Open Innovation: Main Themes and Research Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Ali Al-Otaibi & Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan & Mahmoud M. Abdel daiem & Noha Said & John Obas Ebohon & Aasem Alabdullatief & Essa Al-Enazi & Greg Watts, 2022. "Identifying the Barriers to Sustainable Management of Construction and Demolition Waste in Developed and Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Elżbieta Szafranko & Magdalena Czyż, 2024. "Analysis of Tendencies, Change and Strength of Barriers Limiting the Development of BIM: A Novelty Assessment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Rabia Charef, 2024. "A Digital Framework for the Implementation of the Circular Economy in the Construction Sector: Expert Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Heba Marey & Gábor Kozma & György Szabó, 2022. "Effects of Using Green Concrete Materials on the CO 2 Emissions of the Residential Building Sector in Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Adetayo Onososen & Innocent Musonda & Motheo Meta Tjebane, 2022. "Drivers of BIM-Based Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Rubee Singh & Shahbaz Khan & Piera Centobelli, 2022. "Investigating the Interplay between Social Performance and Organisational Factors Supporting Circular Economy Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11319-:d:910856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.